Enhancing early detection of keratoconus suspects using interocular corneal tomography asymmetry.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY International Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1007/s10792-025-03423-7
Shuangcheng Li, Yan Huo, Ruisi Xie, Yimei Han, Haohan Zou, Yan Wang
{"title":"Enhancing early detection of keratoconus suspects using interocular corneal tomography asymmetry.","authors":"Shuangcheng Li, Yan Huo, Ruisi Xie, Yimei Han, Haohan Zou, Yan Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10792-025-03423-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate corneal tomography asymmetry of both eyes in keratoconus (KC), keratoconus suspects (KCS), and normal (NL) eyes, and to introduce an interocular asymmetry index (IAI) for early diagnosis of keratoconus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective case-control study included 210 NL eyes, 140 eyes with KCS, and 40 eyes with KC. New Scheimpflug imaging scans were performed to obtain corneal tomographic parameters. Based on the high and low values of tomographic parameters, each eye was categorized as \"worse\" or \"better.\" Intragroup correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to compare interocular asymmetry. Logistic regression indices were constructed using interocular differences. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values of the IAI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the KC group, 86.7% of the parameters significantly differed between the worse and better eyes. In the KCS group, 66.7% of the parameters showed significant differences between the worse and better eyes, with high consistency between the central and thinnest corneal thickness groups (ICC > 0.6). Strong intragroup correlations were observed in the NL group (ICC > 0.6). IAI effectively distinguished the NL from the KCS group (area under the ROC [AUROC] = 0.891), reaching 67.1% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity at a cutoff value of 0.494. At a cutoff value of 0.778, the IAI reached 95.0% sensitivity and 96.2% specificity in distinguishing NL from KC (AUROC = 0.954).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interocular asymmetry in keratoconus suspects can be detected in the early stages, with increased asymmetry compared to NL eyes observed as keratoconus progresses. Interocular asymmetry can complement monocular diagnostic parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03423-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate corneal tomography asymmetry of both eyes in keratoconus (KC), keratoconus suspects (KCS), and normal (NL) eyes, and to introduce an interocular asymmetry index (IAI) for early diagnosis of keratoconus.

Methods: This prospective case-control study included 210 NL eyes, 140 eyes with KCS, and 40 eyes with KC. New Scheimpflug imaging scans were performed to obtain corneal tomographic parameters. Based on the high and low values of tomographic parameters, each eye was categorized as "worse" or "better." Intragroup correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to compare interocular asymmetry. Logistic regression indices were constructed using interocular differences. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to analyze the sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values of the IAI.

Results: In the KC group, 86.7% of the parameters significantly differed between the worse and better eyes. In the KCS group, 66.7% of the parameters showed significant differences between the worse and better eyes, with high consistency between the central and thinnest corneal thickness groups (ICC > 0.6). Strong intragroup correlations were observed in the NL group (ICC > 0.6). IAI effectively distinguished the NL from the KCS group (area under the ROC [AUROC] = 0.891), reaching 67.1% sensitivity and 97.1% specificity at a cutoff value of 0.494. At a cutoff value of 0.778, the IAI reached 95.0% sensitivity and 96.2% specificity in distinguishing NL from KC (AUROC = 0.954).

Conclusion: Interocular asymmetry in keratoconus suspects can be detected in the early stages, with increased asymmetry compared to NL eyes observed as keratoconus progresses. Interocular asymmetry can complement monocular diagnostic parameters.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
期刊最新文献
The role of triglyceride-glucose index in central retinal artery occlusion. Clinico-tomographic-pathological correlation in nodulo-ulcerative ocular surface squamous neoplasia: a study of 16 cases. Exploring the efficacy and safety of neuroprotective agents in optic neuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Agreement between Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Sirius®) and anterior-segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (ANTERİON®) devices for corneal high order aberrations in keratoconic and healthy eyes. Exploring the immunological underpinnings of allergic conjunctivitis: the role of CD4 + T Cells and SLAM expression in ocular surface disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1