Real-world study of phakic refractive lens for correction of high myopia.

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Eye and Vision Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1186/s40662-024-00423-z
An-Peng Pan, Xu Shao, Yi-Ke Li, Zi-Yue Li, Qiong Yan, Wei-Yang Sun, A-Yong Yu
{"title":"Real-world study of phakic refractive lens for correction of high myopia.","authors":"An-Peng Pan, Xu Shao, Yi-Ke Li, Zi-Yue Li, Qiong Yan, Wei-Yang Sun, A-Yong Yu","doi":"10.1186/s40662-024-00423-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the safety and efficacy of phakic refractive lens (PRL) implantation for correcting high myopia, as well as an ophthalmic viscosurgical device-free (OVD-free) method for PRL implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this real-world prospective study, consecutive patients implanted with PRL in one or both eyes were enrolled. Based on the surgical techniques used, the eyes were divided into the OVD-free method group and the conventional method group. The patients were examined 2 h after surgery and were scheduled for follow-up at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), intraocular pressure (IOP) and lens vault were assessed postoperatively. Corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) was measured at the 3- and 12-month postoperative visits.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven consecutive patients (108 eyes) were enrolled. At the 3-month postoperative visit, both mean UDVA and CDVA were significantly improved after PRL implantation (0.19 ± 0.21 and 0.01 ± 0.14 logMAR) with efficacy index and safety index of 0.92 and 1.30, respectively. None of the eyes had any loss of CDVA. The percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D and ± 1.00 D of target refraction was 58% and 83%, respectively. Mean MRSE changed from - 14.49 ± 4.22 D, preoperatively, to - 1.22 ± 1.26 D at 1 day (P < 0.001) and remained stable thereafter. Mean endothelial cell loss was 11.3%, 9.6%, respectively, at 3 and 12 months, with no significant difference between the two follow-ups (P = 0.395). Fifty-nine eyes received the OVD-free method, and 49 eyes received the conventional method. The OVD-free method demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of early acute IOP elevations (28.8% vs. 53.1%, P = 0.022) compared to the conventional method. The difference of initial endothelial cell loss (9.4 ± 14.2% vs. 13.6 ± 14.6%) between the two groups trended toward significance (P = 0.056). In both groups, no other major complications were observed up to 12-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PRL implantation was a safe, efficient, predictable and stable method for correcting high myopia. The potential of lower incidence of early acute IOP elevations makes the OVD-free method a promising alternative to the conventional method.</p><p><strong>Trail registration: </strong>Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100043600. Registered on 23 February 2021, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=122229.</p>","PeriodicalId":12194,"journal":{"name":"Eye and Vision","volume":"12 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-024-00423-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess the safety and efficacy of phakic refractive lens (PRL) implantation for correcting high myopia, as well as an ophthalmic viscosurgical device-free (OVD-free) method for PRL implantation.

Methods: In this real-world prospective study, consecutive patients implanted with PRL in one or both eyes were enrolled. Based on the surgical techniques used, the eyes were divided into the OVD-free method group and the conventional method group. The patients were examined 2 h after surgery and were scheduled for follow-up at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), intraocular pressure (IOP) and lens vault were assessed postoperatively. Corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) was measured at the 3- and 12-month postoperative visits.

Results: Fifty-seven consecutive patients (108 eyes) were enrolled. At the 3-month postoperative visit, both mean UDVA and CDVA were significantly improved after PRL implantation (0.19 ± 0.21 and 0.01 ± 0.14 logMAR) with efficacy index and safety index of 0.92 and 1.30, respectively. None of the eyes had any loss of CDVA. The percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D and ± 1.00 D of target refraction was 58% and 83%, respectively. Mean MRSE changed from - 14.49 ± 4.22 D, preoperatively, to - 1.22 ± 1.26 D at 1 day (P < 0.001) and remained stable thereafter. Mean endothelial cell loss was 11.3%, 9.6%, respectively, at 3 and 12 months, with no significant difference between the two follow-ups (P = 0.395). Fifty-nine eyes received the OVD-free method, and 49 eyes received the conventional method. The OVD-free method demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of early acute IOP elevations (28.8% vs. 53.1%, P = 0.022) compared to the conventional method. The difference of initial endothelial cell loss (9.4 ± 14.2% vs. 13.6 ± 14.6%) between the two groups trended toward significance (P = 0.056). In both groups, no other major complications were observed up to 12-month follow-up.

Conclusions: PRL implantation was a safe, efficient, predictable and stable method for correcting high myopia. The potential of lower incidence of early acute IOP elevations makes the OVD-free method a promising alternative to the conventional method.

Trail registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100043600. Registered on 23 February 2021, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=122229.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Eye and Vision
Eye and Vision OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
89
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Eye and Vision is an open access, peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. It welcomes research articles, reviews, methodologies, commentaries, case reports, perspectives and short reports encompassing all aspects of eye and vision. Topics of interest include but are not limited to: current developments of theoretical, experimental and clinical investigations in ophthalmology, optometry and vision science which focus on novel and high-impact findings on central issues pertaining to biology, pathophysiology and etiology of eye diseases as well as advances in diagnostic techniques, surgical treatment, instrument updates, the latest drug findings, results of clinical trials and research findings. It aims to provide ophthalmologists and visual science specialists with the latest developments in theoretical, experimental and clinical investigations in eye and vision.
期刊最新文献
Iridectomy combined with posterior approach anterior chamber gas injection technique: a novel technique for the treatment of extensive Descemet's membrane detachment. Myopia control efficacy of spectacle lenses with highly aspherical lenslets: results of a 5-year follow-up study. Preoperative edema severity affects outcomes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy: a cohort study. Influence of preoperative variables on the 3-month functional outcomes of the Vivity extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: a prospective case series. Real-world study of phakic refractive lens for correction of high myopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1