Acetabular component position significantly influences the rebalancing of pelvic sagittal inclination following total hip arthroplasty in patients with Crowe type III/IV developmental dysplasia of the hip.

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0485.R1
Han Du, Han Qiao, Zan-Jing Zhai, Jing-Wei Zhang, Hui-Wu Li, Yuan-Qing Mao, Zhen-An Zhu, Jie Zhao, De-Gang Yu, Chang-Qing Zhao
{"title":"Acetabular component position significantly influences the rebalancing of pelvic sagittal inclination following total hip arthroplasty in patients with Crowe type III/IV developmental dysplasia of the hip.","authors":"Han Du, Han Qiao, Zan-Jing Zhai, Jing-Wei Zhang, Hui-Wu Li, Yuan-Qing Mao, Zhen-An Zhu, Jie Zhao, De-Gang Yu, Chang-Qing Zhao","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0485.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Sagittal lumbar pelvic alignment alters with posterior pelvic tilt (PT) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The individual value of pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) following rebalancing of lumbar-pelvic alignment is unknown. In different populations, PT regresses in a linear relationship with pelvic incidence (PI). PSI and PT have a direct relationship to each other via a fixed individual angle ∠γ. This study aimed to investigate whether the new PI created by acetabular component positioning during THA also has a linear regression relationship with PT/PSI when lumbar-pelvic alignment rebalances postoperatively in patients with Crowe type III/IV DDH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using SPINEPARA software, we measured the pelvic sagittal parameters including PI, PT, and PSI in 61 patients with Crowe III/IV DDH. Both PSI and PT represent the pelvic tilt state, and the difference between their values is ∠γ (PT = PSI + ∠γ). The regression equation between PI and PT at one year after THA was established. By substituting ∠γ, the relationship between PI and PSI was also established. The Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the consistency between the PSI calculated by the linear regression equation (ePSI) and the actual PSI (aPSI) measured one year postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean PT and PSI changed from preoperative values of 7.0° (SD 6.5°) and -8.0° (SD 6.7°), respectively, to 8.4° (SD 5.5°) and -4.5° (SD 5.9°) at one year postoperatively. This change shows that the pelvis tilted posteriorly following THA. In addition, when lumbar-pelvic alignment rebalanced, the linear regression equation between PI and PT was PT = 0.45 × PI - 10.5°, and PSI could be expressed as PSI = 0.45 × PI - 10.5° - ∠γ. The absolute difference between ePSI and aPSI was less than 5° in 55 of 61 patients (90.16%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The new PI created by the positioning of the acetabular component significantly affects the PSI when lumbar-pelvic alignment changes and rebalances after THA in patients with Crowe III/IV DDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 2","pages":"149-156"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0485.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Sagittal lumbar pelvic alignment alters with posterior pelvic tilt (PT) following total hip arthroplasty (THA) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The individual value of pelvic sagittal inclination (PSI) following rebalancing of lumbar-pelvic alignment is unknown. In different populations, PT regresses in a linear relationship with pelvic incidence (PI). PSI and PT have a direct relationship to each other via a fixed individual angle ∠γ. This study aimed to investigate whether the new PI created by acetabular component positioning during THA also has a linear regression relationship with PT/PSI when lumbar-pelvic alignment rebalances postoperatively in patients with Crowe type III/IV DDH.

Methods: Using SPINEPARA software, we measured the pelvic sagittal parameters including PI, PT, and PSI in 61 patients with Crowe III/IV DDH. Both PSI and PT represent the pelvic tilt state, and the difference between their values is ∠γ (PT = PSI + ∠γ). The regression equation between PI and PT at one year after THA was established. By substituting ∠γ, the relationship between PI and PSI was also established. The Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the consistency between the PSI calculated by the linear regression equation (ePSI) and the actual PSI (aPSI) measured one year postoperatively.

Results: The mean PT and PSI changed from preoperative values of 7.0° (SD 6.5°) and -8.0° (SD 6.7°), respectively, to 8.4° (SD 5.5°) and -4.5° (SD 5.9°) at one year postoperatively. This change shows that the pelvis tilted posteriorly following THA. In addition, when lumbar-pelvic alignment rebalanced, the linear regression equation between PI and PT was PT = 0.45 × PI - 10.5°, and PSI could be expressed as PSI = 0.45 × PI - 10.5° - ∠γ. The absolute difference between ePSI and aPSI was less than 5° in 55 of 61 patients (90.16%).

Conclusion: The new PI created by the positioning of the acetabular component significantly affects the PSI when lumbar-pelvic alignment changes and rebalances after THA in patients with Crowe III/IV DDH.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋臼假体位置显著影响Crowe III/IV型髋关节发育不良患者全髋关节置换术后骨盆矢状倾斜的再平衡。
目的:髋发育不良(DDH)全髋关节置换术(THA)后骨盆后倾(PT)改变矢状腰椎骨盆对准。骨盆矢状倾角(PSI)的个体价值在腰椎-骨盆对齐后的再平衡是未知的。在不同人群中,PT与骨盆发病率呈线性回归关系。PSI和PT通过一个固定的单独角∠γ直接相接。本研究旨在探讨Crowe III/IV型DDH患者术后腰骨盆线重新平衡时,THA期间髋臼假体定位产生的新PI是否与PT/PSI存在线性回归关系。方法:采用SPINEPARA软件测量61例Crowe III/IV DDH患者的骨盆矢状面参数,包括PI、PT和PSI。PSI与PT均表示骨盆倾斜状态,其值之差为∠γ (PT = PSI +∠γ)。建立THA术后1年PI与PT的回归方程。通过代入∠γ,建立了PI与PSI之间的关系式。采用Bland-Altman方法评价线性回归方程(ePSI)计算的PSI与术后1年实际PSI (aPSI)的一致性。结果:平均PT和PSI分别从术前的7.0°(SD 6.5°)和-8.0°(SD 6.7°)变化到术后1年的8.4°(SD 5.5°)和-4.5°(SD 5.9°)。这一变化表明髋关节置换术后骨盆向后倾斜。另外,当腰骨盆对线重新平衡时,PI与PT之间的线性回归方程为PT = 0.45 × PI - 10.5°,PSI可表示为PSI = 0.45 × PI - 10.5°-∠γ。61例患者中有55例(90.16%)ePSI与aPSI的绝对差异小于5°。结论:当Crowe III/IV DDH患者THA后腰骨盆对线改变和再平衡时,髋臼组件定位产生的新PI显著影响PSI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Bone cements: strengthening oversight. Supervised versus self-managed rehabilitation for patients with an acute first-time or recurrent patellar dislocation: the Physiotherapy Rehabilitation Post Patellar Dislocation (PRePPeD) external pilot randomized controlled trial and embedded qualitative study. Total hip arthroplasty with dual-mobility components : a retrospective series of 25,545 primary cases. The impact of unhelpful pain beliefs on patient outcomes after surgically managed ankle fractures : an embedded observational study. Suture button compared with ventral augmentation in unstable syndesmotic injuries : does it affect the quality of distal tibiofibular joint reduction?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1