Measurement of lumbar vertebral body attenuation at PET-CT is a reliable method of diagnosing osteoporosis

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Clinical radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2025.106810
M. Courtney , E. Hession, C. Johnston, N. Sheehy
{"title":"Measurement of lumbar vertebral body attenuation at PET-CT is a reliable method of diagnosing osteoporosis","authors":"M. Courtney ,&nbsp;E. Hession,&nbsp;C. Johnston,&nbsp;N. Sheehy","doi":"10.1016/j.crad.2025.106810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study investigates the potential of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) as a reliable tool for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, using attenuation values as a marker for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively identified 305 patients who underwent both PET-CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) within a six-month interval at a tertiary healthcare centre. Attenuation values were measured from the first lumbar vertebra (L1) on noncontrast CT images acquired during PET-CT scans. These values were then compared with corresponding DEXA T-scores to determine their diagnostic performance. Statistical analyses, including one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Pearson correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were employed to assess the correlation between PET-CT attenuation values and DEXA-defined osteoporosis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean Hounsfield units (HU) differed significantly between groups classified by DEXA as osteoporosis, osteopenia, or normal BMD (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). A strong correlation was found between HU and DEXA T-scores (Pearson coefficient = 0.65). Using logistic regression, we identified HU thresholds of 120 for 90% sensitivity and 98 for 90% specificity. The optimal balanced threshold was 109 HU, achieving both 80% sensitivity and specificity. The ROC curve for the model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88, indicating high diagnostic accuracy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>PET-CT can effectively screen for osteoporosis, offering a noninvasive, opportunistic diagnostic tool that requires no additional radiation exposure or resources. This study establishes 109 HU as the optimal threshold for diagnosing osteoporosis on PET-CT, providing a significant opportunity for early intervention and improved patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10695,"journal":{"name":"Clinical radiology","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 106810"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0009926025000157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study investigates the potential of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) as a reliable tool for the diagnosis of osteoporosis, using attenuation values as a marker for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively identified 305 patients who underwent both PET-CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) within a six-month interval at a tertiary healthcare centre. Attenuation values were measured from the first lumbar vertebra (L1) on noncontrast CT images acquired during PET-CT scans. These values were then compared with corresponding DEXA T-scores to determine their diagnostic performance. Statistical analyses, including one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Pearson correlation, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were employed to assess the correlation between PET-CT attenuation values and DEXA-defined osteoporosis.

Results

The mean Hounsfield units (HU) differed significantly between groups classified by DEXA as osteoporosis, osteopenia, or normal BMD (P < 0.001). A strong correlation was found between HU and DEXA T-scores (Pearson coefficient = 0.65). Using logistic regression, we identified HU thresholds of 120 for 90% sensitivity and 98 for 90% specificity. The optimal balanced threshold was 109 HU, achieving both 80% sensitivity and specificity. The ROC curve for the model showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88, indicating high diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusion

PET-CT can effectively screen for osteoporosis, offering a noninvasive, opportunistic diagnostic tool that requires no additional radiation exposure or resources. This study establishes 109 HU as the optimal threshold for diagnosing osteoporosis on PET-CT, providing a significant opportunity for early intervention and improved patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在PET-CT上测量腰椎椎体衰减是诊断骨质疏松症的可靠方法。
目的:本研究探讨正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)作为骨质疏松症诊断的可靠工具的潜力,利用衰减值作为骨矿物质密度(BMD)评估的标志。材料和方法:我们回顾性地确定了305名在三级医疗中心接受PET-CT和双能x线吸收仪(DEXA)检查的患者,时间间隔为6个月。在PET-CT扫描期间获得的非对比CT图像上测量第一腰椎(L1)的衰减值。然后将这些值与相应的DEXA t评分进行比较,以确定其诊断性能。采用统计学分析,包括单因素方差分析(ANOVA)、Pearson相关和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析来评估PET-CT衰减值与dexa定义的骨质疏松症之间的相关性。结果:平均Hounsfield单位(HU)在DEXA分类为骨质疏松症、骨质减少症或骨密度正常组之间差异显著(P < 0.001)。HU与DEXA t -评分之间有很强的相关性(Pearson系数= 0.65)。使用逻辑回归,我们确定HU阈值为120,灵敏度为90%,98为90%的特异性。最佳平衡阈值为109 HU,敏感性和特异性均达到80%。模型的ROC曲线显示曲线下面积(AUC)为0.88,诊断准确率较高。结论:PET-CT可以有效地筛查骨质疏松症,提供了一种无创、机会性的诊断工具,不需要额外的辐射暴露或资源。本研究确定109hu为PET-CT诊断骨质疏松的最佳阈值,为早期干预和改善患者护理提供了重要机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical radiology
Clinical radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
528
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Radiology is published by Elsevier on behalf of The Royal College of Radiologists. Clinical Radiology is an International Journal bringing you original research, editorials and review articles on all aspects of diagnostic imaging, including: • Computed tomography • Magnetic resonance imaging • Ultrasonography • Digital radiology • Interventional radiology • Radiography • Nuclear medicine Papers on radiological protection, quality assurance, audit in radiology and matters relating to radiological training and education are also included. In addition, each issue contains correspondence, book reviews and notices of forthcoming events.
期刊最新文献
Contents Ultrasound-guided cryoablation for breast cancer ineligible for or refused surgery: a single-center experience The appropriateness of primary care physician referrals for lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): retrospective cross-sectional study The Hull mechanical thrombectomy (MT) model: interventional radiologists performing mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke in the United Kingdom. Training, governance and beyond, with a propensity score matching analysis of outcomes RCR meetings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1