{"title":"Intrafoot Coordination and Its Variability During Walking in Males with and Without Chronic Ankle Instability.","authors":"Takahiro Watanabe, Tomoya Takabayashi, Takanori Kikumoto, Yudai Kikuchi, Masayoshi Kubo","doi":"10.7547/23-203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Investigating the kinematics of copers, who are individuals with no recurrent ankle sprains, is necessary to prevent the development of chronic ankle instability (CAI). Because the \"giving way\" of the ankle joint (episodes of excessive inversion of the rearfoot that do not result in an acute lateral ankle sprain) usually occurs during walking, investigating the intrafoot coordination during walking is necessary. This study aimed to identify intrafoot coordination and its variability in copers while walking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 12 copers, 13 patients with CAI, and ten control patients. The participants were required to walk on a treadmill at a fixed speed of 1.3 m/sec. Using the modified vector coding technique, the coupling angle between the intrafoot joints, representing interjoint coordination, was calculated and categorized into four coordination patterns. The coupling angle standard deviation represented the coordination variability during the stance phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The coordination between the rearfoot and midfoot in the frontal plane showed a significantly lower proportion of antiphase with proximal dominance in the coper group than in the CAI and control groups during midstance (P < .05). Regarding coordination between the midfoot and forefoot in the sagittal plane, the coper group also showed a significantly lower proportion of in-phase coordination with distal dominance than the CAI group during midstance (P < .05). For coordination between the midfoot and forefoot in the frontal plane, the coper group also showed a significantly lower proportion of antiphase with distal dominance than the CAI group during late stance (P < .05).The coordination variability between the sagittal midfoot and forefoot in the coper group was significantly lower than that in the CAI group and similar to that in the control group during midstance (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These differences may explain why copers do not experience ankle sprain recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/23-203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Investigating the kinematics of copers, who are individuals with no recurrent ankle sprains, is necessary to prevent the development of chronic ankle instability (CAI). Because the "giving way" of the ankle joint (episodes of excessive inversion of the rearfoot that do not result in an acute lateral ankle sprain) usually occurs during walking, investigating the intrafoot coordination during walking is necessary. This study aimed to identify intrafoot coordination and its variability in copers while walking.
Methods: The study included 12 copers, 13 patients with CAI, and ten control patients. The participants were required to walk on a treadmill at a fixed speed of 1.3 m/sec. Using the modified vector coding technique, the coupling angle between the intrafoot joints, representing interjoint coordination, was calculated and categorized into four coordination patterns. The coupling angle standard deviation represented the coordination variability during the stance phase.
Results: The coordination between the rearfoot and midfoot in the frontal plane showed a significantly lower proportion of antiphase with proximal dominance in the coper group than in the CAI and control groups during midstance (P < .05). Regarding coordination between the midfoot and forefoot in the sagittal plane, the coper group also showed a significantly lower proportion of in-phase coordination with distal dominance than the CAI group during midstance (P < .05). For coordination between the midfoot and forefoot in the frontal plane, the coper group also showed a significantly lower proportion of antiphase with distal dominance than the CAI group during late stance (P < .05).The coordination variability between the sagittal midfoot and forefoot in the coper group was significantly lower than that in the CAI group and similar to that in the control group during midstance (P < .05).
Conclusions: These differences may explain why copers do not experience ankle sprain recurrence.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.