Valid knowledge of performance provided by a motion capturing system in shot put.

IF 2.6 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Frontiers in Sports and Active Living Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fspor.2024.1482701
Stefan Künzell, Anna Knoblich, Annika Stippler
{"title":"Valid knowledge of performance provided by a motion capturing system in shot put.","authors":"Stefan Künzell, Anna Knoblich, Annika Stippler","doi":"10.3389/fspor.2024.1482701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extended feedback on knowledge of performance in sports techniques is very challenging and requires a high level of expertise. This poses a significant problem for experiments on providing extended feedback, as it is essential to ensure that the \"correct\" feedback is given for it to be effective. In this study, we investigate whether the correct feedback can be determined based on kinematic data. Ten participants and one model were recorded during shot put using a Motion Capturing (MoCap) system and simultaneously captured on video. The videos were analysed by two experts, and the two most critical errors were noted. By qualitatively comparing the deviations of the participants from the model, the experts' error feedback was identified in the motion curves of the MoCap system. The expert feedback for two participants was sealed in an envelope. In a qualitative analysis of the motion data, the error feedback was then determined and subsequently compared with the experts' feedback. These error feedbacks largely matched. It was shown that, in principle, it is possible to extract errors from the kinematic angle and distance curves of the movement. This study opens the door to an automated version of the qualitative assessment of movements by AI. Further research can now focus on the topic of conveying AI-generated feedback. This could then also provide a valid foundation for experiments on the effects of knowledge of performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":12716,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","volume":"6 ","pages":"1482701"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11782156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sports and Active Living","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1482701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extended feedback on knowledge of performance in sports techniques is very challenging and requires a high level of expertise. This poses a significant problem for experiments on providing extended feedback, as it is essential to ensure that the "correct" feedback is given for it to be effective. In this study, we investigate whether the correct feedback can be determined based on kinematic data. Ten participants and one model were recorded during shot put using a Motion Capturing (MoCap) system and simultaneously captured on video. The videos were analysed by two experts, and the two most critical errors were noted. By qualitatively comparing the deviations of the participants from the model, the experts' error feedback was identified in the motion curves of the MoCap system. The expert feedback for two participants was sealed in an envelope. In a qualitative analysis of the motion data, the error feedback was then determined and subsequently compared with the experts' feedback. These error feedbacks largely matched. It was shown that, in principle, it is possible to extract errors from the kinematic angle and distance curves of the movement. This study opens the door to an automated version of the qualitative assessment of movements by AI. Further research can now focus on the topic of conveying AI-generated feedback. This could then also provide a valid foundation for experiments on the effects of knowledge of performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
铅球运动捕捉系统提供的有效的性能知识。
对运动技术表现知识的延伸反馈是非常具有挑战性的,需要高水平的专业知识。这给提供扩展反馈的实验带来了一个重大问题,因为确保提供“正确”的反馈是有效的必要条件。在这项研究中,我们研究了是否可以根据运动学数据确定正确的反馈。使用运动捕捉(MoCap)系统记录10名参与者和1名模特在铅球过程中并同时拍摄视频。两位专家对视频进行了分析,并指出了两个最严重的错误。通过定性比较参与者与模型的偏差,在动作捕捉系统的运动曲线中识别专家的误差反馈。两位参与者的专家反馈被密封在一个信封里。在对运动数据的定性分析中,确定误差反馈,并随后与专家反馈进行比较。这些误差反馈基本匹配。结果表明,原则上可以从运动的运动学角度和距离曲线中提取误差。这项研究为人工智能对动作进行定性评估的自动化版本打开了大门。进一步的研究现在可以集中在传达人工智能生成的反馈的主题上。这也可以为关于绩效知识影响的实验提供一个有效的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
459
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lower-body strength and power profiles and their relationships with shot velocity and accuracy in elite arena soccer players. Effects of a wrapping closure lacing system on wearing comfort, lock-in stability, and lower-limb muscle demand during prolonged running. Editorial: Training load in sport: current challenges and future perspectives, volume II. Attacking and goal-scoring trends among top teams in EHF EURO handball (2016-2024): implications for representative practice design. Step cadence to guide physical activity intensity in coronary heart disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1