Simulation Models for Training in Pediatric General, Thoracic, Plastic, and Urologic Surgery in Low-resource Settings: A Scoping Review

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162183
Lyndon Rebello , Rachel Livergant , Parsa Khanbadr , Olga Bednarek , Shahrzad Joharifard
{"title":"Simulation Models for Training in Pediatric General, Thoracic, Plastic, and Urologic Surgery in Low-resource Settings: A Scoping Review","authors":"Lyndon Rebello ,&nbsp;Rachel Livergant ,&nbsp;Parsa Khanbadr ,&nbsp;Olga Bednarek ,&nbsp;Shahrzad Joharifard","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Simulation is an educational tool that can be used to augment surgical training. We sought to provide an overview of existing pediatric surgical simulation models, with a focus on low-cost models amenable for use in low-resource settings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>PubMed and Google Patents were searched for studies describing simulation models for pediatric surgery. Studies were included if cost, construct validity, face validity, or reproducibility were described, and if the model was either already utilized in low-resource settings or amenable for use in low-resource settings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 18 studies and 7 patents were included. Over half (58.3 %) of the models were created in the last five years. Only four models were created in an upper-middle income country, and none were created in a low or lower-income middle income country (LMIC) (16.7 %). Most models were designed for general pediatric surgical procedures, with esophageal atresia repair being the most common procedure (20.8 %). The cost of models ranged between $0.61 USD to $301.44 USD, and cost per simulation episode ranged from $0.61 to $38 USD. Seven models (41.1 %) were 3D printed. Thirteen models (54.2 %) were simulators for minimally-invasive procedures. Sixteen models (66.7 %) were deemed to be reproducible based on their descriptions in published manuscripts or available patents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The utilization of simulation models in pediatric surgery is growing. Unfortunately, there are few validated models that can be used for training in low-resource settings. Significant work remains to be done on developing educational simulation tools for pediatric surgery in low-resource settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 5","pages":"Article 162183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825000284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Simulation is an educational tool that can be used to augment surgical training. We sought to provide an overview of existing pediatric surgical simulation models, with a focus on low-cost models amenable for use in low-resource settings.

Methods

PubMed and Google Patents were searched for studies describing simulation models for pediatric surgery. Studies were included if cost, construct validity, face validity, or reproducibility were described, and if the model was either already utilized in low-resource settings or amenable for use in low-resource settings.

Results

A total of 18 studies and 7 patents were included. Over half (58.3 %) of the models were created in the last five years. Only four models were created in an upper-middle income country, and none were created in a low or lower-income middle income country (LMIC) (16.7 %). Most models were designed for general pediatric surgical procedures, with esophageal atresia repair being the most common procedure (20.8 %). The cost of models ranged between $0.61 USD to $301.44 USD, and cost per simulation episode ranged from $0.61 to $38 USD. Seven models (41.1 %) were 3D printed. Thirteen models (54.2 %) were simulators for minimally-invasive procedures. Sixteen models (66.7 %) were deemed to be reproducible based on their descriptions in published manuscripts or available patents.

Conclusion

The utilization of simulation models in pediatric surgery is growing. Unfortunately, there are few validated models that can be used for training in low-resource settings. Significant work remains to be done on developing educational simulation tools for pediatric surgery in low-resource settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低资源环境下儿科普通外科、胸外科、整形外科和泌尿外科训练的模拟模型:范围综述。
背景:模拟是一种教育工具,可用于加强外科训练。我们试图提供现有儿科手术模拟模型的概述,重点是适用于低资源环境的低成本模型。方法:检索PubMed和谷歌专利,检索描述儿科外科模拟模型的研究。如果描述了成本、结构效度、面效度或可重复性,并且如果模型已经在低资源环境中使用或适合在低资源环境中使用,则纳入研究。结果:共纳入18项研究和7项专利。超过一半(58.3%)的模型是在最近五年内创建的。只有四个模型是在中高收入国家创建的,没有一个模型是在低收入或低收入中等收入国家(LMIC)创建的(16.7%)。大多数模型是为普通儿科外科手术设计的,食管闭锁修复是最常见的手术(20.8%)。模型的成本在0.61美元到301.44美元之间,每个模拟集的成本在0.61美元到38美元之间。7个模型(41.1%)是3D打印的。13个模型(54.2%)是微创手术的模拟器。16个模型(66.7%)被认为是可复制的,基于它们在已发表的手稿或可获得的专利中的描述。结论:模拟模型在儿科外科中的应用越来越广泛。不幸的是,很少有经过验证的模型可以用于低资源环境下的训练。在低资源环境下,开发儿科外科教育模拟工具仍有重要的工作要做。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
期刊最新文献
Progression of esophageal atresia associated Barrett’s esophagus in adulthood – Is endoscopic surveillance worth it? Is there any difference between surgical and endoscopic interventions related to the outcome of recurrent tracheoesophageal fistulas? A systematic review Post-extraction management of esophageal button battery injuries in children: A scoping review of imaging, ICU admission, and NPO practices Definitive ileostomy in total colonic aganglionosis: results and considerations from a single-center experience A proposal for a scoring system for hemoglobinuria following ethanolamine oleate sclerotherapy in children with venous malformations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1