The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation montages on motor learning across various brain regions: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.01.058
Fatemeh Ehsani , Ahmad Jayedi , Fatemeh Motaharinezhad , Shapour Jaberzadeh
{"title":"The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation montages on motor learning across various brain regions: A systematic review and network meta-analysis","authors":"Fatemeh Ehsani ,&nbsp;Ahmad Jayedi ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Motaharinezhad ,&nbsp;Shapour Jaberzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroscience.2025.01.058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an effective rehabilitation strategy that promotes motor learning. The related studies reported different findings through different modalities of tDCS over different brain regions. This study aimed to identify the optimal effects of tDCS on motor learning through a systematic review and network <em>meta</em>-analysis, focusing on determining the best electrode montage and assessing the efficacy of various tDCS configurations. The search was performed from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception until April 15, 2022. Nineteen eligible studies were included in the study. The findings indicated that motor cortex (M1) a-tDCS and cerebellar a-tDCS significantly enhance motor learning (short-term and long-term efficacy on both parameters of motor learning; Response Time (RT) and Error Rate (ER)) more than posterior parietal cortex (PPC) a-tDCS (P &lt; 0.5,0.65 to 90 % in SUCRA). Dual site tDCS enhances motor learning (efficacy on parameters of motor learning; RT and ER), with more efficacy as compared to unilateral tDCS (P &lt; 0.05, 78 % to 84 % in SUCRA). In addition, the findings indicated that PPC a-tDCS has the least efficacy of motor learning as compared to the other tDCS interventions (P &lt; 0.05, 0.5 % to 0.13 %). It is suggested that dual site tDCS and M1 or cerebellar a-tDCS be used, as compared to other tDCS interventions in other brain regions, for the improvement of motor learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19142,"journal":{"name":"Neuroscience","volume":"569 ","pages":"Pages 32-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452225000740","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an effective rehabilitation strategy that promotes motor learning. The related studies reported different findings through different modalities of tDCS over different brain regions. This study aimed to identify the optimal effects of tDCS on motor learning through a systematic review and network meta-analysis, focusing on determining the best electrode montage and assessing the efficacy of various tDCS configurations. The search was performed from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception until April 15, 2022. Nineteen eligible studies were included in the study. The findings indicated that motor cortex (M1) a-tDCS and cerebellar a-tDCS significantly enhance motor learning (short-term and long-term efficacy on both parameters of motor learning; Response Time (RT) and Error Rate (ER)) more than posterior parietal cortex (PPC) a-tDCS (P < 0.5,0.65 to 90 % in SUCRA). Dual site tDCS enhances motor learning (efficacy on parameters of motor learning; RT and ER), with more efficacy as compared to unilateral tDCS (P < 0.05, 78 % to 84 % in SUCRA). In addition, the findings indicated that PPC a-tDCS has the least efficacy of motor learning as compared to the other tDCS interventions (P < 0.05, 0.5 % to 0.13 %). It is suggested that dual site tDCS and M1 or cerebellar a-tDCS be used, as compared to other tDCS interventions in other brain regions, for the improvement of motor learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroscience
Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
394
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: Neuroscience publishes papers describing the results of original research on any aspect of the scientific study of the nervous system. Any paper, however short, will be considered for publication provided that it reports significant, new and carefully confirmed findings with full experimental details.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Tangeretin enhances sedative activity of diazepam in Swiss mice through GABAA receptor interaction: In vivo and in silico approaches Alterations in degree centrality and functional connectivity associated with cognitive Impairment in myotonic dystrophy type 1:A Preliminary functional MRI study. Tips for Quality Publishing; Lessons from the Neuroscience Editorial Team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1