Perspectives from parents and clinicians on an ecology-focused approach to a group well-child care.

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC primary care Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1186/s12875-025-02718-z
Ishaan T Shah, Nina D Ham, Hassan Lubega, Christopher L Boswell, Esther Kim Liu, Renée D Boynton-Jarrett
{"title":"Perspectives from parents and clinicians on an ecology-focused approach to a group well-child care.","authors":"Ishaan T Shah, Nina D Ham, Hassan Lubega, Christopher L Boswell, Esther Kim Liu, Renée D Boynton-Jarrett","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02718-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Group well-child care (GWCC) is a novel group-based alternative for pediatric primary care visits that may allow for adaptations that better tailor to the needs of underserved populations. This qualitative study investigates clinician and parent perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of integrating ecology-focused content in GWCC using semi-structured interviews with GWCC parent-graduates and ecology-focused child clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ecology-focused child clinicians were purposively sampled via email outreach. GWCC parent graduates were recruited via announcement in private Facebook groups. One-on-one interviews were conducted via videoconference, transcribed, and analyzed using an inductive approach. Parent and clinician thematic analyses were independently conducted to construct shared domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine GWCC parent-graduates and nine ecology-focused child clinicians were recruited into the study. Four overarching themes were constructed across parent and clinician responses: questions about clinical appropriateness, parent and clinician desires for educational support, influences of perceptions of nature on clinicians, and parent desires to develop independence and autonomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified nuanced considerations from the perspective of parents and clinicians for the implementation of ecology-focused content in the GWCC setting. Understanding the range of preferences parents and clinicians may have over ecology-focused content can help GWCC clinicians in designing ecology-focused preventive counseling materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786538/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02718-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Group well-child care (GWCC) is a novel group-based alternative for pediatric primary care visits that may allow for adaptations that better tailor to the needs of underserved populations. This qualitative study investigates clinician and parent perspectives on the acceptability and feasibility of integrating ecology-focused content in GWCC using semi-structured interviews with GWCC parent-graduates and ecology-focused child clinicians.

Methods: Ecology-focused child clinicians were purposively sampled via email outreach. GWCC parent graduates were recruited via announcement in private Facebook groups. One-on-one interviews were conducted via videoconference, transcribed, and analyzed using an inductive approach. Parent and clinician thematic analyses were independently conducted to construct shared domains.

Results: Nine GWCC parent-graduates and nine ecology-focused child clinicians were recruited into the study. Four overarching themes were constructed across parent and clinician responses: questions about clinical appropriateness, parent and clinician desires for educational support, influences of perceptions of nature on clinicians, and parent desires to develop independence and autonomy.

Conclusion: This study identified nuanced considerations from the perspective of parents and clinicians for the implementation of ecology-focused content in the GWCC setting. Understanding the range of preferences parents and clinicians may have over ecology-focused content can help GWCC clinicians in designing ecology-focused preventive counseling materials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从家长和临床医生的观点对生态为重点的方法,以一个群体良好的儿童护理。
背景:儿童群体健康照护(GWCC)是一种新颖的以群体为基础的儿科初级保健就诊替代方案,可以更好地适应服务不足人群的需求。本定性研究通过对GWCC家长毕业生和以生态为中心的儿童临床医生的半结构化访谈,调查了临床医生和家长对将生态为中心的内容纳入GWCC的可接受性和可行性的看法。方法:通过电子邮件外展有目的地对以生态学为重点的儿童临床医生进行抽样调查。GWCC的家长毕业生是通过在Facebook的私人群组中发布公告来招募的。一对一的访谈通过视频会议进行,并使用归纳方法进行转录和分析。家长和临床医生的专题分析独立进行,以构建共享域。结果:9名GWCC家长毕业生和9名关注生态的儿童临床医生被招募到研究中。在父母和临床医生的回答中构建了四个总体主题:关于临床适宜性的问题,父母和临床医生对教育支持的愿望,对自然的看法对临床医生的影响,以及父母对发展独立和自主的愿望。结论:本研究从家长和临床医生的角度确定了在GWCC环境中实施以生态为重点的内容的细微考虑。了解家长和临床医生对以生态为重点的内容的偏好范围可以帮助GWCC临床医生设计以生态为重点的预防咨询材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work preferences and motivations of young general practitioners in Switzerland: findings from a cross-sectional survey of the Swiss Young General Practitioners Association (JHaS). Clinical and cost effectiveness of nurse led-structured management of diarrhoea predominant irritable bowel syndrome in primary care (Lincolnshire POACHER study); a randomised control trial. Association of serum albumin level, feeding route, and mobility status with pressure ulcer presence in bedridden adults receiving long-term care. What do patients and clinicians think about interventions which prioritise continuity for certain patients in primary care? Evaluating the participatory processes within the OECD PaRIS project in Saskatchewan: lessons learned about recruitment and engagement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1