A machine learning-based radiomics approach for differentiating patellofemoral osteoarthritis from non-patellofemoral osteoarthritis using Q-Dixon MRI.

IF 2.6 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2025.1535519
Liangjing Lyu, Jing Ren, Wenjie Lu, Jingyu Zhong, Yang Song, Yongliang Li, Weiwu Yao
{"title":"A machine learning-based radiomics approach for differentiating patellofemoral osteoarthritis from non-patellofemoral osteoarthritis using Q-Dixon MRI.","authors":"Liangjing Lyu, Jing Ren, Wenjie Lu, Jingyu Zhong, Yang Song, Yongliang Li, Weiwu Yao","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2025.1535519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This prospective diagnostic study aimed to assess the utility of machine learning-based quadriceps fat pad (QFP) radiomics in distinguishing patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) from non-PFOA using Q-Dixon MRI in patients presenting with anterior knee pain. This diagnostic accuracy study retrospectively analyzed data from 215 patients (mean age: 54.2 ± 11.3 years; 113 women). Three predictive models were evaluated: a proton density-weighted image model, a fat fraction model, and a merged model. Feature selection was conducted using analysis of variance, and logistic regression was applied for classification. Data were collected from training, internal, and external test cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from Q-Dixon MRI sequences to distinguish PFOA from non-PFOA. The diagnostic performance of the three models was compared using the area under the curve (AUC) values analyzed with the Delong test. In the training set (109 patients) and internal test set (73 patients), the merged model exhibited optimal performance, with AUCs of 0.836 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.762-0.910] and 0.826 (95% CI: 0.722-0.929), respectively. In the external test set (33 patients), the model achieved an AUC of 0.885 (95% CI: 0.768-1.000), with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.833 and 0.933, respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Fat fraction features exhibited a stronger predictive value than shape-related features. Machine learning-based QFP radiomics using Q-Dixon MRI accurately distinguishes PFOA from non-PFOA, providing a non-invasive diagnostic approach for patients with anterior knee pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"7 ","pages":"1535519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782249/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2025.1535519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This prospective diagnostic study aimed to assess the utility of machine learning-based quadriceps fat pad (QFP) radiomics in distinguishing patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA) from non-PFOA using Q-Dixon MRI in patients presenting with anterior knee pain. This diagnostic accuracy study retrospectively analyzed data from 215 patients (mean age: 54.2 ± 11.3 years; 113 women). Three predictive models were evaluated: a proton density-weighted image model, a fat fraction model, and a merged model. Feature selection was conducted using analysis of variance, and logistic regression was applied for classification. Data were collected from training, internal, and external test cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from Q-Dixon MRI sequences to distinguish PFOA from non-PFOA. The diagnostic performance of the three models was compared using the area under the curve (AUC) values analyzed with the Delong test. In the training set (109 patients) and internal test set (73 patients), the merged model exhibited optimal performance, with AUCs of 0.836 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.762-0.910] and 0.826 (95% CI: 0.722-0.929), respectively. In the external test set (33 patients), the model achieved an AUC of 0.885 (95% CI: 0.768-1.000), with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.833 and 0.933, respectively (p < 0.001). Fat fraction features exhibited a stronger predictive value than shape-related features. Machine learning-based QFP radiomics using Q-Dixon MRI accurately distinguishes PFOA from non-PFOA, providing a non-invasive diagnostic approach for patients with anterior knee pain.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的放射组学方法鉴别髌骨骨关节炎与非髌骨骨关节炎使用Q-Dixon MRI。
这项前瞻性诊断研究旨在评估基于机器学习的股四头肌脂肪垫(QFP)放射组学在使用Q-Dixon MRI区分髌骨股骨骨关节炎(PFOA)和非PFOA的实用性。这项诊断准确性研究回顾性分析了215例患者的数据(平均年龄:54.2±11.3岁;113名女性)。评估了三种预测模型:质子密度加权图像模型,脂肪分数模型和合并模型。采用方差分析进行特征选择,采用logistic回归进行分类。数据收集自培训、内部和外部测试队列。从Q-Dixon MRI序列中提取放射组学特征以区分PFOA和非PFOA。使用Delong检验分析的曲线下面积(AUC)值对三种模型的诊断性能进行比较。在训练集(109例)和内测集(73例)中,合并模型表现最佳,auc分别为0.836[95%置信区间(CI): 0.762-0.910]和0.826 (95% CI: 0.722-0.929)。在外部测试集(33例患者)中,该模型的AUC为0.885 (95% CI: 0.768-1.000),敏感性和特异性分别为0.833和0.933 (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessing the impact of a novel dynamic stretching routine targeting myofascial chains for warm-up in trained adults. Acute effects of strength training interventions on subjective, neuromuscular, and biochemical fatigue parameters in elite youth soccer players. AI based tool for monitoring intensity and fatigue in elite women handball. Editorial: Biomaterials, 3D printing technologies, and perspectives for bone and cartilage regeneration. Editorial: Preventing obesity-related degenerative diseases through lifestyle changes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1