The effect of deep diaphragmatic breathing on fatigue in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancers: a randomized clinical trial.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1007/s00520-025-09207-0
Maryam Rezaei, Alireza Abdi, Nader Salari, Mozaffar Aznab, Seyed Vahid Jasemi
{"title":"The effect of deep diaphragmatic breathing on fatigue in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancers: a randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Maryam Rezaei, Alireza Abdi, Nader Salari, Mozaffar Aznab, Seyed Vahid Jasemi","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09207-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fatigue is a common and unpleasant symptom experienced by many cancer patients. One method that has been suggested to reduce fatigue is deep diaphragmatic breathing. However, there is limited information available regarding the effectiveness of this technique for patients with advanced cancers. As a result, this study was conducted to investigate the impact of deep diaphragmatic breathing on fatigue in patients with gastrointestinal tract cancers that have spread to other parts of the body.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study, conducted in the oncology departments of Imam Reza (AS) Kermanshah Hospital in 2022, aimed to investigate the effects of an intervention test on 44 patients with malignant gastrointestinal cancer. Inclusion criteria include metastatic cancer of the gastrointestinal tract, the patient's consent to cooperate, and the age of 18-65 years. Exit criteria also include transfer from the oncology department, death, misdiagnosis, and non-cooperation The patients were selected as available and randomly assigned to two groups: an experimental group and a control group. The intervention test was performed by the experimental group twice a day for 10 days, with each session lasting for 10 min. Before and after the intervention, both groups completed research tools, which included Piper's fatigue questionnaire and a demographic information checklist. The data collected was analyzed using SPSS version 25 software.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>According to the findings, before the intervention, the average total fatigue was measured at 5.15 ± 1.98 in the case group and 4.43 ± 1.74 in the control group, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.213). However, after the intervention, the average total fatigue decreased to 3.59 ± 1.91 in the case group, whereas it increased to 6.14 ± 1.91 in the control group, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed that the method used in the treatment had a significant impact on reducing fatigue in patients. Considering its low cost and high feasibility, it is recommended to include this approach in the care plan for patients and make it a part of their routine.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>IRCT20220104053628N1, date: 2022-02-05.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 2","pages":"144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09207-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fatigue is a common and unpleasant symptom experienced by many cancer patients. One method that has been suggested to reduce fatigue is deep diaphragmatic breathing. However, there is limited information available regarding the effectiveness of this technique for patients with advanced cancers. As a result, this study was conducted to investigate the impact of deep diaphragmatic breathing on fatigue in patients with gastrointestinal tract cancers that have spread to other parts of the body.

Methods: This study, conducted in the oncology departments of Imam Reza (AS) Kermanshah Hospital in 2022, aimed to investigate the effects of an intervention test on 44 patients with malignant gastrointestinal cancer. Inclusion criteria include metastatic cancer of the gastrointestinal tract, the patient's consent to cooperate, and the age of 18-65 years. Exit criteria also include transfer from the oncology department, death, misdiagnosis, and non-cooperation The patients were selected as available and randomly assigned to two groups: an experimental group and a control group. The intervention test was performed by the experimental group twice a day for 10 days, with each session lasting for 10 min. Before and after the intervention, both groups completed research tools, which included Piper's fatigue questionnaire and a demographic information checklist. The data collected was analyzed using SPSS version 25 software.

Findings: According to the findings, before the intervention, the average total fatigue was measured at 5.15 ± 1.98 in the case group and 4.43 ± 1.74 in the control group, with no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.213). However, after the intervention, the average total fatigue decreased to 3.59 ± 1.91 in the case group, whereas it increased to 6.14 ± 1.91 in the control group, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: The study revealed that the method used in the treatment had a significant impact on reducing fatigue in patients. Considering its low cost and high feasibility, it is recommended to include this approach in the care plan for patients and make it a part of their routine.

Trial registration: IRCT20220104053628N1, date: 2022-02-05.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深膈呼吸对转移性胃肠癌患者疲劳的影响:一项随机临床试验。
背景:疲劳是许多癌症患者所经历的一种常见而不愉快的症状。已经提出的一种减少疲劳的方法是深横膈膜呼吸。然而,关于这种技术对晚期癌症患者的有效性的信息有限。因此,本研究旨在调查深膈呼吸对胃肠道癌症扩散到身体其他部位的患者疲劳的影响。方法:本研究于2022年在伊玛目礼萨(AS) Kermanshah医院肿瘤科进行,旨在探讨干预试验对44例恶性胃肠道癌患者的影响。纳入标准包括胃肠道转移性癌、患者同意配合、年龄18-65岁。退出标准还包括从肿瘤科转院、死亡、误诊和不合作。选取可用的患者,随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组进行干预测试,每天两次,持续10天,每次10分钟。干预前和干预后,两组均完成研究工具,包括Piper疲劳问卷和人口统计信息清单。收集的数据采用SPSS 25版软件进行分析。结果:根据研究结果,干预前,病例组的平均总疲劳为5.15±1.98,对照组为4.43±1.74,两组间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.213)。但干预后,病例组的平均总疲劳下降至3.59±1.91,对照组的平均总疲劳上升至6.14±1.91,两组间差异有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。结论:该治疗方法对减轻患者疲劳有明显的效果。考虑到其低成本和高可行性,建议将其纳入患者的护理计划,并使其成为患者日常生活的一部分。试验注册:IRCT20220104053628N1,日期:2022-02-05。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivors: an updated clinical practice review for healthcare providers. Preferences for electronic health information support concerning chemotherapy adverse reactions among young and middle-aged breast cancer patients based on the Kano model. Lipidomic profiles associated with treatment related hepatotoxicity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Caregiver health literacy in head and neck cancer and its relationship with caregiver and patient psychological distress. Toward Better Conversations: Assessing Caregiver-Child Communication in Pediatric Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1