Virtual avoidance: Examining STEM students' lower interest in online courses

IF 6.8 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Internet and Higher Education Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100995
Miranda M. McIntyre , Geoffrey Cui , Yunfei Hou
{"title":"Virtual avoidance: Examining STEM students' lower interest in online courses","authors":"Miranda M. McIntyre ,&nbsp;Geoffrey Cui ,&nbsp;Yunfei Hou","doi":"10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Online education is growing in popularity, yet online courses in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) experience lower student satisfaction and higher attrition compared to non-STEM courses. This study explores differences in online course perceptions between STEM and non-STEM students and how these perceptions influence their intentions to enroll in future online courses. A sample of 1245 students was recruited from a diverse range of majors, with 44 % of students majoring in STEM. Relative to non-STEM majors, STEM students felt that online classes offer lower performance outcomes, are less enjoyable, and offer less flexibility while requiring more effort. These perceptions explain 74 % of the variance in intentions to enroll in online courses. Differences among STEM sub-categories were also examined to provide a nuanced picture of students' experiences in online courses. The findings identify strategic improvements for online STEM courses by targeting learning-based performance, flexibility in course modality, and students' enjoyment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48186,"journal":{"name":"Internet and Higher Education","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 100995"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096751625000041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online education is growing in popularity, yet online courses in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) experience lower student satisfaction and higher attrition compared to non-STEM courses. This study explores differences in online course perceptions between STEM and non-STEM students and how these perceptions influence their intentions to enroll in future online courses. A sample of 1245 students was recruited from a diverse range of majors, with 44 % of students majoring in STEM. Relative to non-STEM majors, STEM students felt that online classes offer lower performance outcomes, are less enjoyable, and offer less flexibility while requiring more effort. These perceptions explain 74 % of the variance in intentions to enroll in online courses. Differences among STEM sub-categories were also examined to provide a nuanced picture of students' experiences in online courses. The findings identify strategic improvements for online STEM courses by targeting learning-based performance, flexibility in course modality, and students' enjoyment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚拟回避:研究STEM学生对在线课程的低兴趣
在线教育越来越受欢迎,然而与非STEM课程相比,科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)的在线课程的学生满意度较低,流失率较高。本研究探讨了STEM和非STEM学生对在线课程的看法差异,以及这些看法如何影响他们未来参加在线课程的意愿。1245名学生来自不同的专业,其中44%的学生主修STEM。与非STEM专业的学生相比,STEM专业的学生认为在线课程的表现较差,不太愉快,灵活性较差,但需要更多的努力。这些观点解释了报名参加在线课程意愿差异的74%。还研究了STEM子类别之间的差异,以提供学生在线课程体验的细微图景。研究结果确定了在线STEM课程的战略改进,目标是基于学习的表现、课程模式的灵活性和学生的享受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Internet and Higher Education
Internet and Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
19.30
自引率
4.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The Internet and Higher Education is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal focused on contemporary issues and future trends in online learning, teaching, and administration within post-secondary education. It welcomes contributions from diverse academic disciplines worldwide and provides a platform for theory papers, research studies, critical essays, editorials, reviews, case studies, and social commentary.
期刊最新文献
Effects of stem activities in virtual reality environments on preservice teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge and technology acceptance Mapping the structure of student burnout in online learning: An integrated Gaussian model and directed acyclic graph approach Emotional artificial intelligence in higher education: A systematic review Human-AI collaboration or obedient and often clueless AI in instruct, serve, repeat dynamics? Matching the moderator role with task level in asynchronous online discussions: Insights from a randomized experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1