Prognosis of Fragment Reattachment in Anterior Crown Fractures: A Retrospective Study

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1111/jerd.13429
Lisu Sung, Hyemin Ku, Yooseok Shin, Salma Swaid, Dohyun Kim, Byoung-Duck Roh
{"title":"Prognosis of Fragment Reattachment in Anterior Crown Fractures: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Lisu Sung,&nbsp;Hyemin Ku,&nbsp;Yooseok Shin,&nbsp;Salma Swaid,&nbsp;Dohyun Kim,&nbsp;Byoung-Duck Roh","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Although several studies have compared fragment attachment with resin build-ups in anterior crown fractures, none have specifically investigated the outcome of reattached fragments. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of fragment reattachment in anterior crown fractures and determine the prognostic affecting their success.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed clinical records of patients who underwent fragment reattachment for crown fractures in anterior teeth (maxillary and mandibular central and lateral incisors) between 2008 and 2023. All procedures were performed by experienced professors and residents following a standardized protocol. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate fragment retention outcomes and identify potential prognostic factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among 75 anterior crown fractures, the estimated fragment retention rates were 83.7% at 2 years, 75.2% at 5 years, and 56.4% at 10 years. Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified patient age and extent of crown fracture as significant factors affecting outcomes. The 5-year estimated fragment retention rates were 82.8% and 67.0% for uncomplicated and complicated crown fractures, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Fragment reattachment remains a viable treatment option for anterior crown fractures. Treatment success decreased with patient age, and complicated crown fractures demonstrated lower retention rates than uncomplicated ones.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\n \n <p>Fragment reattachment can provide predictable outcomes in anterior crown fractures when cases are carefully selected, particularly considering the patient's age and the type of crown fracture.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":"37 6","pages":"1557-1566"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jerd.13429","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jerd.13429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Although several studies have compared fragment attachment with resin build-ups in anterior crown fractures, none have specifically investigated the outcome of reattached fragments. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of fragment reattachment in anterior crown fractures and determine the prognostic affecting their success.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed clinical records of patients who underwent fragment reattachment for crown fractures in anterior teeth (maxillary and mandibular central and lateral incisors) between 2008 and 2023. All procedures were performed by experienced professors and residents following a standardized protocol. Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate fragment retention outcomes and identify potential prognostic factors.

Results

Among 75 anterior crown fractures, the estimated fragment retention rates were 83.7% at 2 years, 75.2% at 5 years, and 56.4% at 10 years. Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified patient age and extent of crown fracture as significant factors affecting outcomes. The 5-year estimated fragment retention rates were 82.8% and 67.0% for uncomplicated and complicated crown fractures, respectively.

Conclusions

Fragment reattachment remains a viable treatment option for anterior crown fractures. Treatment success decreased with patient age, and complicated crown fractures demonstrated lower retention rates than uncomplicated ones.

Clinical Significance

Fragment reattachment can provide predictable outcomes in anterior crown fractures when cases are carefully selected, particularly considering the patient's age and the type of crown fracture.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前冠骨折碎片再附着的预后:回顾性研究。
目的:虽然有几项研究比较了前冠骨折的碎片附着与树脂堆积,但没有一项研究专门研究了碎片再附着的结果。本回顾性研究旨在评估前冠骨折碎片再附着的长期结果,并确定影响其成功的预后。材料和方法:我们回顾性分析2008年至2023年间前牙(上颌和下颌中门牙和侧门牙)冠骨折行碎片再植的患者的临床记录。所有的手术都由经验丰富的教授和住院医生按照标准化的方案进行。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线和Cox比例风险回归分析评估碎片保留结果并确定潜在的预后因素。结果:在75例前冠骨折中,估计2年碎片保留率为83.7%,5年为75.2%,10年为56.4%。多因素Cox回归分析发现患者年龄和冠状骨折程度是影响结果的重要因素。无并发症和复杂冠骨折的5年估计碎片保留率分别为82.8%和67.0%。结论:碎片再附着仍然是治疗前冠骨折的可行选择。治疗成功率随患者年龄的增长而下降,复杂冠骨折的保留率低于非复杂冠骨折。临床意义:当仔细选择病例时,特别是考虑到患者的年龄和冠骨折的类型,碎片再附着可以提供可预测的前冠骨折的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Influence of Scanning Pattern and Scanning Technology on the Trueness and Precision of the Denture Reference Technique. Replacing the Unilateral Missing Maxillary Lateral Incisor: An Objective and Subjective Comparison of Autotransplantation versus Orthodontic Canine Substitution. Effects of Substructure Color and Restoration Thickness on the Final Color of Ultra-Translucent Zirconia Ceramics. Color and Translucency Stability of Additively Manufactured Interim Dental Restorative Materials: An In Vitro Aging Simulation Study. Effects of Bleaching Protocols on the Esthetic Outcome and Surface Integrity of Enamel Treated With an Ammonia-Free Silver Fluoride Solution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1