Francesco Schietroma, Maria Bensi, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Carmelo Pozzo, Michele Basso, Giustina Valente, Giulia Caira, Giovanni Trovato, Alexia Spring, Viria Beccia, Anna Ceccarelli, Serena Perazzo, Laura Chiofalo, Brunella Barbaro, Giulia Tatulli, Sergio Alfieri, Davide De Sio, Laura Lorenzon, Roberto Persiani, Filippo Lococo, Dania Nachira, Felice Giuliante, Francesco Ardito, Francesco Cellini, Giulia Panza, Valerio Cozza, Francesco Giovinazzo, Donato Paolo Pafundi, Luigi Sofo, Francesco Santullo, Vincenzo Tondolo, Giampaolo Tortora, Lisa Salvatore
{"title":"The Impact of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MDTB) in the Management of Colorectal Cancer (CRC).","authors":"Francesco Schietroma, Maria Bensi, Maria Alessandra Calegari, Carmelo Pozzo, Michele Basso, Giustina Valente, Giulia Caira, Giovanni Trovato, Alexia Spring, Viria Beccia, Anna Ceccarelli, Serena Perazzo, Laura Chiofalo, Brunella Barbaro, Giulia Tatulli, Sergio Alfieri, Davide De Sio, Laura Lorenzon, Roberto Persiani, Filippo Lococo, Dania Nachira, Felice Giuliante, Francesco Ardito, Francesco Cellini, Giulia Panza, Valerio Cozza, Francesco Giovinazzo, Donato Paolo Pafundi, Luigi Sofo, Francesco Santullo, Vincenzo Tondolo, Giampaolo Tortora, Lisa Salvatore","doi":"10.1016/j.clcc.2025.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex process. Defining the disease burden, assessing the radiological response and identifying the right time for surgery or other locoregional treatments are crucial factors which can require the involvement of a multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) comprising several specialists. This study investigates the impact of MDTB on management of CRC in our institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed all cases discussed by our MDTB between September 2019 and April 2023. In particular, we collected data concerning radiology, surgery and radiotherapy indication before and after MDTB meetings. The primary endpoint was the overall rate of discrepancy between pre- and post-discussion evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis involved 1150 cases. Median age was 64 years (16-90), 629 patients (54.7%) were male and 915 (79.5%) had metastatic disease at the time of the relevant MDTB discussion. After the meetings, 325 treatment decisions were modified, producing an overall discrepancy rate of 28.3%. In particular: (1) of 648 cases discussed for radiological assessment, 156 decisions (24.1%) were altered after a central imaging review; (2) of 327 cases considered for surgical approach, treatment strategy changed in 118 (36.1%); and (3) of the 160 cases discussed regarding radiotherapy, the treatment strategy changed in 51 of them (31.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our analysis shows significant discrepancies between the radiology and locoregional evaluations from both before and after the MDTB meetings. Our results highlight that the discussions of a MDTB can considerably change the management of CRC, maximizing the treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":93939,"journal":{"name":"Clinical colorectal cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical colorectal cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2025.01.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The management of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex process. Defining the disease burden, assessing the radiological response and identifying the right time for surgery or other locoregional treatments are crucial factors which can require the involvement of a multidisciplinary tumor board (MDTB) comprising several specialists. This study investigates the impact of MDTB on management of CRC in our institution.
Methods: We retrospectively assessed all cases discussed by our MDTB between September 2019 and April 2023. In particular, we collected data concerning radiology, surgery and radiotherapy indication before and after MDTB meetings. The primary endpoint was the overall rate of discrepancy between pre- and post-discussion evaluations.
Results: Our analysis involved 1150 cases. Median age was 64 years (16-90), 629 patients (54.7%) were male and 915 (79.5%) had metastatic disease at the time of the relevant MDTB discussion. After the meetings, 325 treatment decisions were modified, producing an overall discrepancy rate of 28.3%. In particular: (1) of 648 cases discussed for radiological assessment, 156 decisions (24.1%) were altered after a central imaging review; (2) of 327 cases considered for surgical approach, treatment strategy changed in 118 (36.1%); and (3) of the 160 cases discussed regarding radiotherapy, the treatment strategy changed in 51 of them (31.9%).
Conclusions: Our analysis shows significant discrepancies between the radiology and locoregional evaluations from both before and after the MDTB meetings. Our results highlight that the discussions of a MDTB can considerably change the management of CRC, maximizing the treatment strategy.