Early detection and a treatment bundle strategy for postpartum haemorrhage: a mixed-methods process evaluation.

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Lancet Global Health Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00454-6
Meghan A Bohren, Suellen Miller, Kristie-Marie Mammoliti, Hadiza Galadanci, Sue Fawcus, Neil Moran, G Justus Hofmeyr, Zahida Qureshi, Fadhlun Alwy Al-Beity, Gillian Forbes, Shahinoor Akter, Alfred Osoti, George Gwako, Thiago Melo Santos, Cherrie Evans, Aminu Ado Wakili, Maisaratu Bakari, Idris Usman Takai, Mohammad Umar, Mandisa Singata-Madliki, Elani Muller, Sibongile Mandondo, Jenipher Okore, Akwinata Banda, Masumbuko Sambusa, Kulandaipalayam N Sindhu, Leanne Beeson, Christina Louise Easter, Adam Devall, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Fernando Althabe, Olufemi T Oladapo, Ioannis Gallos, Arri Coomarasamy, Fabiana Lorencatto
{"title":"Early detection and a treatment bundle strategy for postpartum haemorrhage: a mixed-methods process evaluation.","authors":"Meghan A Bohren, Suellen Miller, Kristie-Marie Mammoliti, Hadiza Galadanci, Sue Fawcus, Neil Moran, G Justus Hofmeyr, Zahida Qureshi, Fadhlun Alwy Al-Beity, Gillian Forbes, Shahinoor Akter, Alfred Osoti, George Gwako, Thiago Melo Santos, Cherrie Evans, Aminu Ado Wakili, Maisaratu Bakari, Idris Usman Takai, Mohammad Umar, Mandisa Singata-Madliki, Elani Muller, Sibongile Mandondo, Jenipher Okore, Akwinata Banda, Masumbuko Sambusa, Kulandaipalayam N Sindhu, Leanne Beeson, Christina Louise Easter, Adam Devall, A Metin Gülmezoglu, Fernando Althabe, Olufemi T Oladapo, Ioannis Gallos, Arri Coomarasamy, Fabiana Lorencatto","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00454-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postpartum haemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal mortality. A multicountry, cluster-randomised trial (E-MOTIVE) demonstrated a 60% reduction in adverse postpartum haemorrhage outcomes. The E-MOTIVE intervention included early postpartum haemorrhage detection using calibrated blood-collection drapes, followed by a postpartum haemorrhage treatment bundle (ie, uterine massage, oxytocics, tranexamic acid, intravenous fluids, examination and escalation [MOTIVE]), supported by implementation strategies. We report a mixed-methods process evaluation assessing the implementation of the E-MOTIVE intervention in Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, and Tanzania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this mixed-methods process evaluation, data sources were observations of health workers providing clinical care to pregnant women and pregnant people during vaginal birth and postpartum haemorrhage at intervention sites, and surveys and qualitative interviews with health workers at intervention and control sites. Intervention sites received the calibrated drapes, MOTIVE bundle, and implementation strategies and control sites used uncalibrated drapes. Primary implementation outcomes included fidelity, adoption, adaptation, acceptability, feasibility, and contamination to the calibrated drape, MOTIVE bundle, and implementation strategies.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between June 1, 2022, and Jan 31, 2023, 2578 births were observed, 295 pregnant women and people had postpartum haemorrhage, 47 qualitative interviews were done, and 889 surveys were completed. Fidelity to calibrated drape use was high (birth observations 2578 [100%] of 2578; survey 451 [98·3%] of 459). Among health workers, calibrated drape acceptability was high; however, they reported barriers to pregnant women's and people's acceptability. Fidelity to postpartum haemorrhage treatment bundle delivery was high (birth observations 286 [96·9%] of 295), with moderate to high fidelity in median time from postpartum haemorrhage diagnosis to final treatment initiation (≤15 min initiation time in 191 [66·8%] of 295 birth observations, 16-20 min in 42 [14·7%] birth observations), and high acceptability and feasibility. Research midwives participated in clinical assessments after birth and bundle delivery in some sites (mixed fidelity).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This process evaluation shows generally high levels of fidelity, feasibility, and acceptability of the calibrated drape and treatment bundle across evaluation methods and countries. The E-MOTIVE intervention should be included in national policies, with consideration for health workforce, supplies, and medication issues, which might need addressing for successful implementation.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, a co-sponsored programme of WHO.</p><p><strong>Translation: </strong>For the Swahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 2","pages":"e329-e344"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782988/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00454-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postpartum haemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal mortality. A multicountry, cluster-randomised trial (E-MOTIVE) demonstrated a 60% reduction in adverse postpartum haemorrhage outcomes. The E-MOTIVE intervention included early postpartum haemorrhage detection using calibrated blood-collection drapes, followed by a postpartum haemorrhage treatment bundle (ie, uterine massage, oxytocics, tranexamic acid, intravenous fluids, examination and escalation [MOTIVE]), supported by implementation strategies. We report a mixed-methods process evaluation assessing the implementation of the E-MOTIVE intervention in Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, and Tanzania.

Methods: In this mixed-methods process evaluation, data sources were observations of health workers providing clinical care to pregnant women and pregnant people during vaginal birth and postpartum haemorrhage at intervention sites, and surveys and qualitative interviews with health workers at intervention and control sites. Intervention sites received the calibrated drapes, MOTIVE bundle, and implementation strategies and control sites used uncalibrated drapes. Primary implementation outcomes included fidelity, adoption, adaptation, acceptability, feasibility, and contamination to the calibrated drape, MOTIVE bundle, and implementation strategies.

Findings: Between June 1, 2022, and Jan 31, 2023, 2578 births were observed, 295 pregnant women and people had postpartum haemorrhage, 47 qualitative interviews were done, and 889 surveys were completed. Fidelity to calibrated drape use was high (birth observations 2578 [100%] of 2578; survey 451 [98·3%] of 459). Among health workers, calibrated drape acceptability was high; however, they reported barriers to pregnant women's and people's acceptability. Fidelity to postpartum haemorrhage treatment bundle delivery was high (birth observations 286 [96·9%] of 295), with moderate to high fidelity in median time from postpartum haemorrhage diagnosis to final treatment initiation (≤15 min initiation time in 191 [66·8%] of 295 birth observations, 16-20 min in 42 [14·7%] birth observations), and high acceptability and feasibility. Research midwives participated in clinical assessments after birth and bundle delivery in some sites (mixed fidelity).

Interpretation: This process evaluation shows generally high levels of fidelity, feasibility, and acceptability of the calibrated drape and treatment bundle across evaluation methods and countries. The E-MOTIVE intervention should be included in national policies, with consideration for health workforce, supplies, and medication issues, which might need addressing for successful implementation.

Funding: The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, a co-sponsored programme of WHO.

Translation: For the Swahili translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产后出血的早期发现和一揽子治疗策略:混合方法过程评估。
背景:产后出血是孕产妇死亡的主要原因。一项多国、集群随机试验(E-MOTIVE)表明,产后出血不良结局减少60%。E-MOTIVE干预包括使用校准的采血布进行产后早期出血检测,随后进行产后出血治疗(即子宫按摩、催产素、氨甲环酸、静脉输液、检查和升级[MOTIVE]),并辅以实施策略。我们报告了一项对肯尼亚、尼日利亚、南非和坦桑尼亚实施E-MOTIVE干预措施的混合方法过程评估。方法:在这个混合方法的过程评估中,数据来源是对在干预点阴道分娩和产后出血期间为孕妇和孕妇提供临床护理的卫生工作者的观察,以及对干预和对照点卫生工作者的调查和定性访谈。干预点使用校准过的窗帘、MOTIVE捆绑包,实施策略和对照点使用未校准过的窗帘。主要的实施结果包括保真度、采用、适应性、可接受性、可行性和对校准的褶皱、MOTIVE包和实施策略的污染。结果:在2022年6月1日至2023年1月31日期间,共观察了2578例分娩,295例孕妇和产后出血患者,进行了47次定性访谈,完成了889次调查。校准窗帘使用的保真度很高(出生观察2578[100%]的2578;调查451人(459人中的98.3%)。在卫生工作者中,经过校准的窗帘可接受性很高;然而,他们报告了孕妇和人们接受的障碍。产后出血治疗束分娩的保真度高(295例分娩观察286例[96.9%]),产后出血诊断至最终开始治疗的中位时间保真度中高(295例分娩观察191例[66.8%]开始治疗时间≤15 min, 42例[14.7%]开始治疗时间16 ~ 20 min),可接受性和可行性高。研究助产士参加临床评估后出生和束分娩在一些地点(混合保真度)。解释:该过程评估显示,在不同的评估方法和国家中,校准后的布帘和治疗包的保真度、可行性和可接受性普遍较高。E-MOTIVE干预措施应纳入国家政策,同时考虑到卫生人力、供应和药物问题,这些问题可能需要解决才能成功实施。经费:比尔和梅林达·盖茨基金会和开发计划署-人口基金-儿童基金会-卫生组织-世界银行人类生殖研究、发展和研究训练特别方案,这是卫生组织共同赞助的方案。翻译:关于摘要的斯瓦希里语翻译,请参阅补充资料部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
期刊最新文献
Inequities in HIV prevention: strategic access and equity in injectable PrEP distribution The lenacapavir paradox: why a promising prevention tool raises difficult questions about African HIV response priorities Tuberculosis at a crossroads. Prevalence estimates of small vulnerable newborns in China (2012-22): a modelling study. From enumeration to inference: what the Gaza Mortality Survey reveals-and misses-about counting deaths in the Gaza Strip.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1