Biosimilars for the treatment of psoriasis: a narrative review.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.23736/S2784-8671.24.08083-6
Duc B Phan, Zenas Z Yiu
{"title":"Biosimilars for the treatment of psoriasis: a narrative review.","authors":"Duc B Phan, Zenas Z Yiu","doi":"10.23736/S2784-8671.24.08083-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The introduction of systemic biologic therapies marked a significant advancement in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. However, the high cost associated with these treatments has considerably restricted their widespread utilization. The expiration of biologic patents has allowed the development of biosimilars - medications that are highly similar to approved biologics. Biosimilars hold the promise of reducing treatment costs, thereby enhancing patient access to biologic therapies and contributing to the sustainability of healthcare spending. Nonetheless, the unique regulatory pathways for biosimilars introduce uncertainties regarding their application in real-world psoriasis care. Adoption and regulation of biosimilars differ considerably across countries, reflecting diverse approaches and priorities within global healthcare systems. Potential variations between biosimilars and their originator biologics raise questions about their comparative effectiveness and safety. Current evidence supporting biosimilars for psoriasis treatment is largely based on a limited number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a notable lack of robust real-world evidence. As more biosimilars enter the market, evaluating their use in real-world settings is crucial to identify any differences in effectiveness and safety compared to originators or to enhance their uptake by improving the perceptions of physicians and patients. This review explores the opportunities and challenges presented by biosimilars and underscores the existing gaps in evidence regarding their use in psoriasis treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14526,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","volume":"159 6","pages":"663-675"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2784-8671.24.08083-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The introduction of systemic biologic therapies marked a significant advancement in the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis. However, the high cost associated with these treatments has considerably restricted their widespread utilization. The expiration of biologic patents has allowed the development of biosimilars - medications that are highly similar to approved biologics. Biosimilars hold the promise of reducing treatment costs, thereby enhancing patient access to biologic therapies and contributing to the sustainability of healthcare spending. Nonetheless, the unique regulatory pathways for biosimilars introduce uncertainties regarding their application in real-world psoriasis care. Adoption and regulation of biosimilars differ considerably across countries, reflecting diverse approaches and priorities within global healthcare systems. Potential variations between biosimilars and their originator biologics raise questions about their comparative effectiveness and safety. Current evidence supporting biosimilars for psoriasis treatment is largely based on a limited number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), with a notable lack of robust real-world evidence. As more biosimilars enter the market, evaluating their use in real-world settings is crucial to identify any differences in effectiveness and safety compared to originators or to enhance their uptake by improving the perceptions of physicians and patients. This review explores the opportunities and challenges presented by biosimilars and underscores the existing gaps in evidence regarding their use in psoriasis treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗牛皮癣的生物仿制药:叙述性回顾。
系统生物疗法的引入标志着中重度牛皮癣治疗的重大进展。然而,与这些处理有关的高费用大大限制了它们的广泛利用。生物专利的到期使得生物仿制药的发展成为可能,这些药物与已批准的生物制剂高度相似。生物仿制药有望降低治疗成本,从而提高患者获得生物疗法的机会,并有助于医疗保健支出的可持续性。尽管如此,生物仿制药的独特监管途径为其在现实世界银屑病治疗中的应用带来了不确定性。各国对生物仿制药的采用和监管差异很大,反映了全球卫生保健系统的不同方法和重点。生物仿制药与其原始生物制剂之间的潜在差异引发了对其相对有效性和安全性的质疑。目前支持牛皮癣生物仿制药治疗的证据主要基于有限数量的随机对照试验(rct),明显缺乏可靠的真实证据。随着越来越多的生物仿制药进入市场,评估其在现实环境中的使用对于识别与原始产品相比在有效性和安全性方面的任何差异或通过改善医生和患者的认知来提高其接受度至关重要。这篇综述探讨了生物类似药带来的机遇和挑战,并强调了生物类似药在牛皮癣治疗中的应用证据的现有差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
442
期刊最新文献
Dermatological manifestations in MORC2-related neuropathy and cerebellar atrophy. Tufted hair folliculitis as an unusual cutaneous manifestation of systemic Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Toxic epidermal necrolysis induced by lamotrigine with suspected venlafaxine-related relapse. Cutaneous metastasis of melanoma undergoing regression during targeted therapy: dermoscopic and histopathologic correlation. A 20-year perspective on leading authors to the Italian Journal of Dermatology and Venereology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1