Virtual Tissue Microarrays for Validating Digital Biomarker Analysis in Colorectal Carcinomaf

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Laboratory Investigation Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.labinv.2025.104098
Margarita Melnikova Jørgensen , Stephen Jacques Hamilton-Dutoit , Jesper Bertram Bramsen , Claus Lindbjerg Andersen , Ida Elisabeth Holm
{"title":"Virtual Tissue Microarrays for Validating Digital Biomarker Analysis in Colorectal Carcinomaf","authors":"Margarita Melnikova Jørgensen ,&nbsp;Stephen Jacques Hamilton-Dutoit ,&nbsp;Jesper Bertram Bramsen ,&nbsp;Claus Lindbjerg Andersen ,&nbsp;Ida Elisabeth Holm","doi":"10.1016/j.labinv.2025.104098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are used for high-throughput biomarker discovery and validation. Although TMAs have numerous advantages, they may not always be representative of the tissue heterogeneity present in whole tissue sections (WTS) leading to inadequate biomarker quantification. In this pilot study, we studied biomarker expression in 50 randomly selected colorectal cancers and 36 microsatellite unstable cases with or without <em>BRAF</em> variants. We used virtual TMAs to determine the minimum number of tissue cores needed to quantify biomarkers with the same precision as when using WTS. Paraffin sections were immunohistochemically stained for markers of T cells, B cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and macrophages. Digitized WTS were divided into tumor center (TC) and invasive margin regions. The minimum number of virtual TMA cores in each region was determined by Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement. Bland-Altman plots showed substantial disagreement between TMAs and WTS, being highest for 3 cores and decreasing with increasing core numbers. However, even when using 8 cores, the limits of agreement between TMA and WTS were wide, indicating a high degree of measuring uncertainty using TMAs. When using 3 or 4 cores, TMAs underestimated the expression of all the biomarkers in the TC; similarly, levels of macrophage markers in the TC, and levels of B cells in both the TC and the invasive margin remained considerably underestimated, even when using the maximum number of cores possible. However, 3 cores were sufficient to adequately classify biomarkers into categoric low and high expression groups. Microsatellite unstable tumors were characterized by high heterogeneity, which was further increased in the presence of <em>BRAF</em> variant(s). The virtual TMA technique is a useful method to establish the minimum number of cores to be included when constructing tumor TMAs for biomarker analysis. Our results emphasize the importance of TMA validation for a specific biomarker prior to conducting larger clinical studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17930,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Investigation","volume":"105 4","pages":"Article 104098"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002368372500008X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) are used for high-throughput biomarker discovery and validation. Although TMAs have numerous advantages, they may not always be representative of the tissue heterogeneity present in whole tissue sections (WTS) leading to inadequate biomarker quantification. In this pilot study, we studied biomarker expression in 50 randomly selected colorectal cancers and 36 microsatellite unstable cases with or without BRAF variants. We used virtual TMAs to determine the minimum number of tissue cores needed to quantify biomarkers with the same precision as when using WTS. Paraffin sections were immunohistochemically stained for markers of T cells, B cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and macrophages. Digitized WTS were divided into tumor center (TC) and invasive margin regions. The minimum number of virtual TMA cores in each region was determined by Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement. Bland-Altman plots showed substantial disagreement between TMAs and WTS, being highest for 3 cores and decreasing with increasing core numbers. However, even when using 8 cores, the limits of agreement between TMA and WTS were wide, indicating a high degree of measuring uncertainty using TMAs. When using 3 or 4 cores, TMAs underestimated the expression of all the biomarkers in the TC; similarly, levels of macrophage markers in the TC, and levels of B cells in both the TC and the invasive margin remained considerably underestimated, even when using the maximum number of cores possible. However, 3 cores were sufficient to adequately classify biomarkers into categoric low and high expression groups. Microsatellite unstable tumors were characterized by high heterogeneity, which was further increased in the presence of BRAF variant(s). The virtual TMA technique is a useful method to establish the minimum number of cores to be included when constructing tumor TMAs for biomarker analysis. Our results emphasize the importance of TMA validation for a specific biomarker prior to conducting larger clinical studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于验证结直肠癌数字生物标志物分析的虚拟组织微阵列。
组织微阵列(tma)用于高通量生物标志物的发现和验证。虽然tma有许多优点,但它们可能并不总是代表整个组织切片(WTS)中存在的组织异质性,从而导致生物标志物量化不足。在这项初步研究中,我们研究了50例随机选择的结直肠癌和36例伴有或不伴有BRAF变异的MSI患者的生物标志物表达。我们使用虚拟tma来确定量化生物标志物所需的最小组织核数,其精度与使用WTS时相同。对石蜡切片进行免疫组织化学染色,检测t细胞、b细胞、癌相关成纤维细胞和巨噬细胞的标志物。数字化后的WTS分为肿瘤中心区(TC)和浸润边缘区(IM)。每个区域的最小虚拟TMA核数由Bland-Altman图确定,一致性限为95%。Bland-Altman图显示tma和WTS之间存在显著差异,在3个核心时最高,随着核心数量的增加而降低。然而,即使在使用8芯时,TMA和WTS之间的一致性范围也很广,这表明使用TMA测量的不确定性很高。当使用3或4个核心时,tma低估了TC中所有生物标志物的表达;同样,TC中的巨噬细胞标记物水平以及TC和IM中的b细胞水平仍然被大大低估,即使使用最大数量的核也是如此。然而,3个核心足以将生物标志物充分划分为低表达组和高表达组。微卫星不稳定肿瘤具有高度异质性,BRAF变异的存在进一步增加了异质性。在构建用于生物标志物分析的肿瘤TMA时,虚拟TMA技术是建立最小核数的有效方法。我们的研究结果强调了在进行大规模临床研究之前对特定生物标志物进行TMA验证的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Laboratory Investigation
Laboratory Investigation 医学-病理学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
125
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Laboratory Investigation is an international journal owned by the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology. Laboratory Investigation offers prompt publication of high-quality original research in all biomedical disciplines relating to the understanding of human disease and the application of new methods to the diagnosis of disease. Both human and experimental studies are welcome.
期刊最新文献
General Pathologists Achieve Near-Specialist Diagnostic Performance Using Deep Learning–Based Virtual Staining for Donor Kidney Assessment: A Retrospective-Prospective Diagnostic Concordance Study Scoring Reliability of c-Met Immunohistochemical Assays in Lung Adenocarcinoma Atypical Ductular Reactions Are a Distinct Regenerative Phenomenon in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients after Transarterial Chemoembolization. PD-L1 Testing in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: National Practice and Interlaboratory Variation in the Netherlands. The Value of Internal Positive Controls and Synthetic Calibrators for Performance Assessment of Breast Carcinoma Estrogen Receptor Immunohistochemistry Assay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1