Patient-reported strategies for prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09190-6
Daniel L Hertz, Mary Tanay, Cindy Tofthagen, Emanuela Rossi, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Katharine E Sheffield, Martha Carlson, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Lisa Grech, Diane Von Ah, Samantha J Mayo, Kathryn J Ruddy, Alexandre Chan, Paola Alberti, Maryam B Lustberg
{"title":"Patient-reported strategies for prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.","authors":"Daniel L Hertz, Mary Tanay, Cindy Tofthagen, Emanuela Rossi, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Katharine E Sheffield, Martha Carlson, Larissa Nekhlyudov, Lisa Grech, Diane Von Ah, Samantha J Mayo, Kathryn J Ruddy, Alexandre Chan, Paola Alberti, Maryam B Lustberg","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09190-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating toxicity of many drugs used in cancer treatment. There are numerous available strategies for preventing or treating CIPN, but few are guideline-recommended, due to limited evidence of their effectiveness. The primary objective of this survey was to understand what strategies patients used to prevent or treat CIPN, and to understand their perceptions around CIPN prevention and treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Neurological Complications Study Group created a cross-sectional online survey to recruit individuals who are currently or had previously received neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment and self-reported peripheral neuropathy. Descriptive statistics were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the 447 survey participants did not use any CIPN prevention strategy (71%), though given options of any strategy the plurality preferred a prescribed medication or supplement (30%). The most common treatment strategy used was exercise (47%), with some patients trying prescription medications including non-guideline recommended gabapentin (33%) or guideline-recommended duloxetine (8%) options. Nearly half of participants (49%) used at least one non-prescribed medication for treating CIPN. Patients often followed suggestions of their medical oncology clinical team, but sometimes relied on the internet or other patients to recommend non-prescription strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the absence of many guideline-recommended strategies for CIPN prevention and treatment, some patients use options with minimal evidence of effectiveness. Additional research is needed to determine which strategies are effective for prevention and treatment so these can be implemented in practice to improve treatment outcomes in patients with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 2","pages":"142"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09190-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating toxicity of many drugs used in cancer treatment. There are numerous available strategies for preventing or treating CIPN, but few are guideline-recommended, due to limited evidence of their effectiveness. The primary objective of this survey was to understand what strategies patients used to prevent or treat CIPN, and to understand their perceptions around CIPN prevention and treatment.

Methods: The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Neurological Complications Study Group created a cross-sectional online survey to recruit individuals who are currently or had previously received neurotoxic chemotherapy treatment and self-reported peripheral neuropathy. Descriptive statistics were reported.

Results: Most of the 447 survey participants did not use any CIPN prevention strategy (71%), though given options of any strategy the plurality preferred a prescribed medication or supplement (30%). The most common treatment strategy used was exercise (47%), with some patients trying prescription medications including non-guideline recommended gabapentin (33%) or guideline-recommended duloxetine (8%) options. Nearly half of participants (49%) used at least one non-prescribed medication for treating CIPN. Patients often followed suggestions of their medical oncology clinical team, but sometimes relied on the internet or other patients to recommend non-prescription strategies.

Conclusion: In the absence of many guideline-recommended strategies for CIPN prevention and treatment, some patients use options with minimal evidence of effectiveness. Additional research is needed to determine which strategies are effective for prevention and treatment so these can be implemented in practice to improve treatment outcomes in patients with cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患者报告的预防和治疗化疗引起的周围神经病变的策略。
目的:化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)是癌症治疗中使用的许多药物的衰弱毒性。有许多预防或治疗CIPN的策略,但由于其有效性的证据有限,很少有指南推荐。本调查的主要目的是了解患者使用什么策略来预防或治疗CIPN,并了解他们对CIPN预防和治疗的看法。方法:多国癌症支持治疗协会(MASCC)神经系统并发症研究组创建了一项横断面在线调查,招募目前或以前接受过神经毒性化疗并自我报告周围神经病变的个体。进行描述性统计。结果:447名调查参与者中的大多数没有使用任何CIPN预防策略(71%),尽管给予任何策略的选择,多数人更喜欢处方药或补充剂(30%)。最常用的治疗策略是运动(47%),一些患者尝试处方药,包括非指南推荐的加巴喷丁(33%)或指南推荐的度洛西汀(8%)。近一半的参与者(49%)至少使用一种非处方药治疗CIPN。患者通常会遵循肿瘤内科临床团队的建议,但有时也会依靠互联网或其他患者推荐的非处方策略。结论:在缺乏许多指南推荐的CIPN预防和治疗策略的情况下,一些患者使用了有效性证据最少的选择。需要进一步的研究来确定哪些策略对预防和治疗有效,以便在实践中实施这些策略,以改善癌症患者的治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Long-term outcomes among individuals living with and beyond head and neck cancer: a scoping review. Quality of life and burden in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg: results from a single-centre study. The effect of reminder mobile application use on medication adherence after total thyroidectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Adding home-use BIA scales, online food diaries, and tape-measures to large-scale questionnaire studies: Insights from the population-based PROFILES registry research. Interaction between illness cognitions and dyadic coping: a qualitative exploration of stress adaptation in young and middle-aged colorectal cancer patients and their spouses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1