Casual associations between frailty and nine mental disorders: bidirectional Mendelian randomisation study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY BJPsych Open Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1192/bjo.2024.835
Yong Zhou, Jiayue Duan, Jiayi Zhu, Yunying Huang, Tao Tu, Keke Wu, Qiuzhen Lin, Yingxu Ma, Qiming Liu
{"title":"Casual associations between frailty and nine mental disorders: bidirectional Mendelian randomisation study.","authors":"Yong Zhou, Jiayue Duan, Jiayi Zhu, Yunying Huang, Tao Tu, Keke Wu, Qiuzhen Lin, Yingxu Ma, Qiming Liu","doi":"10.1192/bjo.2024.835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increasing number of observational studies have reported associations between frailty and mental disorders, but the causality remains ambiguous.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the bidirectional causal relationship between frailty and nine mental disorders.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomisation on genome-wide association study summary data, to investigate causality between frailty and nine mental disorders. Causal effects were primarily estimated using inverse variance weighted method. Several secondary analyses were applied to verify the results. Cochran's <i>Q</i>-test and Mendelian randomisation Egger intercept were applied to evaluate heterogeneity and pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genetically determined frailty was significantly associated with increased risk of major depressive disorder (MDD) (odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.36-2.53, <i>P</i> = 8.1 × 10<sup>-5</sup>), anxiety (odds ratio 2.76, 95% CI 1.56-4.90, <i>P</i> = 5.0 × 10<sup>-4</sup>), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (odds ratio 2.56, 95% CI 1.69-3.87, <i>P</i> = 9.9 × 10<sup>-6</sup>), neuroticism (<i>β</i> = 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.38, <i>P</i> = 3.3 × 10<sup>-4</sup>) and insomnia (<i>β</i> = 0.50, 95% CI 0.25-0.75, <i>P</i> = 1.1 × 10<sup>-4</sup>). Conversely, genetic liability to MDD, neuroticism, insomnia and suicide attempt significantly increased risk of frailty (MDD: <i>β</i> = 0.071, 95% CI 0.033-0.110, <i>P</i> = 2.8 × 10<sup>-4</sup>; neuroticism: <i>β</i> = 0.269, 95% CI 0.173-0.365, <i>P</i> = 3.4 × 10<sup>-8</sup>; insomnia: <i>β</i> = 0.160, 95% CI 0.141-0.179, <i>P</i> = 3.2 × 10<sup>-61</sup>; suicide attempt: <i>β</i> = 0.056, 95% CI 0.029-0.084, <i>P</i> = 3.4 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). There was a suggestive detrimental association of frailty on suicide attempt and an inverse relationship of subjective well-being on frailty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings show bidirectional causal associations between frailty and MDD, insomnia and neuroticism. Additionally, higher frailty levels are associated with anxiety and PTSD, and suicide attempts are correlated with increased frailty. Understanding these associations is crucial for the effective management of frailty and improvement of mental disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":9038,"journal":{"name":"BJPsych Open","volume":"11 2","pages":"e28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJPsych Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2024.835","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An increasing number of observational studies have reported associations between frailty and mental disorders, but the causality remains ambiguous.

Aims: To assess the bidirectional causal relationship between frailty and nine mental disorders.

Method: We conducted a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomisation on genome-wide association study summary data, to investigate causality between frailty and nine mental disorders. Causal effects were primarily estimated using inverse variance weighted method. Several secondary analyses were applied to verify the results. Cochran's Q-test and Mendelian randomisation Egger intercept were applied to evaluate heterogeneity and pleiotropy.

Results: Genetically determined frailty was significantly associated with increased risk of major depressive disorder (MDD) (odds ratio 1.86, 95% CI 1.36-2.53, P = 8.1 × 10-5), anxiety (odds ratio 2.76, 95% CI 1.56-4.90, P = 5.0 × 10-4), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (odds ratio 2.56, 95% CI 1.69-3.87, P = 9.9 × 10-6), neuroticism (β = 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.38, P = 3.3 × 10-4) and insomnia (β = 0.50, 95% CI 0.25-0.75, P = 1.1 × 10-4). Conversely, genetic liability to MDD, neuroticism, insomnia and suicide attempt significantly increased risk of frailty (MDD: β = 0.071, 95% CI 0.033-0.110, P = 2.8 × 10-4; neuroticism: β = 0.269, 95% CI 0.173-0.365, P = 3.4 × 10-8; insomnia: β = 0.160, 95% CI 0.141-0.179, P = 3.2 × 10-61; suicide attempt: β = 0.056, 95% CI 0.029-0.084, P = 3.4 × 10-5). There was a suggestive detrimental association of frailty on suicide attempt and an inverse relationship of subjective well-being on frailty.

Conclusions: Our findings show bidirectional causal associations between frailty and MDD, insomnia and neuroticism. Additionally, higher frailty levels are associated with anxiety and PTSD, and suicide attempts are correlated with increased frailty. Understanding these associations is crucial for the effective management of frailty and improvement of mental disorders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
虚弱和九种精神障碍之间的偶然联系:双向孟德尔随机研究。
背景:越来越多的观察性研究报道了虚弱和精神障碍之间的联系,但因果关系仍然不明确。目的:探讨虚弱与九种精神障碍之间的双向因果关系。方法:对全基因组关联研究汇总数据进行双向双样本孟德尔随机化,探讨虚弱与9种精神障碍之间的因果关系。因果效应的估计主要采用方差反加权法。应用了几次分析来验证结果。采用科克伦q检验和孟德尔随机化Egger截距评价异质性和多效性。结果:基因决定的脆弱与重度抑郁症(MDD)(优势比1.86,95% CI 1.36-2.53, P = 8.1 × 10-5)、焦虑(优势比2.76,95% CI 1.56-4.90, P = 5.0 × 10-4)、创伤后应激障碍(创伤后应激障碍)(优势比2.56,95% CI 1.69-3.87, P = 9.9 × 10-6)、神经质(β = 0.25, 95% CI 0.11-0.38, P = 3.3 × 10-4)和失眠(β = 0.50, 95% CI 0.25-0.75, P = 1.1 × 10-4)的风险增加显著相关。相反,MDD、神经质、失眠和自杀倾向的遗传倾向显著增加了虚弱的风险(MDD: β = 0.071, 95% CI 0.033-0.110, P = 2.8 × 10-4;神经质:β = 0.269, 95% CI 0.173 ~ 0.365, P = 3.4 × 10-8;失眠:β = 0.160, 95% CI 0.141 ~ 0.179, P = 3.2 × 10-61;自杀企图:β = 0.056, 95% CI 0.029-0.084, P = 3.4 × 10-5)。脆弱与自杀企图之间存在暗示性的有害关联,主观幸福感与脆弱之间存在反比关系。结论:我们的发现显示了虚弱和重度抑郁症、失眠和神经质之间的双向因果关系。此外,更脆弱的程度与焦虑和创伤后应激障碍有关,自杀企图与更脆弱有关。了解这些关联对于有效管理虚弱和改善精神障碍至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJPsych Open
BJPsych Open Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
610
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Announcing the launch of BJPsych Open, an exciting new open access online journal for the publication of all methodologically sound research in all fields of psychiatry and disciplines related to mental health. BJPsych Open will maintain the highest scientific, peer review, and ethical standards of the BJPsych, ensure rapid publication for authors whilst sharing research with no cost to the reader in the spirit of maximising dissemination and public engagement. Cascade submission from BJPsych to BJPsych Open is a new option for authors whose first priority is rapid online publication with the prestigious BJPsych brand. Authors will also retain copyright to their works under a creative commons license.
期刊最新文献
Predictors of high- and low-risk drinking after group treatment for alcohol use disorder - CORRIGENDUM. The effect of calendar month on tic severity in children and youth with Tourette syndrome. The treatment experiences of women with perinatal OCD on Mother and Baby Units: qualitative investigation of the perspectives of women and professionals. Moderating effect of avoidance on the relationship between depression and suicidal ideation across different types of trauma exposure. Trends in mental health referrals before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective population-based service evaluation in a single NHS trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1