Laser Hair Removal May Be a Primary Treatment of Pilonidal Disease: A Pilot Study

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS Journal of pediatric surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-25 DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162182
Kevin C. Janek , Meaghan Kenfield , Linda C. Stafford , Lily Stalter , Evie Carchman , Charles M. Leys , Peter Nichol , Adam Brinkman , Lisa M. Arkin , Hau D. Le
{"title":"Laser Hair Removal May Be a Primary Treatment of Pilonidal Disease: A Pilot Study","authors":"Kevin C. Janek ,&nbsp;Meaghan Kenfield ,&nbsp;Linda C. Stafford ,&nbsp;Lily Stalter ,&nbsp;Evie Carchman ,&nbsp;Charles M. Leys ,&nbsp;Peter Nichol ,&nbsp;Adam Brinkman ,&nbsp;Lisa M. Arkin ,&nbsp;Hau D. Le","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2025.162182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Pilonidal disease is a chronic skin disorder of the gluteal cleft in adolescents and young adults. No treatment is universally effective, and the heterogeneity of the disease and variability in treatment response frustrates patients and clinicians alike. Surgical treatment strategies focus on the removal of the sinus tracts. Post-operative laser hair removal (LHR) has demonstrated promise to reduce disease recurrence following surgery. LHR has yet to be investigated as a primary treatment strategy and may offer additional benefits.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A single-center prospective pilot study investigated laser hair removal as the primary treatment for moderate to severe pilonidal disease. Patients ages 13–35 with moderate to severe disease who were referred for surgical excision were recruited. Participants underwent 3–8 treatment sessions with the long-pulsed--Alexandrite (755 nm) laser by a dermatologist until hair removal endpoints were met. Patients with persistent symptoms after LHR underwent subsequent excision. Patients were subsequently followed in the pediatric surgery clinic at 6, 9, 12 and 18 months following LHR to evaluate for disease recurrence. Primary outcomes included resolution rates without surgical intervention and recurrence rates following surgical resection. Secondary outcomes included the number of episodes of infection and impact on quality of life, as assessed by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in patients ≥16 years of age, and the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) in patients &lt;16 years of age.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-two patients were enrolled, of which 18 were initiated and 15 completed the LHR sessions in the study, designed to the endpoint of the absence of terminal hair in the gluteal cleft. One patient withdrew prior to completion of the LHR sessions, and two withdrew from the study due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the 15 patients who completed the LHR sessions, all demonstrated significant improvement in hair follicle density in the treatment area, with no adverse events. Median number of laser treatments was 6. Six of 15 (40 %) who completed laser treatments had resolution without surgical intervention. Nine patients underwent surgery, of which 6 (67 %) resolved after one surgery, with 18 months of follow up to evaluate for recurrence. Quality of life scores improved after laser treatments (DLQI mean change −4.6, and Children's DLQI mean change −6.0)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Laser hair removal was well tolerated, without adverse events and with improved quality of life, in a patient population with moderate to severe pilonidal disease. Nearly half of patients had disease resolution without the need for surgical intervention. These findings underscore the potential for laser hair removal to improve disease outcomes in pilonidal disease, reducing the need for surgical intervention. Based on these results, laser hair removal might provide an effective primary treatment strategy for some patients, and could improve outcomes for those who require surgical intervention. Further research is needed to determine which patients would most likely benefit from this treatment strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level III.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":"60 4","pages":"Article 162182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022346825000272","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Pilonidal disease is a chronic skin disorder of the gluteal cleft in adolescents and young adults. No treatment is universally effective, and the heterogeneity of the disease and variability in treatment response frustrates patients and clinicians alike. Surgical treatment strategies focus on the removal of the sinus tracts. Post-operative laser hair removal (LHR) has demonstrated promise to reduce disease recurrence following surgery. LHR has yet to be investigated as a primary treatment strategy and may offer additional benefits.

Methods

A single-center prospective pilot study investigated laser hair removal as the primary treatment for moderate to severe pilonidal disease. Patients ages 13–35 with moderate to severe disease who were referred for surgical excision were recruited. Participants underwent 3–8 treatment sessions with the long-pulsed--Alexandrite (755 nm) laser by a dermatologist until hair removal endpoints were met. Patients with persistent symptoms after LHR underwent subsequent excision. Patients were subsequently followed in the pediatric surgery clinic at 6, 9, 12 and 18 months following LHR to evaluate for disease recurrence. Primary outcomes included resolution rates without surgical intervention and recurrence rates following surgical resection. Secondary outcomes included the number of episodes of infection and impact on quality of life, as assessed by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in patients ≥16 years of age, and the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) in patients <16 years of age.

Results

Twenty-two patients were enrolled, of which 18 were initiated and 15 completed the LHR sessions in the study, designed to the endpoint of the absence of terminal hair in the gluteal cleft. One patient withdrew prior to completion of the LHR sessions, and two withdrew from the study due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Of the 15 patients who completed the LHR sessions, all demonstrated significant improvement in hair follicle density in the treatment area, with no adverse events. Median number of laser treatments was 6. Six of 15 (40 %) who completed laser treatments had resolution without surgical intervention. Nine patients underwent surgery, of which 6 (67 %) resolved after one surgery, with 18 months of follow up to evaluate for recurrence. Quality of life scores improved after laser treatments (DLQI mean change −4.6, and Children's DLQI mean change −6.0)

Conclusion

Laser hair removal was well tolerated, without adverse events and with improved quality of life, in a patient population with moderate to severe pilonidal disease. Nearly half of patients had disease resolution without the need for surgical intervention. These findings underscore the potential for laser hair removal to improve disease outcomes in pilonidal disease, reducing the need for surgical intervention. Based on these results, laser hair removal might provide an effective primary treatment strategy for some patients, and could improve outcomes for those who require surgical intervention. Further research is needed to determine which patients would most likely benefit from this treatment strategy.

Level of evidence

Level III.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
激光脱毛可能是毛鞘疾病的主要治疗方法:一项初步研究。
简介:毛囊病是一种慢性皮肤疾病的臀裂在青少年和年轻人。没有一种治疗方法是普遍有效的,疾病的异质性和治疗反应的可变性使患者和临床医生都感到沮丧。手术治疗策略侧重于窦束的切除。术后激光脱毛(LHR)已被证明有希望减少手术后疾病的复发。LHR作为一种主要治疗策略尚未进行研究,并可能提供额外的益处。方法:一项单中心前瞻性先导研究探讨了激光脱毛作为中重度毛鞘疾病的主要治疗方法。招募年龄在13-35岁之间的中度至重度疾病患者,这些患者被推荐进行手术切除。在皮肤科医生的指导下,参与者接受了3-8次长脉冲亚历山大变石(755 nm)激光治疗,直到达到脱毛终点。LHR后症状持续的患者接受后续切除。患者随后在LHR后6、9、12和18个月在儿科外科诊所随访,以评估疾病复发。主要结果包括无手术干预的缓解率和手术切除后的复发率。次要结局包括感染发作次数和对生活质量的影响,通过≥16岁患者的皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)和患者的儿童皮肤病生活质量指数(CDLQI)进行评估。结果:22名患者入组,其中18名患者在研究中开始了LHR治疗,15名患者完成了LHR治疗,设计的终点是臀裂终末毛的缺失。一名患者在LHR会议完成前退出,两名患者因COVID-19大流行退出研究。在完成LHR疗程的15名患者中,所有患者在治疗区域的毛囊密度均有显著改善,无不良事件发生。激光治疗的中位数为6次。完成激光治疗的15人中有6人(40%)在没有手术干预的情况下得到了缓解。9例患者接受手术治疗,其中6例(67%)在一次手术后痊愈,随访18个月评估复发情况。激光治疗后生活质量评分改善(DLQI平均变化-4.6,儿童DLQI平均变化-6.0)结论:在中重度毛毛疾病患者中,激光脱毛耐受性良好,无不良事件,生活质量得到改善。近一半的患者在不需要手术干预的情况下疾病得到了缓解。这些发现强调了激光脱毛的潜力,以改善疾病的预后在毛鞘疾病,减少手术干预的需要。基于这些结果,激光脱毛可能为一些患者提供一种有效的初级治疗策略,并可能改善那些需要手术干预的患者的预后。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些患者最有可能从这种治疗策略中受益。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
期刊最新文献
Multicenter analysis of time interval to intussusception reduction: Success and complication rates Preliminary application and efficacy evaluation of the modified Lich-Gregoir technique in the management of primary obstructive megaureter Opioid-sparing utility of subcutaneous analgesia systems in pediatric oncology patients following major tumor resection surgery: a matched case–control study Clinical relevance of postoperative biomarkers in pediatric endourology: Is procalcitonin telling the truth? Outcomes following adoption and integration of robotic-assisted cholecystectomy for pediatric biliary tract disease: An eight-year, single-center experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1