Emergency medicine updates: Evaluation and diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.055
Brit Long MD , Michael Gottlieb MD
{"title":"Emergency medicine updates: Evaluation and diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock","authors":"Brit Long MD ,&nbsp;Michael Gottlieb MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Sepsis and septic shock are common conditions evaluated and managed in the emergency department (ED), and these conditions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There have been several recent updates in the literature, including guidelines, on the evaluation and diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This is the first paper in a two-part series that provides emergency clinicians with evidence-based updates concerning sepsis and septic shock. This first paper focuses on evaluation and diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The evaluation, diagnosis, and management of sepsis have evolved since the first definition in 1991. Current guidelines emphasize rapid diagnosis to improve patient outcomes. However, scoring systems have conflicting data for diagnosis, and sepsis should be considered in any patient with infection and abnormal vital signs, evidence of systemic inflammation (e.g., elevated white blood cell count or C-reactive protein), or evidence of end-organ dysfunction. The clinician should consider septic shock in any patient with infection and hypotension despite volume resuscitation or who require vasopressors to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg. There are a variety of sources of sepsis but the most common include pulmonary, urinary tract, abdomen, and skin/soft tissue. Examples of other less common etiologies include the central nervous system (e.g., meningitis, encephalitis), spine (e.g., spinal epidural abscess, osteomyelitis), cardiac (e.g., endocarditis), and joints (e.g., septic arthritis). Evaluation may include biomarkers such as procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and lactate, but these should not be used in isolation to exclude sepsis. Imaging is a key component of evaluation and should be based on the suspected source.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There have been several recent updates in the literature including guidelines concerning sepsis and septic shock; an understanding of these updates can assist emergency clinicians and improve the care of these patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"90 ","pages":"Pages 169-178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675725000646","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Sepsis and septic shock are common conditions evaluated and managed in the emergency department (ED), and these conditions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There have been several recent updates in the literature, including guidelines, on the evaluation and diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock.

Objective

This is the first paper in a two-part series that provides emergency clinicians with evidence-based updates concerning sepsis and septic shock. This first paper focuses on evaluation and diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock.

Discussion

The evaluation, diagnosis, and management of sepsis have evolved since the first definition in 1991. Current guidelines emphasize rapid diagnosis to improve patient outcomes. However, scoring systems have conflicting data for diagnosis, and sepsis should be considered in any patient with infection and abnormal vital signs, evidence of systemic inflammation (e.g., elevated white blood cell count or C-reactive protein), or evidence of end-organ dysfunction. The clinician should consider septic shock in any patient with infection and hypotension despite volume resuscitation or who require vasopressors to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥ 65 mmHg. There are a variety of sources of sepsis but the most common include pulmonary, urinary tract, abdomen, and skin/soft tissue. Examples of other less common etiologies include the central nervous system (e.g., meningitis, encephalitis), spine (e.g., spinal epidural abscess, osteomyelitis), cardiac (e.g., endocarditis), and joints (e.g., septic arthritis). Evaluation may include biomarkers such as procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, and lactate, but these should not be used in isolation to exclude sepsis. Imaging is a key component of evaluation and should be based on the suspected source.

Conclusion

There have been several recent updates in the literature including guidelines concerning sepsis and septic shock; an understanding of these updates can assist emergency clinicians and improve the care of these patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊医学更新:脓毒症和感染性休克的评估和诊断。
简介:败血症和感染性休克是急诊评估和处理的常见疾病,这些疾病与显著的发病率和死亡率相关。最近有一些文献更新,包括指南,对脓毒症和感染性休克的评估和诊断。目的:这是两部分系列的第一篇论文,为急诊临床医生提供有关败血症和感染性休克的循证更新。本文首先就脓毒症和感染性休克的评估和诊断进行综述。讨论:自1991年首次定义脓毒症以来,脓毒症的评估、诊断和治疗已经发生了变化。目前的指南强调快速诊断以改善患者预后。然而,评分系统的诊断数据相互矛盾,在任何有感染和生命体征异常、全身性炎症证据(如白细胞计数或c反应蛋白升高)或终末器官功能障碍证据的患者中,都应考虑败血症。临床医生应考虑感染性休克的任何患者感染和低血压,尽管容积复苏或需要血管加压维持平均动脉压≥65 mmHg。脓毒症有多种来源,但最常见的包括肺部、泌尿道、腹部和皮肤/软组织。其他不太常见的病因包括中枢神经系统(如脑膜炎、脑炎)、脊柱(如脊髓硬膜外脓肿、骨髓炎)、心脏(如心内膜炎)和关节(如感染性关节炎)。评估可包括生物标志物,如降钙素原、c反应蛋白和乳酸,但这些不应单独用于排除败血症。成像是评估的关键组成部分,应该基于可疑的来源。结论:最近有一些文献更新,包括脓毒症和脓毒性休克的指南;了解这些更新可以帮助急诊临床医生并改善对这些患者的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Serum myoglobin burden in disaster-related crush syndrome following the 2023 Türkiye earthquakes. Positive serial blood cultures after negative initial cultures in the ED for patients with sepsis. Practice changing articles: Efficacy of albuterol-budesonide inhaler compared with albuterol alone in mild asthma. Large academic enterprise load balancing: ED patient transfers to regional hospitals. Mixed reality simulation outperforms video for peripheral venous catheter placement training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1