Perspectives of family physician educators on shared decision making in preventive health care: A Qualitative Descriptive Inquiry

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Patient Education and Counseling Pub Date : 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2025.108681
Roland Grad , Amrita Sandhu , Dorsa Majdpour , Sarah Kitner , Charo Rodriguez , Glyn Elwyn
{"title":"Perspectives of family physician educators on shared decision making in preventive health care: A Qualitative Descriptive Inquiry","authors":"Roland Grad ,&nbsp;Amrita Sandhu ,&nbsp;Dorsa Majdpour ,&nbsp;Sarah Kitner ,&nbsp;Charo Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Glyn Elwyn","doi":"10.1016/j.pec.2025.108681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the views of family physician (FP) educators on shared decision making (SDM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Qualitative descriptive study. Individual interviews were recorded with FPs in active practice who were also educators of Family Medicine residents. Data were analyzed following the phases of practical thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>15 practicing FP educators in a clinic setting were interviewed; nine female and six male FPs with practice experience averaging 19 years. We identified five themes, which we then grouped in two major categories: (i) Conceptual ideas about SDM and (ii) Challenges in putting SDM into practice. In the conceptual idea category: (1) Participants held different understandings of SDM and did not have consensus about when SDM should be achieved in clinical practice <em>(difficulty conceptualizing what SDM is, understanding of SDM changes over time, SDM requires clinical equipoise)</em>. (2) Participants identified why SDM is important <em>(patient-centred care)</em>. Themes in the putting SDM into practice category (ii) were: (3) When to engage in SDM is influenced by multiple factors <em>(system factors, research-based evidence)</em> as well as (4) patient factors <em>(social or contextual factors, discordance or misalignment between doctor and patient on a specific decision, patient safety)</em>. (5) Resources and strategies are needed to put SDM into action.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An inconsistent understanding of SDM among FP educators, as well as several other challenges, helps explain why SDM has been difficult to implement in practice.</div></div><div><h3>Practice implications</h3><div>Physician educators will appreciate how this study unveils challenges to enhancing resident training for the use of SDM in primary care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49714,"journal":{"name":"Patient Education and Counseling","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 108681"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Education and Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399125000485","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To explore the views of family physician (FP) educators on shared decision making (SDM).

Methods

Qualitative descriptive study. Individual interviews were recorded with FPs in active practice who were also educators of Family Medicine residents. Data were analyzed following the phases of practical thematic analysis.

Results

15 practicing FP educators in a clinic setting were interviewed; nine female and six male FPs with practice experience averaging 19 years. We identified five themes, which we then grouped in two major categories: (i) Conceptual ideas about SDM and (ii) Challenges in putting SDM into practice. In the conceptual idea category: (1) Participants held different understandings of SDM and did not have consensus about when SDM should be achieved in clinical practice (difficulty conceptualizing what SDM is, understanding of SDM changes over time, SDM requires clinical equipoise). (2) Participants identified why SDM is important (patient-centred care). Themes in the putting SDM into practice category (ii) were: (3) When to engage in SDM is influenced by multiple factors (system factors, research-based evidence) as well as (4) patient factors (social or contextual factors, discordance or misalignment between doctor and patient on a specific decision, patient safety). (5) Resources and strategies are needed to put SDM into action.

Conclusion

An inconsistent understanding of SDM among FP educators, as well as several other challenges, helps explain why SDM has been difficult to implement in practice.

Practice implications

Physician educators will appreciate how this study unveils challenges to enhancing resident training for the use of SDM in primary care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭医生教育者对预防保健共同决策的看法:定性描述调查。
目的:探讨家庭医生教育工作者对共同决策(SDM)的看法。方法:定性描述性研究。个别访谈记录了活跃执业的家庭医生,他们也是家庭医学住院医师的教育者。在实际专题分析阶段对数据进行了分析。结果:访谈了15名临床执业计划生育教育者;9名女性和6名男性注册会计师,平均执业经验为19年。我们确定了五个主题,然后将其分为两大类:(i)关于SDM的概念思想和(ii)将SDM付诸实践的挑战。在概念观念方面:(1)被试对SDM的理解不同,在临床实践中何时实现SDM没有达成共识(难以概念化SDM是什么,对SDM的理解随时间而变化,SDM需要临床平衡)。(2)参与者确定SDM重要的原因(以患者为中心的护理)。将SDM付诸实践类别(ii)的主题是:(3)何时参与SDM受到多种因素(系统因素、基于研究的证据)以及(4)患者因素(社会或背景因素、医生和患者在特定决策上的不一致或不一致、患者安全)的影响。(5)落实SDM需要资源和战略。结论:计划生育教育者对SDM的理解不一致,以及其他一些挑战,有助于解释为什么SDM在实践中难以实施。实践意义:医师教育者将欣赏这项研究如何揭示在初级保健中使用SDM加强住院医师培训的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Education and Counseling
Patient Education and Counseling 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Patient Education and Counseling is an interdisciplinary, international journal for patient education and health promotion researchers, managers and clinicians. The journal seeks to explore and elucidate the educational, counseling and communication models in health care. Its aim is to provide a forum for fundamental as well as applied research, and to promote the study of organizational issues involved with the delivery of patient education, counseling, health promotion services and training models in improving communication between providers and patients.
期刊最新文献
Medical providers and biogenetic messages about depression: A vignette experiment Teach-back techniques in telehealth: A review and insights for future directions Decision‐making delays in endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke: A qualitative study of perspectives from family surrogates, physicians, and nurses Expanding horizons: Introducing PEC Global This wasn’t the first time I had heard those words as a third-year medical student: “You have breast cancer”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1