Cost-Effectiveness of Hominis Placenta Therapy for Chronic Temporomandibular Disorder: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial.
Doori Kim, Eun-San Kim, Koh-Woon Kim, Jae-Heung Cho, Yoon Jae Lee, In-Hyuk Ha
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Hominis Placenta Therapy for Chronic Temporomandibular Disorder: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial.","authors":"Doori Kim, Eun-San Kim, Koh-Woon Kim, Jae-Heung Cho, Yoon Jae Lee, In-Hyuk Ha","doi":"10.1111/joor.13932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hominis placenta (HP) exhibits anti-inflammatory, antiviral and nerve growth-promoting properties; however, there are limited studies about HP therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorder (TMD).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HP therapy with that of physical therapy (PT) in patients with TMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a 26-week multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT). Eighty-two patients with chronic TMD were randomly assigned to the HP and PT groups at a ratio of 1:1. Patients with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of ≥ 40 mm for temporomandibular joint pain and persistent pain for ≥ 3 months were included. The primary economic endpoint was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which analysed the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in the HP group. QALYs were calculated using EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and Short-Form 6D (SF-6D). The primary and secondary analyses were conducted from societal and healthcare perspectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HP therapy was the dominant treatment option from a societal perspective owing to its higher QALY and lower cost compared with those of PT. Differences in QALYs calculated using EQ-5D and SF-6D between the two groups were 0.015 and 0.034, respectively, while those in cost from societal perspectives and healthcare perspectives were -3764 and 113 USD, respectively. Analysis from a healthcare perspective indicated that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio calculated using the EQ-5D and SF-6D was 7786 and 3338 USD, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HP therapy is a more cost-effective therapeutic option than PT for patients with chronic TMD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04087005; Clinical Research Information Service KCT0004437.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hominis placenta (HP) exhibits anti-inflammatory, antiviral and nerve growth-promoting properties; however, there are limited studies about HP therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorder (TMD).
Objective: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of HP therapy with that of physical therapy (PT) in patients with TMD.
Methods: This cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted alongside a 26-week multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT). Eighty-two patients with chronic TMD were randomly assigned to the HP and PT groups at a ratio of 1:1. Patients with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score of ≥ 40 mm for temporomandibular joint pain and persistent pain for ≥ 3 months were included. The primary economic endpoint was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which analysed the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained in the HP group. QALYs were calculated using EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) and Short-Form 6D (SF-6D). The primary and secondary analyses were conducted from societal and healthcare perspectives.
Results: HP therapy was the dominant treatment option from a societal perspective owing to its higher QALY and lower cost compared with those of PT. Differences in QALYs calculated using EQ-5D and SF-6D between the two groups were 0.015 and 0.034, respectively, while those in cost from societal perspectives and healthcare perspectives were -3764 and 113 USD, respectively. Analysis from a healthcare perspective indicated that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio calculated using the EQ-5D and SF-6D was 7786 and 3338 USD, respectively.
Conclusion: HP therapy is a more cost-effective therapeutic option than PT for patients with chronic TMD.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04087005; Clinical Research Information Service KCT0004437.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.