Early outcome of stenting for treating iliac vein compression syndrome combined with acute deep venous thrombosis

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2024.106789
M.-S. Sun , J.-H. Wen , Z.-Y. Jin, C.-M. Li
{"title":"Early outcome of stenting for treating iliac vein compression syndrome combined with acute deep venous thrombosis","authors":"M.-S. Sun ,&nbsp;J.-H. Wen ,&nbsp;Z.-Y. Jin,&nbsp;C.-M. Li","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.106789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The present study assessed the effectiveness and safety of stent placement for treating iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) with acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective study on 31 patients with IVCS companied with acute DVT who underwent percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy or catheter-directed thrombolysis and angioplasty combined with iliac vein stenting from January 2017 to January 2023. Follow-up was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgical procedure. At each visit, patients were evaluated by colour Doppler ultrasound or computed tomography venography to determine stent patency; additionally, visual analog scale (VAS), venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and five-level EuroQol-five dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire were used to assess pain, severity, and symptoms associated with venous pathology and quality of life, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The technical success rate of stent placement was 100 % in all patients. All patients completed follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The primary patency rates were 96.8 % (95 % CI: 90.2–103.4 %) at 3, 6, and 12 months. The secondary patency rate was 96.8 % (95 % CI: 90.2–103.4 %) at 3 months and 100 % at 6, and 12 months. Only one patient experienced in-stent restenosis and underwent reintervention postoperation. All patients showed a significant improvement (P&lt;0.05) in the scores of VAS, VCSS, and EQ-5D-5L.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Venous stent implantation was a safe and effective therapeutic approach for patients with IVCS combined with acute DVT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 106789"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926024006767","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The present study assessed the effectiveness and safety of stent placement for treating iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS) with acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

Materials and Methods

We conducted a retrospective study on 31 patients with IVCS companied with acute DVT who underwent percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy or catheter-directed thrombolysis and angioplasty combined with iliac vein stenting from January 2017 to January 2023. Follow-up was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgical procedure. At each visit, patients were evaluated by colour Doppler ultrasound or computed tomography venography to determine stent patency; additionally, visual analog scale (VAS), venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and five-level EuroQol-five dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire were used to assess pain, severity, and symptoms associated with venous pathology and quality of life, respectively.

Results

The technical success rate of stent placement was 100 % in all patients. All patients completed follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The primary patency rates were 96.8 % (95 % CI: 90.2–103.4 %) at 3, 6, and 12 months. The secondary patency rate was 96.8 % (95 % CI: 90.2–103.4 %) at 3 months and 100 % at 6, and 12 months. Only one patient experienced in-stent restenosis and underwent reintervention postoperation. All patients showed a significant improvement (P<0.05) in the scores of VAS, VCSS, and EQ-5D-5L.

Conclusion

Venous stent implantation was a safe and effective therapeutic approach for patients with IVCS combined with acute DVT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
期刊最新文献
Does training less-than-full-time predict performance at the FRCR exams?: a UKMED cohort study Interventional radiology is growing and is a pillar of modern cost-effective healthcare across the world Classifying, recognizing, and troubleshooting errors in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided breast biopsies Comparative study of 3D-T2WI vs. 3D-T2-FLAIR MRI in displaying human meningeal lymphatics vessels Dual-energy subtraction radiography (DESR): a systematic review and meta-analysis of pulmonary nodule detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1