Biomass loss during decomposition – A new tool in improving PMI estimation?

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL Forensic science international Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112389
Natalie Gasz, Michelle Harvey
{"title":"Biomass loss during decomposition – A new tool in improving PMI estimation?","authors":"Natalie Gasz,&nbsp;Michelle Harvey","doi":"10.1016/j.forsciint.2025.112389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Determining the minimum post-mortem interval (<sub>min</sub>PMI) is a useful tool in the investigation of recovered human remains. Though typically based on temperature of remains in the early stages, and insect activity later in the decomposition process, attempts at concealment of remains can hinder these processes. Concealment can affect not only the immediate temperature remains are exposed to but may also result in an inability for insect colonisation to occur. This in turn will hinder the ability to estimate an accurate <sub>min</sub>PMI, and therefore timeline of events. As such, an understanding of the decomposition patterns where insect access is restricted through physical exclusion may assist in establishing a <sub>min</sub>PMI. This study utilised still born piglets (n = 48) over a 14-day period in November 2019 – 2022, in Geelong, Victoria, Australia. Piglets were either exposed, (controls), or had complete insect exclusion through a mechanical barrier which still allowed air flow and sampling to occur, with a total of 6 replicates of each condition per year. Piglets were observed daily, with temperature of remains, stage of decomposition, weight, and any insect activity present recorded. Physical barriers successfully excluded insects for the duration of the trial, however produced a greenhouse effect, producing a total of 4500 – 6000 accumulated degree hours (ADH) during the trial while controls only reached 3000–4500ADH in the same period. Bloat phase was severely prolonged in insect exclusion replicates, and subjects did not reach the dry phase by 2700ADH across all years, compared to control piglets which all had entered dry phase by this time. When comparing percentage biomass loss, consistency in overall biomass loss was noted in control piglets, as well as insect exclusion piglets in all trials. Control piglets showed a standard deviation of 5 % biomass loss at any given ADH. Exclusion of insects reduced overall biomass loss in comparison to ADH, however trends in the rate of loss could be established within the corresponding years. This study highlights that biomass loss can occur in the absence of insect exclusion through other decomposition processes, such as bacterial interactions, and may be a useful tool in the estimation of <sub>min</sub>PMI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12341,"journal":{"name":"Forensic science international","volume":"367 ","pages":"Article 112389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic science international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073825000271","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determining the minimum post-mortem interval (minPMI) is a useful tool in the investigation of recovered human remains. Though typically based on temperature of remains in the early stages, and insect activity later in the decomposition process, attempts at concealment of remains can hinder these processes. Concealment can affect not only the immediate temperature remains are exposed to but may also result in an inability for insect colonisation to occur. This in turn will hinder the ability to estimate an accurate minPMI, and therefore timeline of events. As such, an understanding of the decomposition patterns where insect access is restricted through physical exclusion may assist in establishing a minPMI. This study utilised still born piglets (n = 48) over a 14-day period in November 2019 – 2022, in Geelong, Victoria, Australia. Piglets were either exposed, (controls), or had complete insect exclusion through a mechanical barrier which still allowed air flow and sampling to occur, with a total of 6 replicates of each condition per year. Piglets were observed daily, with temperature of remains, stage of decomposition, weight, and any insect activity present recorded. Physical barriers successfully excluded insects for the duration of the trial, however produced a greenhouse effect, producing a total of 4500 – 6000 accumulated degree hours (ADH) during the trial while controls only reached 3000–4500ADH in the same period. Bloat phase was severely prolonged in insect exclusion replicates, and subjects did not reach the dry phase by 2700ADH across all years, compared to control piglets which all had entered dry phase by this time. When comparing percentage biomass loss, consistency in overall biomass loss was noted in control piglets, as well as insect exclusion piglets in all trials. Control piglets showed a standard deviation of 5 % biomass loss at any given ADH. Exclusion of insects reduced overall biomass loss in comparison to ADH, however trends in the rate of loss could be established within the corresponding years. This study highlights that biomass loss can occur in the absence of insect exclusion through other decomposition processes, such as bacterial interactions, and may be a useful tool in the estimation of minPMI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分解过程中的生物量损失——改进PMI估算的新工具?
最小死后间隔(minPMI)的确定是人类遗骸调查的一个有用工具。虽然通常基于早期阶段遗体的温度和后期分解过程中的昆虫活动,但试图隐藏遗体可能会阻碍这些过程。隐藏不仅会影响直接接触到的温度,还可能导致昆虫无法定植。这反过来又会妨碍估计准确的最小采购经理人指数,从而影响事件的时间表。因此,了解通过物理隔离限制昆虫进入的分解模式可能有助于建立最小pmi。本研究于2019年11月至2022年11月在澳大利亚维多利亚州吉朗市进行了为期14天的死产仔猪(n = 48)试验。仔猪要么暴露在空气中(对照),要么通过机械屏障完全隔离昆虫,但仍允许空气流动和采样,每种条件每年共6次重复。每天观察仔猪,记录尸体温度、分解阶段、体重和有无昆虫活动。物理屏障在试验期间成功地排除了昆虫,但产生了温室效应,在试验期间共产生4500 - 6000累积度小时(ADH),而对照组同期仅达到3000-4500ADH。在昆虫排除重复中,腹胀期严重延长,与对照仔猪相比,受试者在所有年份的2700ADH时均未达到干燥期,而对照仔猪此时均已进入干燥期。在比较生物量损失百分比时,在所有试验中,对照仔猪和除虫仔猪的总生物量损失都是一致的。在任何给定的ADH下,对照仔猪的生物量损失标准偏差为5 %。与ADH相比,排除昆虫减少了总体生物量损失,但损失率的趋势可以在相应的年份内确定。该研究强调,生物量损失可以在没有昆虫排除的情况下通过其他分解过程发生,例如细菌相互作用,并且可能是估计minPMI的有用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic science international
Forensic science international 医学-医学:法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Science International is the flagship journal in the prestigious Forensic Science International family, publishing the most innovative, cutting-edge, and influential contributions across the forensic sciences. Fields include: forensic pathology and histochemistry, chemistry, biochemistry and toxicology, biology, serology, odontology, psychiatry, anthropology, digital forensics, the physical sciences, firearms, and document examination, as well as investigations of value to public health in its broadest sense, and the important marginal area where science and medicine interact with the law. The journal publishes: Case Reports Commentaries Letters to the Editor Original Research Papers (Regular Papers) Rapid Communications Review Articles Technical Notes.
期刊最新文献
Identification of a nucleotide deletion at the flanking sequence of D12S391 that causes allelic imbalance and inter-kit discordance. Analysis of passive bloodstain morphology across surface textures and drop heights using deep learning. Benchmarking KinSNP®: A study on genetic relationship prediction for forensic applications. Dissolved organic matter: Unraveling the role of organic carbon from the hypogeal cadaver decomposition island. Striking energy achieved by knee strikes, elbow blows, head butts and fist punches
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1