Accuracy of Visual Estimation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Compared With Echocardiography in Children.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003349
Seyfeddine Zayani, Farah Thabet, Abir Daya, Ikram Chamtouri, Cyrine Bennasrallah, Chokri Chouchane, Khaldoun Ben Hamda, Slaheddine Chouchane
{"title":"Accuracy of Visual Estimation of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Compared With Echocardiography in Children.","authors":"Seyfeddine Zayani, Farah Thabet, Abir Daya, Ikram Chamtouri, Cyrine Bennasrallah, Chokri Chouchane, Khaldoun Ben Hamda, Slaheddine Chouchane","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared visual assessments of left ventricular systolic function in children by pediatric physicians with quantitative measurements using the Simpson method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a transverse, cohort study conducted between January and June 2023. Patient's echocardiography were performed by a certified pediatric cardiologist in the presence of 2 pediatricians: a senior pediatric intensivist (S.Z.) and a pediatric resident (A.D.). Both pediatricians had prior training in cardiac ultrasound. Following the visual assessment of the echocardiography, each pediatrician records their evaluation of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a percentage. We compared the visual assessment of LVEF with that obtained with quantitative measurements using the Simpson method by the pediatric cardiologist. Bland-Altman analysis was performed between the pediatrician and the cardiologist's LVEF evaluation. Besides the correlation coefficients ( r ) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 patients, aged between 0 and 18 years, were enrolled. The mean LVEF measured by the cardiologist was 65.05±14.15. The mean LVEF estimated by the senior pediatrician and the pediatric resident was 64.48±13.59 and 64.87±13.17, respectively. Strong correlations were found between visual estimates by both pediatricians and 2-dimensional LVEF ( r =0.832 and r =0.763 respectively, P <0.001). The bland-Altman plot showed that the mean difference of LVEF determined by 2-dimensional LVEF and eyeballing by a senior pediatric intensivist and the junior pediatrician was 0.57±3.64% and 0.18±4.37%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that visual assessment of LVEF in children is reliable when conducted by experienced pediatricians familiar with echocardiography. However, the results of this study are primarily applicable to the assessment of normal or near-normal left ventricular function.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"359-364"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study compared visual assessments of left ventricular systolic function in children by pediatric physicians with quantitative measurements using the Simpson method.

Methods: This was a transverse, cohort study conducted between January and June 2023. Patient's echocardiography were performed by a certified pediatric cardiologist in the presence of 2 pediatricians: a senior pediatric intensivist (S.Z.) and a pediatric resident (A.D.). Both pediatricians had prior training in cardiac ultrasound. Following the visual assessment of the echocardiography, each pediatrician records their evaluation of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a percentage. We compared the visual assessment of LVEF with that obtained with quantitative measurements using the Simpson method by the pediatric cardiologist. Bland-Altman analysis was performed between the pediatrician and the cardiologist's LVEF evaluation. Besides the correlation coefficients ( r ) were calculated.

Results: A total of 136 patients, aged between 0 and 18 years, were enrolled. The mean LVEF measured by the cardiologist was 65.05±14.15. The mean LVEF estimated by the senior pediatrician and the pediatric resident was 64.48±13.59 and 64.87±13.17, respectively. Strong correlations were found between visual estimates by both pediatricians and 2-dimensional LVEF ( r =0.832 and r =0.763 respectively, P <0.001). The bland-Altman plot showed that the mean difference of LVEF determined by 2-dimensional LVEF and eyeballing by a senior pediatric intensivist and the junior pediatrician was 0.57±3.64% and 0.18±4.37%, respectively.

Conclusion: The study suggests that visual assessment of LVEF in children is reliable when conducted by experienced pediatricians familiar with echocardiography. However, the results of this study are primarily applicable to the assessment of normal or near-normal left ventricular function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目测儿童左心室射血分数与超声心动图的准确性比较。
背景:本研究比较了儿科医生对儿童左心室收缩功能的目视评估与辛普森法的定量测量。方法:这是一项横向队列研究,于2023年1月至6月进行。患者的超声心动图由一名有资格的儿科心脏病专家在两名儿科医生在场的情况下完成:一名高级儿科重症医师(S.Z.)和一名儿科住院医师(A.D.)。两位儿科医生之前都接受过心脏超声的培训。在超声心动图目视评估之后,每位儿科医生记录他们对左心室射血分数(LVEF)的评估。我们比较了LVEF的目视评估与儿科心脏病专家使用辛普森法定量测量获得的结果。在儿科医生和心脏病专家的LVEF评估之间进行Bland-Altman分析。并计算相关系数(r)。结果:共纳入136例患者,年龄在0 ~ 18岁之间。心内科医生测量的平均LVEF为65.05±14.15。高级儿科医生和儿科住院医师估计的平均LVEF分别为64.48±13.59和64.87±13.17。儿科医生的视觉估计值与二维LVEF之间存在较强的相关性(r=0.832和r=0.763)。结论:本研究表明,由熟悉超声心动图的经验丰富的儿科医生进行儿童LVEF的视觉评估是可靠的。然而,本研究的结果主要适用于评估正常或接近正常的左心室功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
期刊最新文献
CT Scan Utilization Decreases With Implementation of a Clinical Pathway for Children With Suspected Acute Appendicitis. Performance of Open-Source LLMs in Identifying Pediatric Pneumonia From Free-Text Chest Radiograph Reports. Implementation of a Standardized Management Algorithm for Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome in a Pediatric Emergency Department. Determining a Consensus-Based Measure for Critical Illness and Injury for Children Cared for By Emergency Medical Services. Association of Serum Eosinophilic Cationic Protein With Disease Severity in Infant Bronchiolitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1