Characterising melanoma diagnostic pathways for patients in routine practice using administrative health data in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086140
Meaghan E Mavor, Patti A Groome, Yuka Asai, Hugh Langley, Nicole J Look Hong, Frances C Wright, Timothy P Hanna
{"title":"Characterising melanoma diagnostic pathways for patients in routine practice using administrative health data in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.","authors":"Meaghan E Mavor, Patti A Groome, Yuka Asai, Hugh Langley, Nicole J Look Hong, Frances C Wright, Timothy P Hanna","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterise diagnostic pathways for patients with melanoma in routine practice and compare patient, disease and diagnostic interval (DI) characteristics across pathways.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive cross-sectional study using administrative health data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Population-based study in Ontario, Canada.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients with melanoma diagnosed from 2007 to 2019.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>We used latent class cluster analysis to create clusters of patients with similar diagnostic experiences to characterise diagnostic pathways in routine practice. Indicator variables characterised the patient's keratinocyte carcinoma and dermatologist history, presentation pattern, procedure types, number of visits and procedures, and the activity on the diagnosis date. χ<sup>2</sup> tests and Pearson residuals were used. We characterised clusters by the lengths of their DI, primary care subinterval and specialist care subinterval.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 33 371 patients diagnosed with melanoma from 2007 to 2019. We identified four diagnostic pathways: 'primary care only' (n=6107), 'referred to specialist with immediate action' (n=8987), 'multiple visits and procedures in specialist care' (n=11 893) and 'specialist care only' (n=6384). Patient, disease and DI characteristics varied across pathways. Pathway types varied regionally. A higher proportion in the 'primary care only' pathway lived in rural areas whereas a higher proportion in the 'referred to specialist for immediate action' and the 'specialist care only' pathways lived in major urban centres. Across pathways, the median DI varied from 1 to 67 days, the median primary care subinterval varied from 1 to 30 days and the median specialist care subinterval varied from 1 to 25 days. Patients in the 'primary care only' pathway experienced the shortest DIs, and patients in the 'multiple visits and procedures in specialist care' pathway experienced the longest DIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>We identified four melanoma diagnostic pathways. The shortest DI, the 'primary care only' pathway, highlights the important role of primary care and the need to reduce the wait for specialists. Diagnostic processes varied across geographical locations. Future research should address reasons for these differences, including whether they are associated with inefficient or inappropriate care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 1","pages":"e086140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterise diagnostic pathways for patients with melanoma in routine practice and compare patient, disease and diagnostic interval (DI) characteristics across pathways.

Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study using administrative health data.

Setting: Population-based study in Ontario, Canada.

Participants: Patients with melanoma diagnosed from 2007 to 2019.

Main outcome measures: We used latent class cluster analysis to create clusters of patients with similar diagnostic experiences to characterise diagnostic pathways in routine practice. Indicator variables characterised the patient's keratinocyte carcinoma and dermatologist history, presentation pattern, procedure types, number of visits and procedures, and the activity on the diagnosis date. χ2 tests and Pearson residuals were used. We characterised clusters by the lengths of their DI, primary care subinterval and specialist care subinterval.

Results: There were 33 371 patients diagnosed with melanoma from 2007 to 2019. We identified four diagnostic pathways: 'primary care only' (n=6107), 'referred to specialist with immediate action' (n=8987), 'multiple visits and procedures in specialist care' (n=11 893) and 'specialist care only' (n=6384). Patient, disease and DI characteristics varied across pathways. Pathway types varied regionally. A higher proportion in the 'primary care only' pathway lived in rural areas whereas a higher proportion in the 'referred to specialist for immediate action' and the 'specialist care only' pathways lived in major urban centres. Across pathways, the median DI varied from 1 to 67 days, the median primary care subinterval varied from 1 to 30 days and the median specialist care subinterval varied from 1 to 25 days. Patients in the 'primary care only' pathway experienced the shortest DIs, and patients in the 'multiple visits and procedures in specialist care' pathway experienced the longest DIs.

Conclusions and relevance: We identified four melanoma diagnostic pathways. The shortest DI, the 'primary care only' pathway, highlights the important role of primary care and the need to reduce the wait for specialists. Diagnostic processes varied across geographical locations. Future research should address reasons for these differences, including whether they are associated with inefficient or inappropriate care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表征黑色素瘤诊断途径的患者在常规实践中使用行政卫生数据在安大略省,加拿大:一项基于人群的研究。
目的:探讨黑色素瘤患者的诊断途径,并比较患者、疾病和诊断间隔(DI)特征。设计:使用行政健康数据的描述性横断面研究。背景:在加拿大安大略省进行的基于人群的研究。参与者:2007年至2019年诊断为黑色素瘤的患者。主要结果测量:我们使用潜在类聚类分析来创建具有相似诊断经历的患者聚类,以表征常规实践中的诊断途径。指标变量表征了患者的角化细胞癌和皮肤科医生的病史、表现模式、手术类型、就诊次数和手术程序,以及诊断当日的活动。采用χ2检验和Pearson残差。我们通过他们的DI,初级保健亚区间和专科护理亚区间的长度来表征集群。结果:2007 - 2019年确诊黑色素瘤患者33 371例。我们确定了四种诊断途径:“仅接受初级保健”(n=6107),“立即转诊给专科医生”(n=8987),“多次就诊并接受专科治疗”(n= 11893)和“仅接受专科治疗”(n=6384)。患者、疾病和DI的特征在不同的通路中有所不同。途径类型因地区而异。在“只提供初级保健”途径中,较高比例的人生活在农村地区,而在“请专家立即采取行动”和“只提供专家护理”途径中,较高比例的人生活在主要城市中心。在各个途径中,DI的中位数变化为1至67天,初级保健亚间隔的中位数变化为1至30天,专科护理亚间隔的中位数变化为1至25天。“仅接受初级保健”途径的患者经历了最短的DIs,而“多次就诊并接受专科护理”途径的患者经历了最长的DIs。结论和相关性:我们确定了四种黑色素瘤诊断途径。最短的残障保险,即“仅限初级保健”途径,强调了初级保健的重要作用和减少等待专科医生的必要性。诊断过程因地理位置而异。未来的研究应该解决这些差异的原因,包括它们是否与低效或不适当的护理有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and factors associated with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia among men aged 50 years and above in Coimbatore district, Tamil Nadu, India: a community-based cross-sectional study. Evaluating the impact of a medical telephone helpline and the use of a structured initial assessment on demand for acute and emergency care in Germany: an ecological study using secondary data. Listening effort among adult cochlear implant users: a protocol for a systematic review and measure-specific meta-analysis. Association between high-risk drinking and cardiovascular health based on Life's Essential 8: analysis using 2016-2021 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. Burden of atherosclerosis, cardiovascular risk factors and atrial fibrillation in individuals with covert brain infarcts in late midlife: the Akershus Cardiac Examination 1950 Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1