"All doctors should be trained in that": The co-production and mixed-methods evaluation of an educational toolkit to enable safe, high-quality genetic healthcare for people with intellectual disability.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genetics in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2025.101371
Iva Strnadová, Manjekah Dunn, Chloe Molnar, Julie Loblinzk, Jackie Leach Scully, Joanne Danker, Michelle Tso, Tiffany Qing Lim, Yasmin Cathcart-King, Karen-Maia Jackaman, Sarah Hayes, Sierra Angelina Willow, Jackie Boyle, Jennifer Hansen, Skie Sarfaraz, Caroline Basckin, Celia Halliburton, Thulasee Sri Ganeshan, Edwina K Middleton, Bronwyn Terrill, Elizabeth Emma Palmer
{"title":"\"All doctors should be trained in that\": The co-production and mixed-methods evaluation of an educational toolkit to enable safe, high-quality genetic healthcare for people with intellectual disability.","authors":"Iva Strnadová, Manjekah Dunn, Chloe Molnar, Julie Loblinzk, Jackie Leach Scully, Joanne Danker, Michelle Tso, Tiffany Qing Lim, Yasmin Cathcart-King, Karen-Maia Jackaman, Sarah Hayes, Sierra Angelina Willow, Jackie Boyle, Jennifer Hansen, Skie Sarfaraz, Caroline Basckin, Celia Halliburton, Thulasee Sri Ganeshan, Edwina K Middleton, Bronwyn Terrill, Elizabeth Emma Palmer","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2025.101371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>People with intellectual disability inequitably access high-quality genetic healthcare. Yet, they are keen to understand more about genetic healthcare and recommend clinicians need education on delivering more inclusive care and that multi-modal genetic health literacy resources should be co-produced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our inclusive research team applied best practice co-production principles to deliver a suite of resources, the GeneEQUAL Toolkit. Mixed-methods evaluation including surveys and a focus group/interviews assessed (i) clinicians' perceived capabilities, motivation, and opportunities for providing inclusive healthcare for people with intellectual disability before and after exploring the Toolkit; (ii) the perceptions and opinions of people with intellectual disability about the Toolkit; (iii) the reach of the Toolkit components; and (iv) the reflections of people with intellectual disability and clinicians on the co-production process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Toolkit met the expectations and preferences of people with intellectual disability and clinicians and had global reach. Co-production was feasible and judged critical for the high value of the Toolkit, in motivating clinicians to change their clinical practice and empowering people with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Co-production can be successfully applied to improve the engagement of people with intellectual disability and potentially reduce health inequity and improve safety and quality of genetic healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101371"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2025.101371","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: People with intellectual disability inequitably access high-quality genetic healthcare. Yet, they are keen to understand more about genetic healthcare and recommend clinicians need education on delivering more inclusive care and that multi-modal genetic health literacy resources should be co-produced.

Methods: Our inclusive research team applied best practice co-production principles to deliver a suite of resources, the GeneEQUAL Toolkit. Mixed-methods evaluation including surveys and a focus group/interviews assessed (i) clinicians' perceived capabilities, motivation, and opportunities for providing inclusive healthcare for people with intellectual disability before and after exploring the Toolkit; (ii) the perceptions and opinions of people with intellectual disability about the Toolkit; (iii) the reach of the Toolkit components; and (iv) the reflections of people with intellectual disability and clinicians on the co-production process.

Results: The Toolkit met the expectations and preferences of people with intellectual disability and clinicians and had global reach. Co-production was feasible and judged critical for the high value of the Toolkit, in motivating clinicians to change their clinical practice and empowering people with intellectual disability.

Conclusion: Co-production can be successfully applied to improve the engagement of people with intellectual disability and potentially reduce health inequity and improve safety and quality of genetic healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of X-linked inheritance: a new approach for the genome era. Biochemical testing for congenital disorders of glycosylation: A technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Mainstreaming improved adoption of germline testing for Veterans Affairs patients with metastatic prostate cancer without exacerbating disparities. AUTS2-related Syndrome: Insights from a large European cohort. Efficacy of Transitioning from Alglucosidase Alfa to Avalglucosidase Alfa in Infantile-Onset Pompe Disease: A Single-Center Cohort Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1