Palliative patients who may benefit from intranasal delivery of symptomatic drugs: a two-center observational study evaluated the administration of morphine and dexamethasone in Polish hospices.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09189-z
Anna Ingielewicz, Zuzanna Brunka, Mateusz Szczupak, Robert K Szymczak
{"title":"Palliative patients who may benefit from intranasal delivery of symptomatic drugs: a two-center observational study evaluated the administration of morphine and dexamethasone in Polish hospices.","authors":"Anna Ingielewicz, Zuzanna Brunka, Mateusz Szczupak, Robert K Szymczak","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09189-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients receiving hospice care at the end of life often suffer from a variety of ailments. They may need medication to alleviate symptoms for the rest of their lives. The most common and recommended way to take opioids and steroids is orally. Less frequently, the subcutaneous or intravenous routes are used. The intranasal route is a relatively uncommon but interesting alternative for administering drugs.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aims to identify hospice patients who may benefit from changing the standard opioid and steroid administration route to intranasal delivery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The electronic medical records of all home and inpatient hospice patients (both rural and urban) were analyzed between February and April 2024. The study focused on the magnitude and type of problems associated with taking medications via standard routes and assessed the potential for changing to an intranasal route of administration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who were prescribed morphine, dexamethasone, or both during co-administration were included in the analysis. Of the 282 patients receiving hospice care over the study period, 95 met the inclusion criteria (33.7%). According to the researcher's original survey 87% of patients experienced issues with taking medications through the standard route. Among the problems related to oral medicines, consciousness disorders were the most significant at 66%. For subcutaneous administration, the main issues were reluctance to inject at 19% and lack of cooperation from caregivers at 20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The profile of a hospice patient who may benefit from intranasal administration of symptomatic drugs includes patients with impaired consciousness, aversion to subcutaneous injections, and reluctance to administer injections by caregivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 2","pages":"140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09189-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients receiving hospice care at the end of life often suffer from a variety of ailments. They may need medication to alleviate symptoms for the rest of their lives. The most common and recommended way to take opioids and steroids is orally. Less frequently, the subcutaneous or intravenous routes are used. The intranasal route is a relatively uncommon but interesting alternative for administering drugs.

Aim: The study aims to identify hospice patients who may benefit from changing the standard opioid and steroid administration route to intranasal delivery.

Material and methods: The electronic medical records of all home and inpatient hospice patients (both rural and urban) were analyzed between February and April 2024. The study focused on the magnitude and type of problems associated with taking medications via standard routes and assessed the potential for changing to an intranasal route of administration.

Results: Patients who were prescribed morphine, dexamethasone, or both during co-administration were included in the analysis. Of the 282 patients receiving hospice care over the study period, 95 met the inclusion criteria (33.7%). According to the researcher's original survey 87% of patients experienced issues with taking medications through the standard route. Among the problems related to oral medicines, consciousness disorders were the most significant at 66%. For subcutaneous administration, the main issues were reluctance to inject at 19% and lack of cooperation from caregivers at 20%.

Conclusion: The profile of a hospice patient who may benefit from intranasal administration of symptomatic drugs includes patients with impaired consciousness, aversion to subcutaneous injections, and reluctance to administer injections by caregivers.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缓解病人可能受益于鼻内给药:一项两中心观察性研究评估了吗啡和地塞米松在波兰临终关怀医院的给药。
简介:临终病人接受临终关怀时,往往会受到各种疾病的折磨。在他们的余生中,他们可能需要药物来缓解症状。服用阿片类药物和类固醇最常见和推荐的方法是口服。较少使用皮下或静脉注射途径。鼻内途径是一种相对少见但有趣的给药途径。目的:本研究旨在确定安宁疗护病人可能从改变标准阿片类药物和类固醇给药途径至鼻内给药获益。材料与方法:分析2024年2 - 4月所有居家和住院安宁疗护病人(城乡)的电子病历。该研究的重点是与通过标准途径服药相关的问题的程度和类型,并评估了改变为鼻内给药途径的可能性。结果:同时使用吗啡、地塞米松或两者同时使用的患者被纳入分析。在研究期间接受安宁疗护的282名患者中,95名符合纳入标准(33.7%)。根据研究人员最初的调查,87%的患者在通过标准途径服药时遇到了问题。在与口服药物有关的问题中,意识障碍最为显著,占66%。对于皮下给药,主要问题是不愿注射(19%)和护理人员缺乏合作(20%)。结论:可能受益于鼻内给药对症药物的安宁疗护病人包括意识受损、厌恶皮下注射、以及看护者不愿给药的病人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Perceived Ostomy odor and body image disturbance in colorectal cancer survivors: differences by ostomy status and sex. Preferences of healthcare providers regarding future follow-up care for breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer: A discrete choice experiment. Delirium severity trajectories and survival outcome in palliative care patients. The role of wearable technologies in supporting physical and psychosocial health outcomes among breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Cannabis stigma and symptom management considerations in cancer survivors: a mixed-methods exploration of patient perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1