Magnetic resonance imaging–based nomograms predict high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: a two-centre study

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2024.106768
S. Liu , C. Liu , H. Pan , S. Li , P. Teng , Z. Li , J. Sun , T. Ren , G. Liu , J. Zhou
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging–based nomograms predict high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma: a two-centre study","authors":"S. Liu ,&nbsp;C. Liu ,&nbsp;H. Pan ,&nbsp;S. Li ,&nbsp;P. Teng ,&nbsp;Z. Li ,&nbsp;J. Sun ,&nbsp;T. Ren ,&nbsp;G. Liu ,&nbsp;J. Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2024.106768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>The study aim to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features to predict high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) to improve outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>One hundred ninety-five patients with MM from two centres undergoing MRI were retrospectively recruited. Patients from Institution I (71 and 88 HRCAs and non-HRCAs, respectively) identified by fluorescence in situ hybridisation were randomly divided into training (n = 111) and validation (n = 48) cohorts. Patients from Institution II served as the external test cohort (n = 36). Radiomics or combined models based on T1WI, T2WI, and FS-T2WI images and clinical factors were constructed using logistic regression and 10-fold cross-validation in the training cohort. Nomogram performance was evaluated and compared using C-index, bootstrapping, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Akaike information criterion. C-indexes were used to select the most efficient radiomics predictive model. Optimal model performance was tested in an external cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>FT<sub>2</sub>+age, FT<sub>2+1</sub>+age, and FT<sub>2+2+1</sub>+age combined models were outstanding in differentiating the HRCAs of MM patients in single-, double-, and multi-sequence MRI images, respectively. The C-indexes of the training and validation cohorts corrected via the 1000 bootstrap method were 0.79 and 0.80, 0.83 and 0.84, and 0.88 and 0.84, respectively. In the external test cohort, the C-index of radiomics nomograms was 0.70, 0.76, and 0.77, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MRI radiomics can be used to predict HRCAs in MM patients, which will be helpful for clinical decision-making and prognosis evaluation before treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 106768"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000992602400655X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The study aim to use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomic features to predict high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) to improve outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).

Materials and Methods

One hundred ninety-five patients with MM from two centres undergoing MRI were retrospectively recruited. Patients from Institution I (71 and 88 HRCAs and non-HRCAs, respectively) identified by fluorescence in situ hybridisation were randomly divided into training (n = 111) and validation (n = 48) cohorts. Patients from Institution II served as the external test cohort (n = 36). Radiomics or combined models based on T1WI, T2WI, and FS-T2WI images and clinical factors were constructed using logistic regression and 10-fold cross-validation in the training cohort. Nomogram performance was evaluated and compared using C-index, bootstrapping, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Akaike information criterion. C-indexes were used to select the most efficient radiomics predictive model. Optimal model performance was tested in an external cohort.

Results

FT2+age, FT2+1+age, and FT2+2+1+age combined models were outstanding in differentiating the HRCAs of MM patients in single-, double-, and multi-sequence MRI images, respectively. The C-indexes of the training and validation cohorts corrected via the 1000 bootstrap method were 0.79 and 0.80, 0.83 and 0.84, and 0.88 and 0.84, respectively. In the external test cohort, the C-index of radiomics nomograms was 0.70, 0.76, and 0.77, respectively.

Conclusion

MRI radiomics can be used to predict HRCAs in MM patients, which will be helpful for clinical decision-making and prognosis evaluation before treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于磁共振成像的形态学图预测多发性骨髓瘤的高危细胞遗传学异常:一项双中心研究。
目的:本研究旨在利用磁共振成像(MRI)放射学特征预测高危细胞遗传学异常(HRCAs),以改善多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者的预后。材料和方法:回顾性地招募了来自两个中心的195例MM患者进行MRI。通过荧光原位杂交鉴定的hrca和非hrca患者分别为71例和88例,随机分为训练组(n = 111)和验证组(n = 48)。来自第二研究所的患者作为外部试验队列(n = 36)。基于T1WI, T2WI和FS-T2WI图像和临床因素的放射组学或组合模型在训练队列中使用逻辑回归和10倍交叉验证构建。采用C-index、bootapping、准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和赤池信息准则对Nomogram性能进行评价和比较。使用c指数选择最有效的放射组学预测模型。在外部队列中测试了模型的最佳性能。结果:FT2+age、FT2+1+age、FT2+2+1+age联合模型分别在单、双、多序列MRI影像上对MM患者hrca具有突出的鉴别价值。经过1000次bootstrap方法校正的训练队列和验证队列的c指数分别为0.79和0.80、0.83和0.84、0.88和0.84。在外部测试队列中,放射组学图的c指数分别为0.70、0.76和0.77。结论:MRI放射组学可预测MM患者hrca,有助于临床决策和治疗前预后评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
期刊最新文献
Contents Ultrasound-guided cryoablation for breast cancer ineligible for or refused surgery: a single-center experience The appropriateness of primary care physician referrals for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): retrospective cross-sectional study The Hull mechanical thrombectomy (MT) model: interventional radiologists performing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke in the United Kingdom. Training, governance and beyond, with a propensity score matching analysis of outcomes RCR meetings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1