Cost-Effectiveness of Hominis Placenta Therapy for Chronic Temporomandibular Disorder: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of oral rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1111/joor.13932
Doori Kim, Eun-San Kim, Koh-Woon Kim, Jae-Heung Cho, Yoon Jae Lee, In-Hyuk Ha
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Hominis Placenta Therapy for Chronic Temporomandibular Disorder: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial","authors":"Doori Kim,&nbsp;Eun-San Kim,&nbsp;Koh-Woon Kim,&nbsp;Jae-Heung Cho,&nbsp;Yoon Jae Lee,&nbsp;In-Hyuk Ha","doi":"10.1111/joor.13932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Hominis placenta (HP) exhibits anti-inflammatory, antiviral and nerve growth-promoting properties; however, there are limited studies about HP therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorder (TMD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HP therapy with that of physical therapy (PT) in patients with TMD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a 26-week multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT). Eighty-two patients with chronic TMD were randomly assigned to the HP and PT groups at a ratio of 1:1. Patients with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of ≥ 40 mm for temporomandibular joint pain and persistent pain for ≥ 3 months were included. The primary economic endpoint was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which analysed the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in the HP group. QALYs were calculated using EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and Short-Form 6D (SF-6D). The primary and secondary analyses were conducted from societal and healthcare perspectives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>HP therapy was the dominant treatment option from a societal perspective owing to its higher QALY and lower cost compared with those of PT. Differences in QALYs calculated using EQ-5D and SF-6D between the two groups were 0.015 and 0.034, respectively, while those in cost from societal perspectives and healthcare perspectives were −3764 and 113 USD, respectively. Analysis from a healthcare perspective indicated that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio calculated using the EQ-5D and SF-6D was 7786 and 3338 USD, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>HP therapy is a more cost-effective therapeutic option than PT for patients with chronic TMD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Trial Registration</h3>\n \n <p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04087005; Clinical Research Information Service KCT0004437</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":"52 6","pages":"807-816"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joor.13932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hominis placenta (HP) exhibits anti-inflammatory, antiviral and nerve growth-promoting properties; however, there are limited studies about HP therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorder (TMD).

Objective

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HP therapy with that of physical therapy (PT) in patients with TMD.

Methods

This cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a 26-week multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT). Eighty-two patients with chronic TMD were randomly assigned to the HP and PT groups at a ratio of 1:1. Patients with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of ≥ 40 mm for temporomandibular joint pain and persistent pain for ≥ 3 months were included. The primary economic endpoint was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which analysed the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in the HP group. QALYs were calculated using EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and Short-Form 6D (SF-6D). The primary and secondary analyses were conducted from societal and healthcare perspectives.

Results

HP therapy was the dominant treatment option from a societal perspective owing to its higher QALY and lower cost compared with those of PT. Differences in QALYs calculated using EQ-5D and SF-6D between the two groups were 0.015 and 0.034, respectively, while those in cost from societal perspectives and healthcare perspectives were −3764 and 113 USD, respectively. Analysis from a healthcare perspective indicated that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio calculated using the EQ-5D and SF-6D was 7786 and 3338 USD, respectively.

Conclusion

HP therapy is a more cost-effective therapeutic option than PT for patients with chronic TMD.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04087005; Clinical Research Information Service KCT0004437

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人类胎盘治疗慢性颞下颌疾病的成本-效果:一项经济评估和一项实用的随机对照试验。
背景:人胎素(HP)具有抗炎、抗病毒和促进神经生长的特性;然而,关于HP治疗颞下颌紊乱(TMD)的研究有限。目的:评价HP治疗与物理治疗(PT)治疗TMD患者的成本-效果。方法:本成本-效果分析与一项为期26周的多中心实用随机对照试验(RCT)一起进行。82例慢性TMD患者按1:1的比例随机分为HP组和PT组。纳入颞下颌关节疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分≥40 mm且持续疼痛≥3个月的患者。主要的经济终点是增量成本效益比,它分析了HP组中每个质量调整生命年(QALYs)获得的成本。使用EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D)和Short-Form 6D (SF-6D)计算质量因子。主要和次要分析是从社会和保健角度进行的。结果:HP治疗相对于PT治疗具有更高的QALY和更低的成本,从社会角度来看,HP治疗是主要的治疗方案。EQ-5D和SF-6D计算的两组QALY差异分别为0.015和0.034美元,而从社会角度和医疗保健角度计算的成本差异分别为-3764美元和113美元。从医疗保健角度分析表明,使用EQ-5D和SF-6D计算的增量成本效益比分别为7786美元和3338美元。结论:HP治疗慢性TMD比PT治疗更具成本效益。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04087005;临床研究信息服务KCT0004437。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Oral and Pharyngeal Functions in Patients in Medical-Dental Cooperation at an Acute Hospital. Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment for Pain Alleviation in Anterior Disc Displacement Without Reduction: An Evidence-Based Review and Model Exploration. Effects of Oral Health and Functional Characteristics on Taste Sensitivity in Older Adults: Comparative Analysis Using Solution and Taste Strip Tests. Comorbid Insomnia and Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Painful Temporomandibular Disorders: Association With Pain Intensity. Dental Implants in Adults With Intellectual Disabilities: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Part 1: Implant Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1