Application of Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for the Detection of Pathogens in Pulmonary Infections.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection and Drug Resistance Pub Date : 2025-01-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IDR.S499265
Xianning Dai, Kai Xu, Yu Tong, Jing Li, Liya Dai, Jianyou Shi, Haibin Xie, Xi Chen
{"title":"Application of Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid for the Detection of Pathogens in Pulmonary Infections.","authors":"Xianning Dai, Kai Xu, Yu Tong, Jing Li, Liya Dai, Jianyou Shi, Haibin Xie, Xi Chen","doi":"10.2147/IDR.S499265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the utility of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for hospitalized patients with pulmonary infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 358 patients who received diagnosis and treatment for respiratory infections in the department of Respiratory Medicine at Wenzhou People's hospital from January 2023 to April 2024 were selected for this study. The BALF of the patients was analyzed using tNGS, and the diagnostic efficacy of tNGS was subsequently compared with that of conventional testing methods (CTs) for pathogen detection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through the analysis of tNGS from the cohort, the pathogen detection rate in BALF using tNGS was significantly higher than that of CTs (90.22% VS 57.26%, <i>P</i>=0.001). Among them, <i>Tropheryma Whipplei</i> (6.15%), <i>Bordetella pertussis</i> (2.51%), <i>Non-tuberculous mycobacteria</i> (1.96%), <i>Mycobacteria tuberculosis</i> (1.40%), <i>Chlamydia pneumoniae</i> (1.96%), <i>Chlamydia psittaci</i> (0.56%), <i>Legionella pneumophila</i> (0.28%) were detected using tNGS alone, and the CTs results of these microorganisms were all negative. Among the various types of mixed infections observed, concurrent presence of bacteria and viruses was the most common, accounting for 37.15%. The detection rates of tNGS and CTs have statistical significance (66.87% VS 35.12%, <i>P</i>=0.001). Furthermore, a total of 61 cases of antimicrobial resistance genes were detected, including 34 cases of 23S rRNA A2063G, 6 cases of KPC, 5 cases of OXA, 2 cases of CTX-M, 3 cases of IMP, 1 case of NDM and 13 cases of mecA. Using the clinical diagnosis as references, the positive coincidence rate of the tNGS was significantly higher compared to that of the CTs (<i>P</i>=0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to CTs, the application of tNGS enables the identification of a greater diversity of organisms and exhibits superior accuracy, effectively identifying pathogens that are undetectable by CTs, especially fastidious and atypical organisms. Consequently, it holds immense potential in pathogen diagnosis and offers valuable clinical guidance for patients with pulmonary infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":"18 ","pages":"511-522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S499265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the utility of targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) for hospitalized patients with pulmonary infections.

Methods: A cohort of 358 patients who received diagnosis and treatment for respiratory infections in the department of Respiratory Medicine at Wenzhou People's hospital from January 2023 to April 2024 were selected for this study. The BALF of the patients was analyzed using tNGS, and the diagnostic efficacy of tNGS was subsequently compared with that of conventional testing methods (CTs) for pathogen detection.

Results: Through the analysis of tNGS from the cohort, the pathogen detection rate in BALF using tNGS was significantly higher than that of CTs (90.22% VS 57.26%, P=0.001). Among them, Tropheryma Whipplei (6.15%), Bordetella pertussis (2.51%), Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (1.96%), Mycobacteria tuberculosis (1.40%), Chlamydia pneumoniae (1.96%), Chlamydia psittaci (0.56%), Legionella pneumophila (0.28%) were detected using tNGS alone, and the CTs results of these microorganisms were all negative. Among the various types of mixed infections observed, concurrent presence of bacteria and viruses was the most common, accounting for 37.15%. The detection rates of tNGS and CTs have statistical significance (66.87% VS 35.12%, P=0.001). Furthermore, a total of 61 cases of antimicrobial resistance genes were detected, including 34 cases of 23S rRNA A2063G, 6 cases of KPC, 5 cases of OXA, 2 cases of CTX-M, 3 cases of IMP, 1 case of NDM and 13 cases of mecA. Using the clinical diagnosis as references, the positive coincidence rate of the tNGS was significantly higher compared to that of the CTs (P=0.012).

Conclusion: Compared to CTs, the application of tNGS enables the identification of a greater diversity of organisms and exhibits superior accuracy, effectively identifying pathogens that are undetectable by CTs, especially fastidious and atypical organisms. Consequently, it holds immense potential in pathogen diagnosis and offers valuable clinical guidance for patients with pulmonary infections.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
靶向新一代测序在支气管肺泡灌洗液中检测肺部感染病原体的应用。
目的:本研究旨在评估支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)靶向新一代测序(tNGS)在肺部感染住院患者中的应用价值。方法:选取2023年1月至2024年4月在温州市人民医院呼吸内科诊治的呼吸道感染患者358例为研究对象。采用tNGS对患者的BALF进行分析,并将tNGS的诊断效果与传统的病原体检测方法(ct)进行比较。结果:通过对队列tNGS的分析,使用tNGS的BALF病原体检出率显著高于ct (90.22% VS 57.26%, P=0.001)。其中,单用tNGS检出惠普冷菌(6.15%)、百日咳博德氏菌(2.51%)、非结核分枝杆菌(1.96%)、结核分枝杆菌(1.40%)、肺炎衣原体(1.96%)、干燥衣原体(0.56%)、嗜肺军团菌(0.28%),ct结果均为阴性。在观察到的各种混合感染类型中,细菌和病毒同时存在最为常见,占37.15%。tNGS检出率与ct检出率比较,差异有统计学意义(66.87% VS 35.12%, P=0.001)。共检出61例耐药基因,其中23S rRNA A2063G 34例、KPC 6例、OXA 5例、CTX-M 2例、IMP 3例、NDM 1例、mecA 13例。以临床诊断为参照,tNGS的阳性符合率明显高于ct (P=0.012)。结论:与ct相比,tNGS的应用能够鉴定出更多样化的生物,并且具有更高的准确性,可以有效地鉴定出ct无法检测到的病原体,特别是挑剔和非典型生物。因此,它在病原体诊断方面具有巨大的潜力,为肺部感染患者提供了宝贵的临床指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection and Drug Resistance
Infection and Drug Resistance Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: About Journal Editors Peer Reviewers Articles Article Publishing Charges Aims and Scope Call For Papers ISSN: 1178-6973 Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.
期刊最新文献
A Rare Case of Concurrent Tropheryma Whipplei and Pneumocystis Jirovecii Pneumonia in a Patient During Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer. Epidemiological Characteristics and Spatiotemporal Clustering of Varicella in the Border City of Baise, Southwest China, 2010-2024. Prognostic Significance of BALF Neutrophil Percentage and Hypoxemia in Non-HIV Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study. LILRB1 Modulates Neutrophil Migration, NETosis, and Inflammation in Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Associated Bronchiectasis. Time to Awaken a Forgotten Antibacterial Agent: A 10-year Nationwide Surveillance of Latamoxef Resistance in China Based on 46,716 Isolates and Establishment of Tentative Epidemiological Cut-Off Values.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1