Safety and efficacy of combined intra-articular administration of vancomycin and ε-aminocaproic acid in total hip arthroplasty : a clinical study.

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Journal Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0232.R2
Mingwei Hu, Yifan Zhang, Cuicui Guo, Xue Yang, Hao Xu, Shuai Xiang
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of combined intra-articular administration of vancomycin and ε-aminocaproic acid in total hip arthroplasty : a clinical study.","authors":"Mingwei Hu, Yifan Zhang, Cuicui Guo, Xue Yang, Hao Xu, Shuai Xiang","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0232.R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the concurrent use of vancomycin and ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 120 patients undergoing unilateral primary THA were divided into three groups: Group VE received intra-articular vancomycin and EACA; Group V received only intra-articular vancomycin; and Group E received only intra-articular EACA. Blood and joint fluids were sampled postoperatively to measure the vancomycin levels using chromatography. Blood loss and kidney function were monitored.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Groups E and VE had equivalent blood loss, which was less than that in Group V. Intra-articular vancomycin levels were higher in Group VE at all intervals, with similar serum levels across the groups. Acute kidney injury, ototoxicity, and allergies were not observed, nor was a difference in rates of periprosthetic joint infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adding intra-articular EACA to vancomycin did not affect intra-articular vancomycin levels, and maintained EACA's antifibrinolytic effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"107-B 2","pages":"157-163"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.107B2.BJJ-2024-0232.R2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the concurrent use of vancomycin and ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods: In total, 120 patients undergoing unilateral primary THA were divided into three groups: Group VE received intra-articular vancomycin and EACA; Group V received only intra-articular vancomycin; and Group E received only intra-articular EACA. Blood and joint fluids were sampled postoperatively to measure the vancomycin levels using chromatography. Blood loss and kidney function were monitored.

Results: Groups E and VE had equivalent blood loss, which was less than that in Group V. Intra-articular vancomycin levels were higher in Group VE at all intervals, with similar serum levels across the groups. Acute kidney injury, ototoxicity, and allergies were not observed, nor was a difference in rates of periprosthetic joint infection.

Conclusion: Adding intra-articular EACA to vancomycin did not affect intra-articular vancomycin levels, and maintained EACA's antifibrinolytic effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
万古霉素和ε-氨基己酸关节内联合应用于全髋关节置换术的安全性和有效性:临床研究。
目的:探讨万古霉素与ε-氨基己酸(EACA)在初次全髋关节置换术(THA)中的联合应用。方法:120例单侧原发性THA患者分为3组:VE组关节内万古霉素和EACA;V组仅关节内注射万古霉素;E组仅接受关节内EACA治疗。术后采集血液和关节液,用色谱法测定万古霉素水平。监测出血量和肾功能。结果:E组与VE组失血量相当,均小于v组。VE组关节内万古霉素水平在各时间间隔均较高,各组血清万古霉素水平相似。没有观察到急性肾损伤、耳毒性和过敏,假体周围关节感染的发生率也没有差异。结论:万古霉素关节内添加EACA不影响万古霉素关节内水平,维持了EACA的抗纤溶作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Supervised versus self-managed rehabilitation for patients with an acute first-time or recurrent patellar dislocation: the Physiotherapy Rehabilitation Post Patellar Dislocation (PRePPeD) external pilot randomized controlled trial and embedded qualitative study. Total hip arthroplasty with dual-mobility components : a retrospective series of 25,545 primary cases. The impact of unhelpful pain beliefs on patient outcomes after surgically managed ankle fractures : an embedded observational study. Suture button compared with ventral augmentation in unstable syndesmotic injuries : does it affect the quality of distal tibiofibular joint reduction? The Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome Score (SuCESS) : development and validation of a clinical triage tool.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1