Microbiological profiles of infectious corneal ulcers in Derbyshire and North Nottinghamshire-a 10-year analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY International Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1007/s10792-025-03432-6
Balázs Fazekas, Delicia Jayakumar, Harminder Singh Dua, Lana Faraj
{"title":"Microbiological profiles of infectious corneal ulcers in Derbyshire and North Nottinghamshire-a 10-year analysis.","authors":"Balázs Fazekas, Delicia Jayakumar, Harminder Singh Dua, Lana Faraj","doi":"10.1007/s10792-025-03432-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the spectrum of organisms causing microbial keratitis and their in-vitro anti-microbial sensitivities out of 2 hospitals in the East Midlands Region of the United Kingdom.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who underwent corneal scrapes for infectious keratitis between 2011 and 2021 at Royal Derby Hospital (RDH) in Derby and between 2009 and 2021 at King's Mill Hospital in Mansfield.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, the results of 645 corneal scrapes (from 622 patients) were analysed after exclusions. Of these, 307 (47.6%) yielded positive cultures. The mean patient age was 52.6 ± 22.1 years (Mean ± St Dev) across both sites and 332 (51.4%) were from female patients. At RDH, there were 195 positive corneal scrape cultures, from which 250 species of organisms were isolated. At RDH, 64% (160/250) were Gram-positive bacteria, 32% (81/250) were Gram-negative bacteria, 2.4% (6/250) were Acanthamoeba species and 1.2% were fungi (3/250). At KMH, there were 112 positive cultures, from which 128 species of organisms were isolated. 14 corneal scrapes from KMH were polymicrobial. At KMH, 96% (123/128) were bacterial (51% Gram positive, 45% Gram negative), 3/128 (2.3%) were fungi and 2/128 (1.6%) were Acanthamoeba. Sensitivity testing confirmed that the fluoroquinolone class of antibiotics appeared to be effective against the majority isolates across the two hospital sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are differences in microbiological profiles between these neighbouring hospitals covering neighbouring populations. Despite these differences, reassuringly, the current first-line fluoroquinolone monotherapy treatment is an appropriate first-line treatment for both hospital sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03432-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the spectrum of organisms causing microbial keratitis and their in-vitro anti-microbial sensitivities out of 2 hospitals in the East Midlands Region of the United Kingdom.

Methods: A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who underwent corneal scrapes for infectious keratitis between 2011 and 2021 at Royal Derby Hospital (RDH) in Derby and between 2009 and 2021 at King's Mill Hospital in Mansfield.

Results: In total, the results of 645 corneal scrapes (from 622 patients) were analysed after exclusions. Of these, 307 (47.6%) yielded positive cultures. The mean patient age was 52.6 ± 22.1 years (Mean ± St Dev) across both sites and 332 (51.4%) were from female patients. At RDH, there were 195 positive corneal scrape cultures, from which 250 species of organisms were isolated. At RDH, 64% (160/250) were Gram-positive bacteria, 32% (81/250) were Gram-negative bacteria, 2.4% (6/250) were Acanthamoeba species and 1.2% were fungi (3/250). At KMH, there were 112 positive cultures, from which 128 species of organisms were isolated. 14 corneal scrapes from KMH were polymicrobial. At KMH, 96% (123/128) were bacterial (51% Gram positive, 45% Gram negative), 3/128 (2.3%) were fungi and 2/128 (1.6%) were Acanthamoeba. Sensitivity testing confirmed that the fluoroquinolone class of antibiotics appeared to be effective against the majority isolates across the two hospital sites.

Conclusion: There are differences in microbiological profiles between these neighbouring hospitals covering neighbouring populations. Despite these differences, reassuringly, the current first-line fluoroquinolone monotherapy treatment is an appropriate first-line treatment for both hospital sites.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
期刊最新文献
The role of triglyceride-glucose index in central retinal artery occlusion. Clinico-tomographic-pathological correlation in nodulo-ulcerative ocular surface squamous neoplasia: a study of 16 cases. Exploring the efficacy and safety of neuroprotective agents in optic neuritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Agreement between Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Sirius®) and anterior-segment swept-source optical coherence tomography (ANTERİON®) devices for corneal high order aberrations in keratoconic and healthy eyes. Exploring the immunological underpinnings of allergic conjunctivitis: the role of CD4 + T Cells and SLAM expression in ocular surface disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1