Influence of cognitive demand and auditory noise on postural dynamics.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s00221-025-06998-w
Sam Carey, Ramesh Balasubramaniam
{"title":"Influence of cognitive demand and auditory noise on postural dynamics.","authors":"Sam Carey, Ramesh Balasubramaniam","doi":"10.1007/s00221-025-06998-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The control of human balance involves an interaction between the human motor, cognitive, and sensory systems. The dynamics of this interaction are yet to be fully understood, however, work has shown the performance of cognitive tasks to have a hampering effect on motor performance, while additive sensory noise to have a beneficial effect. The current study aims to examine whether postural control will be impacted by a concurrent working memory task, and similarly, if additive noise can counteract the expected negative influence of the added cognitive demand. Postural sway of healthy young adults was collected during the performance of a modified N-back task with varying difficulty, in the presence and absence of auditory noise. Our results show a reduction in postural stability scaled to the difficulty of the cognitive task, but this effect is less prominent in the presence of additive noise. Additionally, by separating postural sway into different frequency bands, typically used to assess the exploratory vs feedback-driven stabilizing dynamics of sway, we found a differential effect between the cognitive task and additive noise, thus demonstrating that both frequency regimes of postural sway are sensitive to high cognitive load and increased sensory information.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":"243 2","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-025-06998-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The control of human balance involves an interaction between the human motor, cognitive, and sensory systems. The dynamics of this interaction are yet to be fully understood, however, work has shown the performance of cognitive tasks to have a hampering effect on motor performance, while additive sensory noise to have a beneficial effect. The current study aims to examine whether postural control will be impacted by a concurrent working memory task, and similarly, if additive noise can counteract the expected negative influence of the added cognitive demand. Postural sway of healthy young adults was collected during the performance of a modified N-back task with varying difficulty, in the presence and absence of auditory noise. Our results show a reduction in postural stability scaled to the difficulty of the cognitive task, but this effect is less prominent in the presence of additive noise. Additionally, by separating postural sway into different frequency bands, typically used to assess the exploratory vs feedback-driven stabilizing dynamics of sway, we found a differential effect between the cognitive task and additive noise, thus demonstrating that both frequency regimes of postural sway are sensitive to high cognitive load and increased sensory information.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认知需求和听觉噪声对体位动力学的影响。
人体平衡的控制涉及人体运动系统、认知系统和感觉系统之间的相互作用。这种相互作用的动力学尚未被完全理解,然而,研究表明,认知任务的表现对运动表现有阻碍作用,而附加的感觉噪音有有益的影响。当前的研究旨在检验姿势控制是否会受到并发工作记忆任务的影响,同样,是否附加噪声可以抵消预期的额外认知需求的负面影响。在存在和不存在听觉噪音的情况下,在不同难度的改进N-back任务中收集健康年轻人的姿势摇摆。我们的研究结果显示,姿势稳定性的降低与认知任务的难度成比例,但这种影响在附加噪声存在时不那么突出。此外,通过将姿势摇摆分成不同的频带(通常用于评估摇摆的探索性与反馈驱动的稳定动力学),我们发现认知任务和加性噪声之间存在差异效应,从而表明姿势摇摆的两种频率都对高认知负荷和增加的感觉信息敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
期刊最新文献
Binasal occlusion modulates cortical functional connectivity and hemodynamics in acquired paralytic esotropia: a fNIRS study. Comments on "The equilibrium point hypothesis revisited: why threshold control does not explain human movement" (Mangalam and Stergiou, Exp Brain Res., 2026). Intercepting moving targets: does the visuomotor latency depend on whether one taps on the target or slides through it? Visuomotor information drives interference between the hands more than dynamic motor information during bimanual reaching. Association of corpus callosum and corticospinal tract microstructure with bimanual coordination in children with unilateral cerebral palsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1