Exploring community stakeholder perspectives of partnership development in community-engaged undergraduate Global Health Education in the UK: a qualitative study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089766
Christine Pettitt, Dorota Chapko, Shyam Sundar Budhathoki, Keitumetse-Kabelo Murray, Helen Ward
{"title":"Exploring community stakeholder perspectives of partnership development in community-engaged undergraduate Global Health Education in the UK: a qualitative study.","authors":"Christine Pettitt, Dorota Chapko, Shyam Sundar Budhathoki, Keitumetse-Kabelo Murray, Helen Ward","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Traditionally, patients have had passive roles in medical education; however, there have been increasing efforts to partner with communities to create authentic representation of laypeople in medical education. Communities' perspectives of these initiatives have rarely been reported in the literature. This study explores the perspectives of members of community-based organisations (CBOs) who were partnered with a community engagement programme for intercalating medical students at Imperial College London.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted, employing reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>London, UK.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of five participants (one member from five CBOs who agreed to participate) were interviewed for this study. The selection criterion was direct involvement in the community engagement programme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three key themes were identified aligning with the core principles of co-production: building partnership, reciprocity in partnership and maintenance of relationship. Partnership development was influenced by the CBOs' perception of students which caused power differentials in the development of learning plans. Reciprocity refers to a multidirectional benefit pathway resulting from the community involvement programme, which had short-term and anticipated long-term effects. Relationships built were maintained via a service evaluation report, and participants discussed how attitudes of academic institutions towards collaboration influence communities' ability to participate in medical education.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The perspectives of CBOs reported in this study demonstrate that factors important to partnership development in community-engaged medical education are consistent with the key principles of co-production. Supported by literature, the findings emphasise that community involvement can be linked to social accountability and sustainable health practice. Provided that the possible risks/challenges are appropriately identified and mitigated to facilitate co-productive partnerships between stakeholders, the involvement of CBOs in medical education has the potential to provide benefits for communities, students and educational institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 1","pages":"e089766"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089766","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Traditionally, patients have had passive roles in medical education; however, there have been increasing efforts to partner with communities to create authentic representation of laypeople in medical education. Communities' perspectives of these initiatives have rarely been reported in the literature. This study explores the perspectives of members of community-based organisations (CBOs) who were partnered with a community engagement programme for intercalating medical students at Imperial College London.

Design: A qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted, employing reflexive thematic analysis.

Setting: London, UK.

Participants: A total of five participants (one member from five CBOs who agreed to participate) were interviewed for this study. The selection criterion was direct involvement in the community engagement programme.

Results: Three key themes were identified aligning with the core principles of co-production: building partnership, reciprocity in partnership and maintenance of relationship. Partnership development was influenced by the CBOs' perception of students which caused power differentials in the development of learning plans. Reciprocity refers to a multidirectional benefit pathway resulting from the community involvement programme, which had short-term and anticipated long-term effects. Relationships built were maintained via a service evaluation report, and participants discussed how attitudes of academic institutions towards collaboration influence communities' ability to participate in medical education.

Conclusions: The perspectives of CBOs reported in this study demonstrate that factors important to partnership development in community-engaged medical education are consistent with the key principles of co-production. Supported by literature, the findings emphasise that community involvement can be linked to social accountability and sustainable health practice. Provided that the possible risks/challenges are appropriately identified and mitigated to facilitate co-productive partnerships between stakeholders, the involvement of CBOs in medical education has the potential to provide benefits for communities, students and educational institutions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国社区参与本科全球健康教育中伙伴关系发展的社区利益相关者视角:一项定性研究。
目的:传统上,患者在医学教育中处于被动地位;然而,已经越来越多地努力与社区合作,在医学教育中建立外行人的真实代表。文献中很少报道社区对这些倡议的看法。本研究探讨了社区组织(cbo)成员的观点,他们与伦敦帝国理工学院插入医学院学生的社区参与计划合作。设计:采用半结构化访谈进行定性研究,采用反身性主题分析。背景:英国伦敦。参与者:本研究共采访了五名参与者(五名同意参与的cbo中的一名成员)。选择标准是直接参与社区参与计划。结果:确定了符合合作生产核心原则的三个关键主题:建立伙伴关系,伙伴关系中的互惠和关系的维护。cbo对学生的认知影响了伙伴关系的发展,从而导致了学习计划发展中的权力差异。互惠是指社区参与项目产生的多向效益途径,具有短期效应和预期的长期效应。建立的关系通过服务评估报告得以维持,与会者讨论了学术机构对合作的态度如何影响社区参与医学教育的能力。结论:本研究报告的社区医生的观点表明,社区参与医学教育中伙伴关系发展的重要因素与合作生产的关键原则是一致的。在文献的支持下,研究结果强调社区参与可以与社会责任和可持续的卫生实践联系起来。只要适当查明和减轻可能的风险/挑战,以促进利益攸关方之间的合作伙伴关系,社区组织参与医学教育就有可能为社区、学生和教育机构带来好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Haemoglobinopathies and health disparities: findings of a large-scale sample survey among indigenous populations in Odisha, India. Exploring the healthcare challenges and preparedness during disaster in south-western coastal areas in Bangladesh: a qualitative study. Correction: 'SinoMAKS-protocol of a randomised controlled trial to evaluate the Chinese version of the non-pharmacological, multimodal MAKS intervention for people with mild to moderate dementia in Chinese nursing homes'. Platform trial of smartphone-based cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for depressive symptoms among people with no or subthreshold depression: a protocol for the Best, Efficient and Affordable Training in Resilience in Constant Evolution (BEATRICE) platform trial. Understanding the impact of genomic secondary findings on clinical care and patient experience: a protocol for a prospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1