"All doctors should be trained in that": The co-production and mixed-methods evaluation of an educational toolkit to enable safe, high-quality genetic healthcare for people with intellectual disability.
Iva Strnadová, Manjekah Dunn, Chloe Molnar, Julie Loblinzk, Jackie Leach Scully, Joanne Danker, Michelle Tso, Tiffany Qing Lim, Yasmin Cathcart-King, Karen-Maia Jackaman, Sarah Hayes, Sierra Angelina Willow, Jackie Boyle, Jennifer Hansen, Skie Sarfaraz, Caroline Basckin, Celia Halliburton, Thulasee Sri Ganeshan, Edwina K Middleton, Bronwyn Terrill, Elizabeth Emma Palmer
{"title":"\"All doctors should be trained in that\": The co-production and mixed-methods evaluation of an educational toolkit to enable safe, high-quality genetic healthcare for people with intellectual disability.","authors":"Iva Strnadová, Manjekah Dunn, Chloe Molnar, Julie Loblinzk, Jackie Leach Scully, Joanne Danker, Michelle Tso, Tiffany Qing Lim, Yasmin Cathcart-King, Karen-Maia Jackaman, Sarah Hayes, Sierra Angelina Willow, Jackie Boyle, Jennifer Hansen, Skie Sarfaraz, Caroline Basckin, Celia Halliburton, Thulasee Sri Ganeshan, Edwina K Middleton, Bronwyn Terrill, Elizabeth Emma Palmer","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2025.101371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>People with intellectual disability inequitably access high-quality genetic healthcare. Yet, they are keen to understand more about genetic healthcare and recommend clinicians need education on delivering more inclusive care and that multi-modal genetic health literacy resources should be co-produced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our inclusive research team applied best practice co-production principles to deliver a suite of resources, the GeneEQUAL Toolkit. Mixed-methods evaluation including surveys and a focus group/interviews assessed (i) clinicians' perceived capabilities, motivation, and opportunities for providing inclusive healthcare for people with intellectual disability before and after exploring the Toolkit; (ii) the perceptions and opinions of people with intellectual disability about the Toolkit; (iii) the reach of the Toolkit components; and (iv) the reflections of people with intellectual disability and clinicians on the co-production process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Toolkit met the expectations and preferences of people with intellectual disability and clinicians and had global reach. Co-production was feasible and judged critical for the high value of the Toolkit, in motivating clinicians to change their clinical practice and empowering people with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Co-production can be successfully applied to improve the engagement of people with intellectual disability and potentially reduce health inequity and improve safety and quality of genetic healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101371"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101371","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: People with intellectual disability inequitably access high-quality genetic healthcare. Yet, they are keen to understand more about genetic healthcare and recommend clinicians need education on delivering more inclusive care and that multi-modal genetic health literacy resources should be co-produced.
Methods: Our inclusive research team applied best practice co-production principles to deliver a suite of resources, the GeneEQUAL Toolkit. Mixed-methods evaluation including surveys and a focus group/interviews assessed (i) clinicians' perceived capabilities, motivation, and opportunities for providing inclusive healthcare for people with intellectual disability before and after exploring the Toolkit; (ii) the perceptions and opinions of people with intellectual disability about the Toolkit; (iii) the reach of the Toolkit components; and (iv) the reflections of people with intellectual disability and clinicians on the co-production process.
Results: The Toolkit met the expectations and preferences of people with intellectual disability and clinicians and had global reach. Co-production was feasible and judged critical for the high value of the Toolkit, in motivating clinicians to change their clinical practice and empowering people with intellectual disability.
Conclusion: Co-production can be successfully applied to improve the engagement of people with intellectual disability and potentially reduce health inequity and improve safety and quality of genetic healthcare.
期刊介绍:
Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health.
GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.