Postcompetency Index System for Assessing Pain Resource Nurses’ Competence: A Delphi Study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Pain Management Nursing Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.016
Yi Li R.N. , Gongyin Luo R.N. , Xi Yi R.N. , Xianlin Wang R.N. , Hanrui Qin R.N. , Qian Fang MBBS , Shiming Huang MBBS
{"title":"Postcompetency Index System for Assessing Pain Resource Nurses’ Competence: A Delphi Study","authors":"Yi Li R.N. ,&nbsp;Gongyin Luo R.N. ,&nbsp;Xi Yi R.N. ,&nbsp;Xianlin Wang R.N. ,&nbsp;Hanrui Qin R.N. ,&nbsp;Qian Fang MBBS ,&nbsp;Shiming Huang MBBS","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim was to establish a competency index system for pain resource nurses (PRNs) in China.</div></div><div><h3>Background</h3><div>PRNs play a crucial role in enhancing pain management in Chinese hospitals. Their professional competence significantly impacts the quality of pain management in the hospital. However, a clear evaluation system for assessing the abilities of PRNs is lacking. Establishing a scientific and systematic evaluation system for nurse competencies is essential for selection, training, and assessment within hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Utilizing the iceberg competency model, a competency index for PRNs was developed through literature analysis and semistructured interviews. Two rounds of Delphi consultations were conducted with 19 experts in pain management and medical psychology from 12 provinces in China to establish competency indicators and weight values.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After the Delphi consultations, the postcompetency index system for PRNs comprised 5 primary indices, 15 secondary indices, and 51 tertiary indices. The primary indices include professional theoretical knowledge, practical skills, job execution ability, professional development, and professional attitudes. The effective response rates for the two Delphi rounds were 100% and 84.2%, respectively. The authority coefficient values were 0.89 and 0.91, respectively. The Kendall harmony coefficients for expert opinions were 0.155, 0.212, and 0.188, and 0.524, 0.267, and 0.302 across levels, with statistical significance (<em>p</em> &lt; .05) after consistency testing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The postcompetency index system for PRNs developed in this study is reliable and scientifically grounded. It provides an objective quantitative basis for training and evaluating PRNs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages e278-e286"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152490422400331X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim was to establish a competency index system for pain resource nurses (PRNs) in China.

Background

PRNs play a crucial role in enhancing pain management in Chinese hospitals. Their professional competence significantly impacts the quality of pain management in the hospital. However, a clear evaluation system for assessing the abilities of PRNs is lacking. Establishing a scientific and systematic evaluation system for nurse competencies is essential for selection, training, and assessment within hospitals.

Methods

Utilizing the iceberg competency model, a competency index for PRNs was developed through literature analysis and semistructured interviews. Two rounds of Delphi consultations were conducted with 19 experts in pain management and medical psychology from 12 provinces in China to establish competency indicators and weight values.

Results

After the Delphi consultations, the postcompetency index system for PRNs comprised 5 primary indices, 15 secondary indices, and 51 tertiary indices. The primary indices include professional theoretical knowledge, practical skills, job execution ability, professional development, and professional attitudes. The effective response rates for the two Delphi rounds were 100% and 84.2%, respectively. The authority coefficient values were 0.89 and 0.91, respectively. The Kendall harmony coefficients for expert opinions were 0.155, 0.212, and 0.188, and 0.524, 0.267, and 0.302 across levels, with statistical significance (p < .05) after consistency testing.

Conclusions

The postcompetency index system for PRNs developed in this study is reliable and scientifically grounded. It provides an objective quantitative basis for training and evaluating PRNs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疼痛资源护士胜任后评价指标体系:德尔菲研究。
目的:建立中国疼痛资源护士(prn)的能力指标体系。背景:注册护士在加强我国医院疼痛管理方面发挥着至关重要的作用。他们的专业能力显著影响医院疼痛管理的质量。然而,缺乏一个明确的评价体系来评估注册护士的能力。建立科学、系统的护士胜任力评价体系对医院护士的选拔、培训和考核至关重要。方法:运用冰山胜任力模型,通过文献分析和半结构化访谈等方法,构建注册会计师胜任力指数。对来自中国12个省份的19名疼痛管理和医学心理学专家进行两轮德尔菲咨询,建立胜任力指标和权重值。结果:经德尔菲会诊,注册护士后胜任力指标体系由5个一级指标、15个二级指标和51个三级指标组成。主要指标包括专业理论知识、实践技能、工作执行能力、专业发展和职业态度。两轮德尔菲的有效应答率分别为100%和84.2%。权威系数分别为0.89和0.91。专家意见的肯德尔和谐系数为0.155、0.212、0.188,水平间的肯德尔和谐系数为0.524、0.267、0.302,经一致性检验,差异均有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:本研究构建的注册会计师岗位胜任力指标体系可靠、科学。它为培训和评价注册护士提供了客观的定量依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
期刊最新文献
A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Pain Threshold, Tolerance, and Intensity. Editorial board Table of contents Neuropathic Pain Experience and Self-Management Strategies of Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Managing Allodynia in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: An Integrated Rehabilitation Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1