Debulking surgery prior to stereotactic radiotherapy for head and neck paragangliomas.

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy Pub Date : 2024-10-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5603/rpor.101802
Geovanne Pedro Mauro, Leila Maria Da Roz, Vinicius de Carvalho Gico, Eduardo Weltman, Evandro César De Souza, Helena Espindola Baraldi, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Carlos Gilberto Carlotti
{"title":"Debulking surgery prior to stereotactic radiotherapy for head and neck paragangliomas.","authors":"Geovanne Pedro Mauro, Leila Maria Da Roz, Vinicius de Carvalho Gico, Eduardo Weltman, Evandro César De Souza, Helena Espindola Baraldi, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo, Carlos Gilberto Carlotti","doi":"10.5603/rpor.101802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgery has been used as standard treatment for head and neck paragangliomas. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has also been increasingly used for this disease. The results for combined modality are not well described. This analysis aims to describe the results for combined modality of debulking surgery and SRT for head and neck paragangliomas (HNP).</p><p><strong>Materials and and methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort of patients treated in a large university hospital between 2008 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one patients had their charts reviewed. Mean age was 56.3 years. Most were female (82.3%). Most lesions arose from the skull-base (84.3%) and not the inner ear. Most lesions were larger than 3 cm (51.0%) and mean lesion size was 4.4 cm. 36 (70.6%) were treated with radiotherapy alone while 15 (29.4%) were treated with combined modality treatment. Median follow-up was 42.5 months (7.1-112.8 months). There were no reported deaths nor disease progression. Debulking surgery did not impact response rate for SRT (52.8% <i>vs</i>. 47.2% for SRT alone and debulking surgery, respectively, p = 0.971). There was no impact on new neurological deficits after SRT (25.0 <i>vs</i>. 13.3%, respectively, p = 0.356).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Debulking surgery did not improve response rate for SRT. In our sample, it also did not impact new neurological deficits for SRT. Prospective data regarding HNP treatment is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":47283,"journal":{"name":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","volume":"29 4","pages":"454-459"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.101802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgery has been used as standard treatment for head and neck paragangliomas. Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) has also been increasingly used for this disease. The results for combined modality are not well described. This analysis aims to describe the results for combined modality of debulking surgery and SRT for head and neck paragangliomas (HNP).

Materials and and methods: Retrospective cohort of patients treated in a large university hospital between 2008 and 2023.

Results: Fifty-one patients had their charts reviewed. Mean age was 56.3 years. Most were female (82.3%). Most lesions arose from the skull-base (84.3%) and not the inner ear. Most lesions were larger than 3 cm (51.0%) and mean lesion size was 4.4 cm. 36 (70.6%) were treated with radiotherapy alone while 15 (29.4%) were treated with combined modality treatment. Median follow-up was 42.5 months (7.1-112.8 months). There were no reported deaths nor disease progression. Debulking surgery did not impact response rate for SRT (52.8% vs. 47.2% for SRT alone and debulking surgery, respectively, p = 0.971). There was no impact on new neurological deficits after SRT (25.0 vs. 13.3%, respectively, p = 0.356).

Conclusion: Debulking surgery did not improve response rate for SRT. In our sample, it also did not impact new neurological deficits for SRT. Prospective data regarding HNP treatment is needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
115
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is an interdisciplinary bimonthly journal, publishing original contributions in clinical oncology and radiotherapy, as well as in radiotherapy physics, techniques and radiotherapy equipment. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy is a journal of the Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, the Czech Society of Radiation Oncology, the Hungarian Society for Radiation Oncology, the Slovenian Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Polish Study Group of Head and Neck Cancer, the Guild of Bulgarian Radiotherapists and the Greater Poland Cancer Centre, affiliated with the Spanish Society of Radiotherapy and Oncology, the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and the Portuguese Society of Radiotherapy - Oncology.
期刊最新文献
Prehabilitation approaches for gastrointestinal cancer surgery: a narrative review. Reirradiation of gliomas with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: efficacy and tolerance analysis at a single center. Tracing prostate cancer - the evolution of PET-CT applications. Treatment of oropharyngeal cancer during the COVID-19 lockdown - outcomes for patients treated during the pandemic. Can the reprogrammed cancer cells serve as an alternative source of (induced) cancer stem cells?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1