Differences of the Chest Images Between Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients and Influenza Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7150/ijms.98194
Yingying Han, Zhijia Wang, Xingzhao Li, Zhuan Zhong
{"title":"Differences of the Chest Images Between Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Patients and Influenza Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Yingying Han, Zhijia Wang, Xingzhao Li, Zhuan Zhong","doi":"10.7150/ijms.98194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza are two infectious diseases that can pose a great threat to human health. We aimed to compare the differences in chest images between patients with COVID-19 and influenza to deepen the understanding of these two diseases. <b>Methods:</b> We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for articles published before December 25, 2023, and performed a meta-analysis using Stata 14.0 with a random-effects model. The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-six articles with 2,159 COVID-19 patients and 1,568 influenza patients were included in the meta-analysis. By comparing chest computed tomography (CT) and chest X-ray, we found that COVID-19 patients had more peripheral lung lesions (OR=3.66, 95% CI: 1.84-7.31). Although COVID-19 patients had more bilateral lung involvement (OR=1.74, 95% CI: 0.90-3.38) and less unilateral lung involvement (OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.44-1.02), these two results were not statistically significant. Patients with COVID-19 showed more ground-glass opacities (OR=2.83, 95% CI: 1.85-4.32), reverse halo signs (OR=3.47, 95% CI: 2.37-5.08), interlobular septal thickening (OR=2.16, 95% CI: 1.55-3.01), vascular enlargement (OR=5.00, 95% CI: 1.80-13.85) and crazy-paving patterns (OR=2.63, 95% CI: 1.57-4.41) on chest images than patients with influenza. We also found that compared with influenza patients, pleural effusion was rare in COVID-19 patients (OR=0.15, 95% CI: 0.07-0.31). <b>Conclusions:</b> There are some differences in the manifestations and distributions of lesions between patients with COVID-19 and influenza on chest images, which is helpful to distinguish these two infectious diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":14031,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":"22 3","pages":"641-650"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783069/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.98194","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza are two infectious diseases that can pose a great threat to human health. We aimed to compare the differences in chest images between patients with COVID-19 and influenza to deepen the understanding of these two diseases. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for articles published before December 25, 2023, and performed a meta-analysis using Stata 14.0 with a random-effects model. The study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results: Twenty-six articles with 2,159 COVID-19 patients and 1,568 influenza patients were included in the meta-analysis. By comparing chest computed tomography (CT) and chest X-ray, we found that COVID-19 patients had more peripheral lung lesions (OR=3.66, 95% CI: 1.84-7.31). Although COVID-19 patients had more bilateral lung involvement (OR=1.74, 95% CI: 0.90-3.38) and less unilateral lung involvement (OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.44-1.02), these two results were not statistically significant. Patients with COVID-19 showed more ground-glass opacities (OR=2.83, 95% CI: 1.85-4.32), reverse halo signs (OR=3.47, 95% CI: 2.37-5.08), interlobular septal thickening (OR=2.16, 95% CI: 1.55-3.01), vascular enlargement (OR=5.00, 95% CI: 1.80-13.85) and crazy-paving patterns (OR=2.63, 95% CI: 1.57-4.41) on chest images than patients with influenza. We also found that compared with influenza patients, pleural effusion was rare in COVID-19 patients (OR=0.15, 95% CI: 0.07-0.31). Conclusions: There are some differences in the manifestations and distributions of lesions between patients with COVID-19 and influenza on chest images, which is helpful to distinguish these two infectious diseases.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者与流感患者胸部图像的差异:系统综述和meta分析
背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)和流感是对人类健康构成重大威胁的两种传染病。我们的目的是比较COVID-19和流感患者胸部图像的差异,以加深对这两种疾病的认识。方法:检索PubMed、Embase和Web of Science,检索2023年12月25日之前发表的文章,使用Stata 14.0进行meta分析,采用随机效应模型。本研究按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行。结果:meta分析纳入26篇文章,涉及2159例COVID-19患者和1568例流感患者。通过对比胸部CT和胸部x线,我们发现COVID-19患者有更多的周围肺病变(OR=3.66, 95% CI: 1.84-7.31)。虽然COVID-19患者双侧肺受累较多(OR=1.74, 95% CI: 0.90-3.38),单侧肺受累较少(OR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.44-1.02),但这两个结果无统计学意义。与流感患者相比,COVID-19患者在胸部图像上表现出更多的毛玻璃样混浊(OR=2.83, 95% CI: 1.85-4.32)、反向晕征(OR=3.47, 95% CI: 2.37-5.08)、小叶间隔增厚(OR=2.16, 95% CI: 1.55-3.01)、血管扩张(OR=5.00, 95% CI: 1.80-13.85)和疯狂铺路模式(OR=2.63, 95% CI: 1.57-4.41)。我们还发现,与流感患者相比,COVID-19患者很少出现胸腔积液(OR=0.15, 95% CI: 0.07-0.31)。结论:COVID-19与流感患者在胸部图像上的病变表现及分布存在一定差异,有助于区分这两种传染病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Sciences
International Journal of Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: Original research papers, reviews, and short research communications in any medical related area can be submitted to the Journal on the understanding that the work has not been published previously in whole or part and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. Manuscripts in basic science and clinical medicine are both considered. There is no restriction on the length of research papers and reviews, although authors are encouraged to be concise. Short research communication is limited to be under 2500 words.
期刊最新文献
IDH1 mutation creates a dependency on fatty acid metabolism that underlies sensitivity to cuproptosis in acute myeloid leukemia cells Reviewing the Peripheral and Central Mechanisms of Visceral Hypersensitivity in Intestinal Disorders. Visnagin Protects Against Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Acute Kidney Injury by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress and Reducing Ferroptosis. Low-Intensity Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Alleviates Detrusor Muscle Apoptosis and Extracellular Matrix Dysregulation in the Bladder of Diabetic Rats. Artemisia argyi-enhanced Mesenchymal Stem Cell Exosomes Alleviates Inflammation in C28/I2 Chondrocytes by inhibiting NF-κB.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1