Missing the message to brain tumor patients: a 2023 twitter analysis among patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals in glioblastoma multiforme.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neuro-Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1007/s11060-025-04948-8
Jay A Jani, David Cowan, Lionel Ouonkap, Daniel Adesina, Tianwen Ma, Shumeng Chen, Salman Aldakhil, Kimberly B Hoang
{"title":"Missing the message to brain tumor patients: a 2023 twitter analysis among patients, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals in glioblastoma multiforme.","authors":"Jay A Jani, David Cowan, Lionel Ouonkap, Daniel Adesina, Tianwen Ma, Shumeng Chen, Salman Aldakhil, Kimberly B Hoang","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-04948-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Social media platforms, particularly Twitter (X), play an important role in healthcare communication by sharing information and personal disease experiences. We investigated glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) posting behaviors on Twitter by comparing patient and informal caregiver tweets to healthcare professional tweets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using Keyhole, a third-party analytics tool, we analyzed 1,639 tweets containing the keyword \"#glioblastoma\" from January 1 to December 31, 2023. Users were categorized as patients, informal caregivers, or healthcare professionals. We employed Generalized Estimating Equation models and multinomial distributions to compare sentiment, thematic, and frequency engagement patterns across stakeholder groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Informal caregivers produced the slight majority of tweets (51.6%), followed by healthcare professionals (39.0%). Informal caregivers expressed significantly more negative sentiments (relative to neutral ones) than healthcare professionals (p < 0.001). Thematic analysis revealed that patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) engaged in more emotional support than healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals were more likely than patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) to self-promote. Patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) tweeted more on survival/mortality than healthcare professionals. Additionally, patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) had a higher average posting frequency per user than healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that GBM patients and informal caregivers were more likely to discuss emotional aspects of GBM care, while healthcare professionals had more informational and professional motives. Healthcare professionals who address these emotional, social, and financial communication disconnects can make their social media engagement more meaningful to patients who are often at least one of the primary targets of these accounts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-04948-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Social media platforms, particularly Twitter (X), play an important role in healthcare communication by sharing information and personal disease experiences. We investigated glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) posting behaviors on Twitter by comparing patient and informal caregiver tweets to healthcare professional tweets.

Methods: Using Keyhole, a third-party analytics tool, we analyzed 1,639 tweets containing the keyword "#glioblastoma" from January 1 to December 31, 2023. Users were categorized as patients, informal caregivers, or healthcare professionals. We employed Generalized Estimating Equation models and multinomial distributions to compare sentiment, thematic, and frequency engagement patterns across stakeholder groups.

Results: Informal caregivers produced the slight majority of tweets (51.6%), followed by healthcare professionals (39.0%). Informal caregivers expressed significantly more negative sentiments (relative to neutral ones) than healthcare professionals (p < 0.001). Thematic analysis revealed that patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) engaged in more emotional support than healthcare professionals. Healthcare professionals were more likely than patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) to self-promote. Patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) tweeted more on survival/mortality than healthcare professionals. Additionally, patients (p < 0.001) and informal caregivers (p < 0.001) had a higher average posting frequency per user than healthcare professionals.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that GBM patients and informal caregivers were more likely to discuss emotional aspects of GBM care, while healthcare professionals had more informational and professional motives. Healthcare professionals who address these emotional, social, and financial communication disconnects can make their social media engagement more meaningful to patients who are often at least one of the primary targets of these accounts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
期刊最新文献
Correction to: Single-cell RNA-seq reveals diverse molecular signatures associated with Methotrexate resistance in primary central nervous system lymphoma cells. The LITT Fit in neuro-oncology: indications, imaging, and adjunctive therapies. A systematic review of stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic spinal sarcomas. Prognostic value of immunohistochemical staining for H3K27me3 and EZH2 in astrocytoma, IDH-mutant. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals diverse molecular signatures associated with Methotrexate resistance in primary central nervous system lymphoma cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1