Topical intranasal anesthesia impairs trigeminal function and airflow perception.

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Rhinology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.4193/Rhin
C Migneault-Bouchard, F J M Boselie, J Frasnelli
{"title":"Topical intranasal anesthesia impairs trigeminal function and airflow perception.","authors":"C Migneault-Bouchard, F J M Boselie, J Frasnelli","doi":"10.4193/Rhin","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Impairment of airflow perception by the intranasal trigeminal system may explain chronic nasal obstruction (CNO),especially in cases where no major deformity or mucosal inflammation can explain reduced airflow. We aim to characterize the effect of topical intranasal anesthesia on intranasal trigeminal sensitivity and consequently the sensation of nasal obstruction.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>We performed a crossover study of 16 healthy subjects, randomised for either treatment (topical intranasal anesthesia with 10% Xylocaine) or placebo (saline solution). We used the Trigeminal Lateralization Task (TLT) with eucalyptol to assess trigeminal sensitivity. We measured nasal patency objectively with Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF), and subjectively with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Empty Nose Syndrome 6-Item Questionnaire (ENS6Q), and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Topical intranasal anesthesia significantly reduced intranasal trigeminal sensitivity. Further, after topical intranasal anesthesia,reduced trigeminal sensitivity was associated with the subjectively reduced nasal patency, as highlighted by ENS6Q and NOSE scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Topical intranasal anesthesia reduces intranasal trigeminal function resulting in subjectively reduced nasal patency. In future studies, the relation of reduced intranasal trigeminal function and subjective nasal obstruction needs to be addressed to open an avenue for potential interventions for an important portion of ENT patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21361,"journal":{"name":"Rhinology","volume":"63 1","pages":"85-91"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Impairment of airflow perception by the intranasal trigeminal system may explain chronic nasal obstruction (CNO),especially in cases where no major deformity or mucosal inflammation can explain reduced airflow. We aim to characterize the effect of topical intranasal anesthesia on intranasal trigeminal sensitivity and consequently the sensation of nasal obstruction.

Methodology: We performed a crossover study of 16 healthy subjects, randomised for either treatment (topical intranasal anesthesia with 10% Xylocaine) or placebo (saline solution). We used the Trigeminal Lateralization Task (TLT) with eucalyptol to assess trigeminal sensitivity. We measured nasal patency objectively with Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF), and subjectively with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Empty Nose Syndrome 6-Item Questionnaire (ENS6Q), and the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire.

Results: Topical intranasal anesthesia significantly reduced intranasal trigeminal sensitivity. Further, after topical intranasal anesthesia,reduced trigeminal sensitivity was associated with the subjectively reduced nasal patency, as highlighted by ENS6Q and NOSE scores.

Conclusions: Topical intranasal anesthesia reduces intranasal trigeminal function resulting in subjectively reduced nasal patency. In future studies, the relation of reduced intranasal trigeminal function and subjective nasal obstruction needs to be addressed to open an avenue for potential interventions for an important portion of ENT patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部鼻内麻醉损害三叉神经功能和气流感知。
背景:鼻内三叉系统的气流感知障碍可以解释慢性鼻塞(CNO),特别是在没有严重畸形或粘膜炎症可以解释气流减少的情况下。我们的目的是表征局部鼻内麻醉对鼻内三叉神经敏感性的影响,从而影响鼻塞的感觉。方法:我们对16名健康受试者进行了交叉研究,随机分为两组,一组治疗(10%木卡因局部鼻内麻醉),另一组为安慰剂(生理盐水溶液)。我们使用三叉神经侧化任务(TLT)与桉树精油来评估三叉神经敏感性。客观上采用鼻吸气流量峰值(PNIF)测量鼻通畅度,主观上采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、空鼻综合征6项问卷(ENS6Q)和鼻塞症状评估问卷(Nose)。结果:局部鼻内麻醉显著降低鼻内三叉神经敏感性。此外,局部鼻内麻醉后,三叉神经敏感性降低与主观上鼻通畅降低相关,ENS6Q和NOSE评分突出了这一点。结论:局部鼻内麻醉降低鼻内三叉神经功能,主观上降低鼻通畅。在未来的研究中,需要进一步研究鼻三叉神经功能降低与主观性鼻塞的关系,为重要部分耳鼻喉科患者的潜在干预开辟道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rhinology
Rhinology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
15.80
自引率
9.70%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Rhinology serves as the official Journal of the International Rhinologic Society and is recognized as one of the journals of the European Rhinologic Society. It offers a prominent platform for disseminating rhinologic research, reviews, position papers, task force reports, and guidelines to an international scientific audience. The journal also boasts the prestigious European Position Paper in Rhinosinusitis (EPOS), a highly influential publication first released in 2005 and subsequently updated in 2007, 2012, and most recently in 2020. Employing a double-blind peer review system, Rhinology welcomes original articles, review articles, and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a real-world prospective cohort study. Chronic rhinosinusitis in a birth cohort: symptom trajectories and early-life risk factors up to young adulthood. Relationship between olfactory function and quality of life in COVID-19 patients. Anterior superior alveolar nerve dysfunction after lateral nasal wall surgery: a prospective observation. Exhaled breath condensate metabolomics reveals conserved networks and bidirectional crosstalk in asthma and CRSwNP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1