Area socioeconomic inequality and suicide mortality: contrasting common measures using National Violent Death Reporting System and linked administrative data.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of epidemiology Pub Date : 2025-12-02 DOI:10.1093/aje/kwaf021
Viktoryia A Kalesnikava, Eskira Kahsay, Chuwen Zhong, Emma Spring, Courtney Bagge, Sarah Burgard, Briana Mezuk, Philippa J Clarke
{"title":"Area socioeconomic inequality and suicide mortality: contrasting common measures using National Violent Death Reporting System and linked administrative data.","authors":"Viktoryia A Kalesnikava, Eskira Kahsay, Chuwen Zhong, Emma Spring, Courtney Bagge, Sarah Burgard, Briana Mezuk, Philippa J Clarke","doi":"10.1093/aje/kwaf021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Area economic inequality may underlie social disparities in suicide mortality (SM). Differences in measuring inequality contribute to variability across empirical evidence. We contrasted common income measures-absolute poverty, Gini inequality index, Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE)-and examined their associations with age- and sex-standardized SM across 1381 US counties. We used the 2006-2019 National Violent Death Reporting System linked to 2006-2010 administrative data on socioeconomic factors and a Bayesian spatial multilevel approach. Compared to affluent areas, poorer areas had the highest relative risk (RR) of SM (ICE RR, 1.24; 95% credible interval [CI], 1.17-1.31; absolute poverty RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.25-1.41). Gini inequality was not linearly associated with SM. Cross-classifying Gini × ICE showed that the highest-risk areas had concentrated poverty (ICE) but varying Gini inequality. These high-risk, poverty-segregated areas were more often medically underserved, had lower population density, and high unemployment. African American or Indigenous suicide decedents frequently resided in high inequality areas, while older, White decedents with military backgrounds more often resided in lower Gini areas. The choice of inequality measure can lead to varied conclusions about social disparities in SM. A comparative approach offers more nuanced understanding of underlying socioeconomic marginalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7472,"journal":{"name":"American journal of epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"3472-3482"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaf021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Area economic inequality may underlie social disparities in suicide mortality (SM). Differences in measuring inequality contribute to variability across empirical evidence. We contrasted common income measures-absolute poverty, Gini inequality index, Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE)-and examined their associations with age- and sex-standardized SM across 1381 US counties. We used the 2006-2019 National Violent Death Reporting System linked to 2006-2010 administrative data on socioeconomic factors and a Bayesian spatial multilevel approach. Compared to affluent areas, poorer areas had the highest relative risk (RR) of SM (ICE RR, 1.24; 95% credible interval [CI], 1.17-1.31; absolute poverty RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.25-1.41). Gini inequality was not linearly associated with SM. Cross-classifying Gini × ICE showed that the highest-risk areas had concentrated poverty (ICE) but varying Gini inequality. These high-risk, poverty-segregated areas were more often medically underserved, had lower population density, and high unemployment. African American or Indigenous suicide decedents frequently resided in high inequality areas, while older, White decedents with military backgrounds more often resided in lower Gini areas. The choice of inequality measure can lead to varied conclusions about social disparities in SM. A comparative approach offers more nuanced understanding of underlying socioeconomic marginalization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地区社会经济不平等和自杀死亡率:使用国家暴力死亡报告系统和相关行政数据对比常用措施。
地区经济不平等可能是自杀死亡率(SM)的社会差异的基础。衡量不平等的差异导致了经验证据的差异。我们对比了常见的收入指标——绝对贫困、基尼不平等指数、极端集中指数(ICE)——并研究了它们与美国1381个县的年龄和性别标准化SM之间的关系。我们使用了2006-2019年国家暴力死亡报告系统,该系统与2006-2010年社会经济因素的行政数据和贝叶斯空间多层次方法相关联。与富裕地区相比,贫困地区SM的相对危险度最高(ICE RR: 1.24, 95%可信区间(CI): 1.17 ~ 1.31,绝对贫困RR: 1.33, CI: 1.25 ~ 1.41)。基尼不平等与SM不呈线性相关。交叉分类基尼系数x ICE显示,风险最高的地区有集中的贫困(ICE),但基尼不平等程度不同。这些高风险的贫困隔离地区往往医疗服务不足,人口密度低,失业率高。非裔美国人或土著自杀者通常居住在基尼系数高的地区,而年龄较大、有军事背景的白人自杀者则更多地居住在基尼系数低的地区。不平等测量的选择可以导致关于SM社会差异的不同结论。比较方法对潜在的社会经济边缘化提供了更细致入微的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of epidemiology
American journal of epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
221
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Epidemiology is the oldest and one of the premier epidemiologic journals devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, opinion pieces, and methodological developments in the field of epidemiologic research. It is a peer-reviewed journal aimed at both fellow epidemiologists and those who use epidemiologic data, including public health workers and clinicians.
期刊最新文献
Prepregnancy body mass index, pregnancy weight gain, and postpartum weight retention in Pennsylvania 2003 to 2020: an age-period-cohort analysis. Neighborhood-level socioeconomic position and mortality among children born with critical congenital heart defects. Validating clinical assumptions for characterizing prostate cancer aggressiveness utilizing historical cancer registry data. Clarifying Causal Questions in Population Health Research: Anatomy of a Causal Estimand. New to Cohort, Not New to Care: Leveraging Historical Data in HIV Clinical Cohorts in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1