Liquid Medication Dosing Errors: Comparison of a Ready-to-Use Vigabatrin Solution to Reconstituted Solutions of Vigabatrin Powder for Oral Solution

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Advances in Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1007/s12325-024-03089-0
Raenel Gibson, Ron Klima, Jay Van Horn
{"title":"Liquid Medication Dosing Errors: Comparison of a Ready-to-Use Vigabatrin Solution to Reconstituted Solutions of Vigabatrin Powder for Oral Solution","authors":"Raenel Gibson,&nbsp;Ron Klima,&nbsp;Jay Van Horn","doi":"10.1007/s12325-024-03089-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Vigabatrin (VGB) is intended for use by caregivers of infants (1 month to 2 years old) diagnosed with infantile spasms (IS). Commercially available vigabatrin powders require caregiver reconstitution prior to oral administration. This study compared the ability of caregivers to accurately provide a targeted dose of vigabatrin using a ready-to-use (RTU) vigabatrin oral solution (VGB-RTU solution) and SABRIL<sup>®</sup> (vigabatrin) powder for oral solution, Lundbeck LLC, (vigabatrin powder) without instruction from a healthcare professional.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>A crossover comparative usability study with 30 lay users (15 caregivers with vigabatrin powder experience and 15 oral-syringe/medication preparation naïve users) which required users to deliver a single dose of both VGB-RTU surrogate solution and vigabatrin powder to a sample collection bottle was performed. Doses were measured analytically with a primary endpoint to deliver doses within ± 10% of the target dose of 1125 mg.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>All 30 participants administered VGB-RTU solution doses within ± 5% of the target, while only 23/30 of the vigabatrin powder doses were within ± 10%. All naïve users delivered vigabatrin doses using VGB-RTU solution within ± 5% of the target; whereas only 13/15 delivered doses within ± 10% for vigabatrin powder. All experienced vigabatrin users delivered calculated vigabatrin doses using VGB-RTU solution within ± 3%; whereas only 10/15 delivered doses within ± 10% for vigabatrin powder. Users were equally able to accurately deliver the prescribed volumes of both products. Calculated doses of VGB-RTU solution (mg) were significantly less variable (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001) and more accurate (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) than doses of vigabatrin powder.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Caregivers delivered more accurate and less variable doses of the ready-to-use solution compared to solutions prepared from vigabatrin powders for oral solution. These differences were shown to be due to caregiver errors in reconstituting vigabatrin powders for oral solution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7482,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Therapy","volume":"42 3","pages":"1484 - 1493"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12325-024-03089-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12325-024-03089-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Vigabatrin (VGB) is intended for use by caregivers of infants (1 month to 2 years old) diagnosed with infantile spasms (IS). Commercially available vigabatrin powders require caregiver reconstitution prior to oral administration. This study compared the ability of caregivers to accurately provide a targeted dose of vigabatrin using a ready-to-use (RTU) vigabatrin oral solution (VGB-RTU solution) and SABRIL® (vigabatrin) powder for oral solution, Lundbeck LLC, (vigabatrin powder) without instruction from a healthcare professional.

Methods

A crossover comparative usability study with 30 lay users (15 caregivers with vigabatrin powder experience and 15 oral-syringe/medication preparation naïve users) which required users to deliver a single dose of both VGB-RTU surrogate solution and vigabatrin powder to a sample collection bottle was performed. Doses were measured analytically with a primary endpoint to deliver doses within ± 10% of the target dose of 1125 mg.

Results

All 30 participants administered VGB-RTU solution doses within ± 5% of the target, while only 23/30 of the vigabatrin powder doses were within ± 10%. All naïve users delivered vigabatrin doses using VGB-RTU solution within ± 5% of the target; whereas only 13/15 delivered doses within ± 10% for vigabatrin powder. All experienced vigabatrin users delivered calculated vigabatrin doses using VGB-RTU solution within ± 3%; whereas only 10/15 delivered doses within ± 10% for vigabatrin powder. Users were equally able to accurately deliver the prescribed volumes of both products. Calculated doses of VGB-RTU solution (mg) were significantly less variable (p < 0.0001) and more accurate (p < 0.01) than doses of vigabatrin powder.

Conclusion

Caregivers delivered more accurate and less variable doses of the ready-to-use solution compared to solutions prepared from vigabatrin powders for oral solution. These differences were shown to be due to caregiver errors in reconstituting vigabatrin powders for oral solution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液体药物剂量错误:口服维加巴林粉末与维加巴林即用溶液的比较。
Vigabatrin (VGB)适用于诊断为婴儿痉挛(is)的婴儿(1个月至2岁)的护理人员。市售维加巴特林粉剂需要护理人员在口服给药前进行重组。本研究比较了护理人员在没有医疗保健专业人员指导的情况下,使用即食(RTU)维加巴林口服溶液(VGB-RTU溶液)和SABRIL®(维加巴林)口服溶液(维加巴林粉末)准确提供目标剂量的能力。方法:对30名非专业用户(15名具有维加巴林粉经验的护理人员和15名口服注射器/药物制剂naïve用户)进行交叉比较可用性研究,要求用户将单剂量的VGB-RTU替代溶液和维加巴林粉分别输送到样品收集瓶中。剂量以主要终点进行分析测量,以在1125mg目标剂量的±10%内提供剂量。结果:所有30名参与者给予的VGB-RTU溶液剂量在目标的±5%范围内,而只有23/30的维加巴特林粉剂量在目标的±10%范围内。所有naïve使用者使用VGB-RTU溶液在目标的±5%范围内给予维加巴林剂量;而维加巴特林粉剂只有13/15的剂量在±10%以内。所有有经验的维加巴特林使用者使用VGB-RTU溶液在±3%范围内提供计算的维加巴特林剂量;而维加巴特林粉剂只有10/15的剂量在±10%以内。用户同样能够准确地交付两种产品的规定量。VGB-RTU溶液的计算剂量(mg)变化明显较小(p)。结论:护理人员提供的即食溶液剂量比口服维加巴林粉末制备的溶液更准确,变化更小。这些差异被证明是由于护理人员在重新配制维加巴特林口服液粉末时的错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Therapy
Advances in Therapy 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.60%
发文量
353
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all therapeutic areas. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Advances in Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
The Critical Role of Oxygen Supplementation in Epithelium-On Corneal Cross-Linking: A Narrative Review. Overcoming Hyperkalaemia as a Barrier to Achieving Optimal RAASi Therapy and Cardiorenal Protection in Individuals with Cardiorenal Disease: A Podcast Discussion. Cognitive Decline and Illness Progression in Bipolar Disorder. Impact of Home-Based Respiratory Physiotherapy in Nusinersen-Treated Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Joint Assessment Matters: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Benefits of Interdisciplinary Psoriasis Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1