Clinicopathological Significance of Extranodal Extension in Hypopharyngeal and Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1002/hed.28090
Natsumi Kijima, Yui Uzawa, Yuri Hirai, Yusuke Nojima, Jun Aoyama, Hideaki Takahashi, Yasuhiro Arai, Daisuke Sano, Goshi Nishimura, Nobuhiko Oridate, Satoshi Fujii
{"title":"Clinicopathological Significance of Extranodal Extension in Hypopharyngeal and Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma","authors":"Natsumi Kijima,&nbsp;Yui Uzawa,&nbsp;Yuri Hirai,&nbsp;Yusuke Nojima,&nbsp;Jun Aoyama,&nbsp;Hideaki Takahashi,&nbsp;Yasuhiro Arai,&nbsp;Daisuke Sano,&nbsp;Goshi Nishimura,&nbsp;Nobuhiko Oridate,&nbsp;Satoshi Fujii","doi":"10.1002/hed.28090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The AJCC cutoff value of 2 mm for the extranodal extension (ENE) distance was determined from an analysis of patients with or without adjuvant therapy. The purpose of this study was to find out the ENE distance that reflects prognosis only in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who received adjuvant therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The ENE distance was defined for 109 patients who underwent surgery for SCC of larynx or hypopharynx as a primary tumor.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>To standardize patient conditions, only 26 patients who received additional postoperative treatment were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the ENE distance for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) yielded a cutoff value of 4250 μm. Multivariate analysis showed that the ENE distance was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS and RFS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The optimal ENE distance cutoff for OS and RFS in postoperatively treated patients was 4250 μm.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55072,"journal":{"name":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","volume":"47 6","pages":"1769-1778"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hed.28090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The AJCC cutoff value of 2 mm for the extranodal extension (ENE) distance was determined from an analysis of patients with or without adjuvant therapy. The purpose of this study was to find out the ENE distance that reflects prognosis only in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who received adjuvant therapy.

Methods

The ENE distance was defined for 109 patients who underwent surgery for SCC of larynx or hypopharynx as a primary tumor.

Results

To standardize patient conditions, only 26 patients who received additional postoperative treatment were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the ENE distance for overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) yielded a cutoff value of 4250 μm. Multivariate analysis showed that the ENE distance was an independent poor prognostic factor for OS and RFS.

Conclusion

The optimal ENE distance cutoff for OS and RFS in postoperatively treated patients was 4250 μm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下咽喉部鳞癌结外延伸的临床病理意义。
背景:结外延伸(ENE)距离的AJCC截断值2mm是通过对接受或未接受辅助治疗的患者的分析确定的。本研究的目的是寻找仅能反映头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCC)辅助治疗患者预后的ENE距离。方法:对109例喉部或下咽鳞状细胞癌作为原发肿瘤接受手术的患者确定ENE距离。结果:为了规范患者情况,我们只分析了26例接受术后额外治疗的患者。总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)的ENE距离的接受者工作特征分析得出的截止值为4250 μm。多因素分析显示,ENE距离是OS和RFS的独立不良预后因素。结论:术后OS和RFS的最佳ENE距离临界值为4250 μm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
278
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Head & Neck is an international multidisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck. This area involves the overlapping interests and expertise of several surgical and medical specialties, including general surgery, neurosurgery, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, oral surgery, dermatology, ophthalmology, pathology, radiotherapy, medical oncology, and the corresponding basic sciences.
期刊最新文献
Postoperative and Functional Outcomes of Oropharyngectomy in Irradiated Neck for Recurrent or Metachronous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Vitamin D Pretreatment to Prevent the Risk of Postoperative Hypocalcemic Complications After Parathyroidectomy in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Disparity in the Markers of Affordability Across Targeted- and Immune-Therapy Drugs Used in Head and Neck Cancers. Microsurgical Transcervical Styloidectomy for Eagle Syndrome: Illustrative Case Report With Intraoperative Documentation. Assessing the Risk of Postoperative Hemorrhage With NSAID Use After Transoral Robotic Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1