Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - prognostic factors and prognostic models: A systematic review

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101921
Inge E.P.M. van Haren , Maarten P. van der Worp , Rogier van Rijn , Janine H. Stubbe , Robert E.H. van Cingel , André L.M. Verbeek , Philip J. van der Wees , J. Bart Staal
{"title":"Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - prognostic factors and prognostic models: A systematic review","authors":"Inge E.P.M. van Haren ,&nbsp;Maarten P. van der Worp ,&nbsp;Rogier van Rijn ,&nbsp;Janine H. Stubbe ,&nbsp;Robert E.H. van Cingel ,&nbsp;André L.M. Verbeek ,&nbsp;Philip J. van der Wees ,&nbsp;J. Bart Staal","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>A variety of criteria are used to make return to sport decisions after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review summarized and evaluated prognostic factors and clinical prognostic models for returning to sports after ACL reconstruction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Independent pairs of reviewers assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias and certainty of evidence. A systematic literature search was conducted in key electronic databases. Inclusion criteria: studies published in English, longitudinal cohort or case-control design, reporting outcomes on return to sport or Tegner Activity Score (TAS), participants aged ≥16 years undergoing primary ACL reconstruction, and defined as athletes/sport players or having a pre-injury TAS ≥5. Only associations between predictors and outcomes that were analyzed in ≥3 studies and had consistent results in the same direction in ≥75 % of the studies were considered and reported. Risk of bias was evaluated using the QUIPS or PROBAST tools, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>37 studies (5 low, 6 moderate, and 26 high risk of bias) on prognostic factors and 1 study on prognostic models (low risk of bias), representing 6278 participants, were included. Six prognostic factors were identified and rated as very low certainty evidence: fewer concomitant meniscal injuries, shorter time between injury and surgery, higher jump test scores, better physical functioning, higher muscle strength, and greater psychological readiness to return to sport. Two prognostic models with AUC 0.77–0.78 and 70 % accuracy for predicting return to sport were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a very low certainty of evidence that returning to sport is associated with both physical, psychological and demographic prognostic factors. More methodologically sound research on prognostic factors and prognostic models for return to sport in athletes after ACL reconstruction is needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"68 3","pages":"Article 101921"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065724001040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

A variety of criteria are used to make return to sport decisions after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Objectives

This systematic review summarized and evaluated prognostic factors and clinical prognostic models for returning to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Methods

Independent pairs of reviewers assessed eligibility, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias and certainty of evidence. A systematic literature search was conducted in key electronic databases. Inclusion criteria: studies published in English, longitudinal cohort or case-control design, reporting outcomes on return to sport or Tegner Activity Score (TAS), participants aged ≥16 years undergoing primary ACL reconstruction, and defined as athletes/sport players or having a pre-injury TAS ≥5. Only associations between predictors and outcomes that were analyzed in ≥3 studies and had consistent results in the same direction in ≥75 % of the studies were considered and reported. Risk of bias was evaluated using the QUIPS or PROBAST tools, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE framework.

Results

37 studies (5 low, 6 moderate, and 26 high risk of bias) on prognostic factors and 1 study on prognostic models (low risk of bias), representing 6278 participants, were included. Six prognostic factors were identified and rated as very low certainty evidence: fewer concomitant meniscal injuries, shorter time between injury and surgery, higher jump test scores, better physical functioning, higher muscle strength, and greater psychological readiness to return to sport. Two prognostic models with AUC 0.77–0.78 and 70 % accuracy for predicting return to sport were identified.

Conclusion

There is a very low certainty of evidence that returning to sport is associated with both physical, psychological and demographic prognostic factors. More methodologically sound research on prognostic factors and prognostic models for return to sport in athletes after ACL reconstruction is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive remediation combined with brain stimulation after acquired brain injury: A single-case experimental design with 15 individuals Efficacy and safety of intra-articular botulinum toxin injection therapy for joint pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis Quality of instruments measuring activity and participation in children with developmental coordination disorder: A systematic review Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score trajectories and prognostic factors for functional decline: A 3-year follow-up study Prevalence of distance walking fatigability in multiple sclerosis according to MS phenotype, disability severity and walking speed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1