Ana Beatriz de Souza Albergardi, João Pedro Justino de Oliveira Limírio, Jéssica Marcela de Luna Gomes, Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
{"title":"Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of resin-repaired resin matrix CAD-CAM ceramic: A scoping review","authors":"Ana Beatriz de Souza Albergardi, João Pedro Justino de Oliveira Limírio, Jéssica Marcela de Luna Gomes, Aldiéris Alves Pesqueira, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the existing evidence on surface treatment techniques employed in the repair of resin matrix CAD-CAM ceramics and their effects on short- and long-term bond strength.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>This scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews and was registered on the Open Science Framework platform. Based on the PCC concept, where P: Resin matrix CAD-CAM ceramic blocks for CAD-CAM, C: Bond strength, and C: Surface treatments, a search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Lilacs (grey literature) databases until October 2024, with no language or date restrictions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In vitro studies comparing mechanical and/or chemical surface treatments on the bond strength of resin composite repairs were included. A total of 47 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, of which 45 used both mechanical and chemical treatments, and 29 used chemical treatments alone.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The combination of chemical and mechanical treatments is the appropriate option. Alumina blasting and silica coating are the most commonly used mechanical surface treatments, either alone or in conjunction with chemical treatments. Laser irradiation may serve as an alternative to conventional treatments.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical significance</h3><div>The studies revealed variability among protocols for repairing resin matrix CAD-CAM ceramics, with the combined use of chemical and mechanical treatments being the most effective approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 105594"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225000405","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the existing evidence on surface treatment techniques employed in the repair of resin matrix CAD-CAM ceramics and their effects on short- and long-term bond strength.
Methodology
This scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews and was registered on the Open Science Framework platform. Based on the PCC concept, where P: Resin matrix CAD-CAM ceramic blocks for CAD-CAM, C: Bond strength, and C: Surface treatments, a search was conducted in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Lilacs (grey literature) databases until October 2024, with no language or date restrictions.
Results
In vitro studies comparing mechanical and/or chemical surface treatments on the bond strength of resin composite repairs were included. A total of 47 studies were included in the qualitative analysis, of which 45 used both mechanical and chemical treatments, and 29 used chemical treatments alone.
Conclusion
The combination of chemical and mechanical treatments is the appropriate option. Alumina blasting and silica coating are the most commonly used mechanical surface treatments, either alone or in conjunction with chemical treatments. Laser irradiation may serve as an alternative to conventional treatments.
Clinical significance
The studies revealed variability among protocols for repairing resin matrix CAD-CAM ceramics, with the combined use of chemical and mechanical treatments being the most effective approach.
目的:评价树脂基CAD-CAM陶瓷修复中表面处理技术的现有证据及其对短期和长期结合强度的影响。方法:本次范围审查是按照PRISMA-ScR范围审查指南进行的,并在开放科学框架平台上注册。基于PCC概念,其中P:树脂基体CAD-CAM陶瓷块用于CAD-CAM, C:粘结强度,C:表面处理,在PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus和Lilacs(灰色文献)数据库中进行了搜索,直到2024年10月,没有语言或日期限制。结果:体外研究比较机械和/或化学表面处理对树脂复合修复的结合强度。定性分析共纳入47项研究,其中45项采用机械和化学处理,29项采用单独化学处理。结论:化学与机械联合治疗是较好的选择。氧化铝喷砂和二氧化硅涂层是最常用的机械表面处理,可以单独使用,也可以与化学处理结合使用。激光照射可以作为常规治疗的替代方法。临床意义:研究显示修复树脂基CAD-CAM陶瓷的方案存在差异,化学和机械联合使用是最有效的方法。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis.
Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research.
The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.