Telepsychiatry in post-pandemic India: A mixed methods exploration of patient perspectives and preferences toward telemedicine versus in-person consultations

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY General hospital psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.01.005
Pooja Shakya , Koushik Sinha Deb , Ragul Ganesh , Arnab Datta , Rohit Verma , Rakesh Chadda
{"title":"Telepsychiatry in post-pandemic India: A mixed methods exploration of patient perspectives and preferences toward telemedicine versus in-person consultations","authors":"Pooja Shakya ,&nbsp;Koushik Sinha Deb ,&nbsp;Ragul Ganesh ,&nbsp;Arnab Datta ,&nbsp;Rohit Verma ,&nbsp;Rakesh Chadda","doi":"10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Telepsychiatry saw wide acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic, when traditional healthcare facilities were inaccessible. Post-pandemic, however, user preferences for the service remain uncertain. This study explores user perceptions of telepsychiatry, particularly focusing on those who discontinued its use, to identify factors influencing service satisfaction and barriers to continued use.</div></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><div>A mixed methods study was conducted on interviews with 165 patients who had utilised telepsychiatry services at a tertiary care teaching hospital in north India. Quantitative data were collected on telepsychiatry dropout rates, and bivariate analyses identified differences between continuing users and discontinuers. Qualitative data were gathered via semi-structured interviews, thematically analysed, and coded to examine personal, illness-related, and socio-environmental determinants of service choice.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis revealed a telepsychiatry dropout rate of 56.4 %, once physical OPDs became operational. Eight major themes - convenience, cost &amp; time, therapeutic relationship, technological difficulty, service limitation, treatment outcome and privacy, affected telepsychiatry usage. Patients valued telepsychiatry for its convenience and time savings, while challenges such as brief consultations, frequent changes in doctors, and lack of privacy at home or work, prevented continued use. Technological barriers, especially for elderly and rural patients, and higher medication costs at local pharmacies were significant deterrents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Telepsychiatry service use is dependent on a dynamic interplay between clinical condition, resource availability with user, service quality and available alternatives. Addressing these challenges remain crucial for integrating telepsychiatry into primary healthcare and ensuring its long-term sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12517,"journal":{"name":"General hospital psychiatry","volume":"93 ","pages":"Pages 89-99"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General hospital psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163834325000052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Telepsychiatry saw wide acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic, when traditional healthcare facilities were inaccessible. Post-pandemic, however, user preferences for the service remain uncertain. This study explores user perceptions of telepsychiatry, particularly focusing on those who discontinued its use, to identify factors influencing service satisfaction and barriers to continued use.

Methodology

A mixed methods study was conducted on interviews with 165 patients who had utilised telepsychiatry services at a tertiary care teaching hospital in north India. Quantitative data were collected on telepsychiatry dropout rates, and bivariate analyses identified differences between continuing users and discontinuers. Qualitative data were gathered via semi-structured interviews, thematically analysed, and coded to examine personal, illness-related, and socio-environmental determinants of service choice.

Results

Analysis revealed a telepsychiatry dropout rate of 56.4 %, once physical OPDs became operational. Eight major themes - convenience, cost & time, therapeutic relationship, technological difficulty, service limitation, treatment outcome and privacy, affected telepsychiatry usage. Patients valued telepsychiatry for its convenience and time savings, while challenges such as brief consultations, frequent changes in doctors, and lack of privacy at home or work, prevented continued use. Technological barriers, especially for elderly and rural patients, and higher medication costs at local pharmacies were significant deterrents.

Conclusion

Telepsychiatry service use is dependent on a dynamic interplay between clinical condition, resource availability with user, service quality and available alternatives. Addressing these challenges remain crucial for integrating telepsychiatry into primary healthcare and ensuring its long-term sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General hospital psychiatry
General hospital psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
125
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: General Hospital Psychiatry explores the many linkages among psychiatry, medicine, and primary care. In emphasizing a biopsychosocial approach to illness and health, the journal provides a forum for professionals with clinical, academic, and research interests in psychiatry''s role in the mainstream of medicine.
期刊最新文献
Sex-based cardiovascular risk in depressive symptoms A randomized controlled trial of beta-blockers effects on cardiac anxiety Risk of falls associated with non-GABAergic hypnotics and benzodiazepines in hospitalized patients The longitudinal association of optimism with quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary heart disease; The THORESCI study Transforming primary care with transdiagnostic approaches: The future of mental health treatment through technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1