How does activity context relate to parents’ responses to preschoolers’ errors and correct math statements?

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106191
Can Çarkoğlu, Sarah H. Eason
{"title":"How does activity context relate to parents’ responses to preschoolers’ errors and correct math statements?","authors":"Can Çarkoğlu,&nbsp;Sarah H. Eason","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research shows that parent–child math activities in the home positively relate to children’s math learning. Although there is evidence suggesting that the nature of parent guidance during these interactions is important for children’s math learning, it is unclear how parents respond to preschoolers’ errors and correct math statements and whether responses vary across activity contexts. We examined parents’ responses to errors and correct statements during structured math activities with 49 dyads of parents and 4- and 5-year-olds. Dyads were assigned to either an Informal Learning condition (<em>n</em> = 25) or a Formal Learning condition (<em>n</em> = 24). We identified instances where children responded correctly or incorrectly to math prompts and coded parents’ feedback based on the extent to which it supported children’s autonomy and learning. Overall, parents most frequently responded in ways that encouraged children’s continued math engagement and thinking (elaborative guidance). However, multiple regression analyses revealed that parents were more likely to not respond to errors during informal learning than during formal learning, and parents were more likely to give the correct answer following an error during formal learning compared with during informal learning. Parents in both conditions were equally likely to offer elaborative support following errors. Moreover, parents did not differ in their responses following children’s correct statements across conditions. These findings suggest, irrespective of activity context, that parents can realize opportunities to effectively support preschoolers’ math learning. Yet, given differences in parents’ responses to errors, the findings have implications as to how we can tailor recommendations to promote high-quality parent–child math interactions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 106191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002209652400331X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research shows that parent–child math activities in the home positively relate to children’s math learning. Although there is evidence suggesting that the nature of parent guidance during these interactions is important for children’s math learning, it is unclear how parents respond to preschoolers’ errors and correct math statements and whether responses vary across activity contexts. We examined parents’ responses to errors and correct statements during structured math activities with 49 dyads of parents and 4- and 5-year-olds. Dyads were assigned to either an Informal Learning condition (n = 25) or a Formal Learning condition (n = 24). We identified instances where children responded correctly or incorrectly to math prompts and coded parents’ feedback based on the extent to which it supported children’s autonomy and learning. Overall, parents most frequently responded in ways that encouraged children’s continued math engagement and thinking (elaborative guidance). However, multiple regression analyses revealed that parents were more likely to not respond to errors during informal learning than during formal learning, and parents were more likely to give the correct answer following an error during formal learning compared with during informal learning. Parents in both conditions were equally likely to offer elaborative support following errors. Moreover, parents did not differ in their responses following children’s correct statements across conditions. These findings suggest, irrespective of activity context, that parents can realize opportunities to effectively support preschoolers’ math learning. Yet, given differences in parents’ responses to errors, the findings have implications as to how we can tailor recommendations to promote high-quality parent–child math interactions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活动情境与父母对学龄前儿童错误和正确数学陈述的反应有何关系?
研究表明,家庭亲子数学活动与儿童数学学习呈正相关。尽管有证据表明,在这些互动过程中,父母指导的性质对儿童的数学学习很重要,但尚不清楚父母如何回应学龄前儿童的错误和纠正数学陈述,以及反应是否因活动环境而异。我们调查了49对父母和4、5岁的孩子在结构化数学活动中对错误和正确陈述的反应。二人组被分配到非正式学习条件(n = 25)或正式学习条件(n = 24)。我们确定了孩子对数学提示做出正确或错误反应的情况,并根据家长的反馈对孩子自主和学习的支持程度对其进行编码。总的来说,父母最经常的回应方式是鼓励孩子持续的数学参与和思考(精细化指导)。然而,多元回归分析显示,父母在非正式学习过程中比在正式学习过程中更容易对错误做出反应,并且父母在正式学习过程中比在非正式学习过程中更容易在错误后给出正确答案。两种情况下的父母在错误发生后提供详细支持的可能性是一样的。此外,父母在不同条件下对孩子正确陈述的反应没有差异。这些发现表明,无论活动背景如何,父母都可以找到有效支持学龄前儿童数学学习的机会。然而,鉴于父母对错误的反应不同,研究结果对我们如何定制建议以促进高质量的亲子数学互动具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
Bidirectional associations between self-regulation, social-emotional skills and mathematics in preschoolers: the interplay with teacher-child relationships The development of essentialist beliefs about social status categories in China Do picture books affect counting directionality in preliterate children? Developmental course and potential mechanisms Written or drawn episodic future thinking cues improves delay discounting in children Children’s motivational beliefs in math, verbal, and spatial domains: Relations to gender, grade level, and achievement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1