James P. Hereward, Tobias J. Smith, Ros Gloag, Dean R. Brookes, Gimme H. Walter
{"title":"Reassessing Hybridisation in Australian Tetragonula Stingless Bees Using Multiple Genetic Markers","authors":"James P. Hereward, Tobias J. Smith, Ros Gloag, Dean R. Brookes, Gimme H. Walter","doi":"10.1002/ece3.70912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We re-examined reports of hybridisation in three cryptic stingless bee species in the genus <i>Tetragonula</i> in South East Queensland, Australia (<i>T. carbonaria</i>, <i>T. davenporti</i> and <i>T. hockingsi</i>). Previous studies on this group using microsatellite markers proposed that hybridisation occasionally takes place. In contrast, we find that using 1745 SNPs we could reliably separate the three species, with no evidence of contemporary (or recent) hybridisation. We found identical amplicon sequences of the nuclear gene <i>EF1alpha</i> across most individuals of the three species, but low and moderate species-specific polymorphisms in the nuclear gene <i>Opsin</i> and the mitochondrial <i>16S</i> rRNA gene, respectively, with no cases of mito-nuclear discordance at these genes. We confirm that nuclear divergence across these species is low, based on 10–26 kb of non-coding sequence flanking <i>EF1alpha</i> and <i>Opsin</i> (0.7%–1% pairwise difference between species). However, we find mitogenomes to be far more diverged than nuclear genomes (21.6%–23.6% pairwise difference between species). Based on these comprehensive analyses of multiple marker types, we conclude there is no ongoing gene flow among the <i>Tetragonula</i> species of South East Queensland, despite their morphological similarity to one another and the low nuclear divergence among them. The higher resolution provided by multiple SNP markers may lead to lower estimates of contemporary hybridisation more generally.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775563/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.70912","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We re-examined reports of hybridisation in three cryptic stingless bee species in the genus Tetragonula in South East Queensland, Australia (T. carbonaria, T. davenporti and T. hockingsi). Previous studies on this group using microsatellite markers proposed that hybridisation occasionally takes place. In contrast, we find that using 1745 SNPs we could reliably separate the three species, with no evidence of contemporary (or recent) hybridisation. We found identical amplicon sequences of the nuclear gene EF1alpha across most individuals of the three species, but low and moderate species-specific polymorphisms in the nuclear gene Opsin and the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene, respectively, with no cases of mito-nuclear discordance at these genes. We confirm that nuclear divergence across these species is low, based on 10–26 kb of non-coding sequence flanking EF1alpha and Opsin (0.7%–1% pairwise difference between species). However, we find mitogenomes to be far more diverged than nuclear genomes (21.6%–23.6% pairwise difference between species). Based on these comprehensive analyses of multiple marker types, we conclude there is no ongoing gene flow among the Tetragonula species of South East Queensland, despite their morphological similarity to one another and the low nuclear divergence among them. The higher resolution provided by multiple SNP markers may lead to lower estimates of contemporary hybridisation more generally.
期刊介绍:
Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment.
Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.