Beyond ethical guidelines: upholding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance in health and medical research. A scoping review

IF 8.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Journal of Australia Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.5694/mja2.52564
Felicity Collis, Kade Booth, Jamie Bryant, Michelle Kennedy
{"title":"Beyond ethical guidelines: upholding Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance in health and medical research. A scoping review","authors":"Felicity Collis,&nbsp;Kade Booth,&nbsp;Jamie Bryant,&nbsp;Michelle Kennedy","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To examine what ethics approvals are being sought for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and medical research, and to determine what proportion of this research upholds Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance via an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community-controlled human research ethics committee (AHREC) by jurisdiction and funding body type.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Scoping review of all original, peer-reviewed health and medical literature published over a 5-year period (January 2018 to December 2022).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data sources</h3>\n \n <p>Extending on a previous review, the search tool LIt.search was used to access all literature relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and medical research.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>589 eligible publications were included from the parent review, and a further 1703 publications were identified from the updated search. A total of 945 publications were included. A substantial number of ethics approvals were obtained from government-based ethics committees (394, 41.7%). More than half of the publications reported obtaining institutional ethics approval (514, 54.4%). Less than half (400, 42.3%) reported obtaining AHREC approval. Almost one-third of publications were on research that was conducted in states or territories where there is no AHREC (334, 35.3%). Publications did not always report obtaining AHREC approvals, including in jurisdictions where one operates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We found a concerning lack of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance reported in health and medical research. Acknowledging that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethics guidelines and AHRECs were established due to harm caused to communities, these results suggest a high risk, with research not consistently being deemed safe, respectful and beneficial with appropriate AHREC ethics review and approval. We join calls for the establishment of AHRECs in all jurisdictions and nationally. Furthermore, we urge funding bodies and institutions to uphold requirements for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance in research and funding agreements, as well as institutional policies and procedures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"222 S2","pages":"S42-S48"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52564","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To examine what ethics approvals are being sought for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and medical research, and to determine what proportion of this research upholds Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance via an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community-controlled human research ethics committee (AHREC) by jurisdiction and funding body type.

Study design

Scoping review of all original, peer-reviewed health and medical literature published over a 5-year period (January 2018 to December 2022).

Data sources

Extending on a previous review, the search tool LIt.search was used to access all literature relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and medical research.

Results

589 eligible publications were included from the parent review, and a further 1703 publications were identified from the updated search. A total of 945 publications were included. A substantial number of ethics approvals were obtained from government-based ethics committees (394, 41.7%). More than half of the publications reported obtaining institutional ethics approval (514, 54.4%). Less than half (400, 42.3%) reported obtaining AHREC approval. Almost one-third of publications were on research that was conducted in states or territories where there is no AHREC (334, 35.3%). Publications did not always report obtaining AHREC approvals, including in jurisdictions where one operates.

Conclusions

We found a concerning lack of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance reported in health and medical research. Acknowledging that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethics guidelines and AHRECs were established due to harm caused to communities, these results suggest a high risk, with research not consistently being deemed safe, respectful and beneficial with appropriate AHREC ethics review and approval. We join calls for the establishment of AHRECs in all jurisdictions and nationally. Furthermore, we urge funding bodies and institutions to uphold requirements for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethical governance in research and funding agreements, as well as institutional policies and procedures.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越道德准则:在卫生和医学研究方面坚持土著和托雷斯海峡岛民的道德治理。范围审查。
目的:审查土著和托雷斯海峡岛民健康和医学研究正在寻求哪些伦理批准,并通过土著和托雷斯海峡岛民社区控制的人类研究伦理委员会(AHREC)按管辖权和资助机构类型确定该研究中维护土著和托雷斯海峡岛民伦理治理的比例。研究设计:对5年(2018年1月至2022年12月)期间发表的所有同行评议的原始健康和医学文献进行范围审查。数据来源:在先前审查的基础上,使用搜索工具LIt.search检索与土著和托雷斯海峡岛民健康和医学研究有关的所有文献。结果:从母体综述中纳入了589篇符合条件的出版物,并从更新的检索中确定了另外1703篇出版物。共纳入945份出版物。大量伦理批准来自政府伦理委员会(3994份,41.7%)。超过一半的出版物报告获得了机构伦理批准(514份,54.4%)。不到一半(400例,42.3%)报告获得了AHREC批准。几乎三分之一的出版物是在没有AHREC的州或地区进行的研究(334,35.3%)。出版物并不总是报告获得AHREC的批准,包括在其经营的司法管辖区。结论:我们发现,在健康和医学研究中,原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民伦理治理的报道令人担忧。承认原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民的伦理准则和AHREC是由于对社区造成的伤害而建立的,这些结果表明,在适当的AHREC伦理审查和批准下,研究并不总是被认为是安全、尊重和有益的,这是高风险的。我们加入在所有司法管辖区和国家建立AHRECs的呼吁。此外,我们敦促资助机构和机构在研究和资助协议以及机构政策和程序中坚持土著和托雷斯海峡岛民道德治理的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
期刊最新文献
Data for Equity: Can Linked Administrative Data Inform Pathways to More Equitable Child Health? A Diagnostic Headache. Victorian Public Hospitals Go 100% Renewable: Now Let's Replace Gas and Embrace Reusable Equipment. Antidepressant Prescribing in Australian Primary Care: Time to Reevaluate. Ngalaiya Boorai Gabara Budbut: A Qualitative Study With Primary Care Providers to Understand Perceived Needs, Enablers, Barriers and Opportunities to Strengthen Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1