Current evidence and indications for left atrial appendage closure

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.01.014
Masaya Shinohara MD, PhD , Mike Saji MD, PhD , Hideki Koike MD, PhD , Hiroshi Ohara MD, PhD , Yoshinari Enomoto MD, PhD , Rine Nakanishi MD, PhD , Tadashi Fujino MD, PhD , Takanori Ikeda MD, PhD, FJCC
{"title":"Current evidence and indications for left atrial appendage closure","authors":"Masaya Shinohara MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mike Saji MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hideki Koike MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Ohara MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yoshinari Enomoto MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Rine Nakanishi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Tadashi Fujino MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Takanori Ikeda MD, PhD, FJCC","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.01.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and its prevalence increases with age. The main and most severe complication of AF is ischemic stroke, yet an estimated 50 % of eligible patients cannot tolerate or are contraindicated to receive oral anticoagulation (OAC). In patients with AF, the left atrial appendage (LAA) is the main source of thrombus formation. Percutaneous LAA closure (LAAC) has emerged over the past two decades as a valuable alternative to OAC for reducing the risk of strokes and systemic embolisms in patients with AF who cannot tolerate long-term OAC. With newer generation devices such as the Watchman (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) and Amulet (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) gaining approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in recent years, the safety and efficacy of LAAC in specific populations intolerant to OAC have increased and more patients are being treated. This systematic review provides the indications for LAAC and the evidence for evaluating the use of the currently available device therapies. We also examine the current unsolved problems with patient selection and postprocedural antithrombotic regimens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":"85 4","pages":"Pages 268-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0914508725000140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and its prevalence increases with age. The main and most severe complication of AF is ischemic stroke, yet an estimated 50 % of eligible patients cannot tolerate or are contraindicated to receive oral anticoagulation (OAC). In patients with AF, the left atrial appendage (LAA) is the main source of thrombus formation. Percutaneous LAA closure (LAAC) has emerged over the past two decades as a valuable alternative to OAC for reducing the risk of strokes and systemic embolisms in patients with AF who cannot tolerate long-term OAC. With newer generation devices such as the Watchman (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA) and Amulet (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) gaining approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in recent years, the safety and efficacy of LAAC in specific populations intolerant to OAC have increased and more patients are being treated. This systematic review provides the indications for LAAC and the evidence for evaluating the use of the currently available device therapies. We also examine the current unsolved problems with patient selection and postprocedural antithrombotic regimens.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当前左心耳闭合的证据和适应症。
心房颤动(AF)是世界上最常见的心律失常,其患病率随着年龄的增长而增加。房颤的主要和最严重的并发症是缺血性卒中,但估计有50% %的符合条件的患者不能耐受或禁忌接受口服抗凝剂(OAC)。在房颤患者中,左心耳(LAA)是血栓形成的主要来源。在过去的二十年中,经皮LAA闭合术(LAAC)作为一种有价值的替代OAC的方法出现,用于降低不能耐受长期OAC的房颤患者中风和全身性栓塞的风险。随着Watchman (Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA)和Amulet (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA)等新一代设备近年来获得美国食品和药物管理局的批准,LAAC在对OAC不耐受的特定人群中的安全性和有效性有所提高,越来越多的患者正在接受治疗。本系统综述提供了LAAC的适应症和评估目前可用器械疗法使用的证据。我们还研究了目前未解决的问题,患者选择和术后抗血栓治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
The frequency and impact of previous admissions within 90 days of subsequent hospitalization for acute myocarditis: An analysis of the Nationwide readmission database. Association of Influenza Vaccination and Long-Term Outcomes among patients with cardiopulmonary disease: A Nationwide population-based cohort study. Author's reply: Comparing BREATH2 with HFA-PEFF and H2FPEF: Room for integration or redundancy? Author's reply: An evidence-based tool for screening for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in primary care: The BREATH2 score: Discussion from a statistical perspective. Interpretive considerations on real-world use of selexipag and parenteral prostacyclin in pulmonary arterial hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1